Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Clinton courts rural voters -- not!

by: Jay Stevens

Fri Oct 19, 2007 at 06:40:56 AM MST


So, it's probably wise that she's courting rural voters (pdf), right? Okay, so it's just a lunch. And it's not exactly located in a rural area - it's in Washington D.C. Oh, and it's taking place at a lobbyist firm. At Troutman Sanders Public Affairs, to be specific, the lobbying firm for?er?Monsanto, the agri-biotech multinational.

Yes, that Monsanto. The firm that tried topatent the pig, the firm that's responsible for more than 50 Superfund sites, the firm that dumped tons of pesticides and PCBs into our environment, that sued milk manufactures for labeling their products "hormone free," producer of apertame, bovine growth hormones, "terminator" crops, PCBs, etc & co. One of the sleaziest corporations in a world filled with sleazy corporations.

Holding an agri-summit in the plush halls of the lobbyists for Monsanto doesn't sound like the kind of "rural Americans" a presidential candidate would necessarily want to be photographed with.

Particularly if Clinton's two primary opponents -- former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. -- don't take money from lobbyists and are trying to depict the frontrunner as too much a part of the corrupt Washington system, lobbyists, corporate America, et al?.

But then again, it doesn't say Clinton will attend this luncheon -- just senior staffers and congressional endorsers! (Is that better or worse?)

Compare Clinton's luncheon with today's cover (pdf) of Raleigh's The News & Observer.

Anyone doubt now that Clinton won't go over too well with Montanans?

Jay Stevens :: Clinton courts rural voters -- not!
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Frustration (0.00 / 0)
Seems that both major parties have a hard time stepping away from corporate interests and backing their more populist candidates who actually have a shot at actually appealing to voters and creating some positive change.  Though compared to GWB, Bill Clinton was practically the Jolly Green Giant, the truth is that the Clintons are not particularly good on environmental issues.  Never were.  I worry that no matter who is elected, they will fiddle while Rome (and the rest of the planet) burns.

Gadfly

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox