Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Why No Lengthy Response?

by: Matt Singer

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 10:31:53 AM MST


So everyone seems to be wondering why I haven't offered a full response to the dozen random right-wing blogs piling on my fake grassroots operation.

Short answer? The posts in question address the past 5 years of my life, spanning work with at least 3 different organizations while raising questions about people who have or are indirectly paying my salary (even if Carol Minjares couldn't quite figure out who those people are).

The posts in question also raise issues ranging from theories of power building to the tax code and campaign finance law -- all of those are complicated topics.

In other words, if you haven't seen my response, that ain't surprising. Election Day is a week away. I'm working with dozens of volunteers, trying to hire a replacement for Forward Montana's first ever staff person, trying to raise money to keep the door open and the lights on, and planning for a much bigger operation in 2008. Dealing with pages of inaccurate accusations mixed with personal insults wasn't really how I planned on spending this week.

During John Adams' reporting, we went through a lot of this terrain -- in interviews that spanned probably 8-10 hours.

A full response would probably require a book, but as Ed Kemmick has asked elsewhere (in comments, which I didn't even see until someone directed me), why don't I point out the clear falsehoods?

  • Forward Montana has never directly or indirectly to my knowledge received a dime of money from George Soros.

  • Forward Montana has roughly 375 dues-paying members. Over 350 of those currently reside in Montana. All but a very small handful (7 or 8) have lived in Montana at some point in their lives.

  • MontPIRG did not fund attack posters on Aaron Flint.

  • Skyline Public Works is operated by Andy and Deborah Rappaport, not Jonathan and Peter Lewis. It also is not a "money laundering" operation for multiple large donors. It is the name by which a single couple run their political operation.

  • Despite having seven or eight out-of-state donors who have never lived in Montana, with the exception of Skyline Public Works, none of them are major donors ($1,000+). The rest of our major donors live in Montana.
Some clear half-truths?
  • The Roosevelt Institution is not some super-powerful operation. Its budget is maybe a couple hundred thousand dollars. It was started by some students at Stanford who thought that just maybe some graduate students could use their research to craft new public policy solutions that could help this country out. In other words, it was an operation set up by a handful of punk kids at some college frustrated with politics as usual who found some angel donors to help them reach their dreams. Sounds familiar.
As for some of the other stuff about PSN's funding sources, I can't really speak to it. I was never really involved in the fundraising operation (as communications people rarely are).

Heaven knows that this is only a partial response to the shotgun blast of accusations. But like I said, Election Day is a week away and I've got a job to do. If you're especially perturbed by any allegation and want to know what's up, I'm pretty easy to track down.

Forward Montana is, after all, listed in the phone book.

Matt Singer :: Why No Lengthy Response?
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Fred Astaire... (0.00 / 1)
and Dan Dailey, eat your hearts out....:~)

Get used to losing to guys who play by the rules. (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Squid is a great indicator of response. (0.00 / 0)
There is no controversy here, Matt, except among those who are just going to believe what they want anyway.  With the exception of some anonymous buddy of Dave Budge (that's integrity for you) none of the righty wailing are accusations of anything worse than that you look like their boogie mans and you scare them and it's ALL YOUR FAULT!  So don't waste your time on it. 

Although, I really did want to read you telling Budge that you owe him nothing so he can just suck on it.


Forward Montana (4.00 / 1)
I'll get a check in the mail to Forward Montana (from Lewistown, Montana) today.

All the best

Same here (0.00 / 0)
I'll send one in this week.

[ Parent ]
Me too (0.00 / 0)
And keep up the good work.

[ Parent ]
You're Right (0.00 / 0)
It is time to send another check. 

[ Parent ]
Rockstars (0.00 / 0)
I'll up my monthly donation!

[ Parent ]
re: Why No Lengthy Response? (0.00 / 0)
One would assume that the former communications guy for the progressive states network wouldn't have a problem communicating succinctly and honesty about the truthfulness or dishonesty contained in the "famous" anonymous post.

How many words have been wasted on this post, an email exchange with at least one other blogger who has the balls to admit it (how many haven't?), and in over 60+ comments and at least 5 posts on other blogs when all that would have sufficed was a simple outright categorical denial of the anonymous allegations? Seems like a simple solution for a guy who has in one way or another been involved in the communications business for the 3 or 4 years of his adult life.

I seem to remember the allegations regarding a certain blue dress initially being anonymous. Perhaps, Mr. Singer, you're awaiting input from others, in organizations or prople who do your funding, to let you how how to address the alleged unfounded allegation, all of this on top of not knowing what else is out there? Of perhaps you're just in over your head?


You Wish (0.00 / 0)
Again....there you all go wishing that "something amiss" was happening to Forward Montana. Keep wishing. Forward Montana is very legal, they even said who funded them, way back in August 2006, search the archives it was in the paper.  They also tell all of their other donors, it's in all their fundraising material. Have you all been sleeping? Your just jealous that you don't have half the brain that Matt does.

Keep wishing....it keeps you busy typing lousy posts and doing absolutely nothing for your side!


[ Parent ]
And yet.... (0.00 / 0)
another wagon has joined the circle.  Sheeeez, youse guys have nothing over Ward Bond and his merry band of arrow catchers.  I'll tune in tomorrow for an update.

[ Parent ]
Seriously... (0.00 / 0)
None of us has broken the law.  Forward Montana is no different than any other political organization that has received a grant.  It's called a "matching grant."  For those of you who don't know what that is, it means that the Rappaports have agreed to match the funds that Matt raises, and he's been kicking ass, and he's done it close to home.  Virtually all of FMT's donors reside in Montana.  Those that don't were born here and moved.  Go peek under the hood.  You'll just find a nice engine. I guarantee your chasing phantoms, but it is Halloween so by all means waste your time chasing them.  Just don't break the law when YOU'RE doing it. Slander is crime too.

[ Parent ]
Accountability (0.00 / 0)
From reading these posts, it's clear where some of Forward Montana's funding comes from.  Now, perhaps the republicans reading this post can turn their sensitive noses to the steaming piles of corruption and unaccountability that the republican party has left laying around this state for years.  Why can't you sniff out the real problems in this State?  Pat "I'll run Montana like a business" Davison, for example, or Conrad "Give 'em everything they want" Burns's rotting carcass of corruption, or John "I hear nothing, I see nothing" Mercer?  And here's a current problems for you clever republican sleuths, looking for grassroots funding.  See if you can get Trevis Butcher, and his dad, alleged representative "Ed" Butcher to disclose the funding sources of "Montanans in Action" before me and all the other taxpayers have to waste thousands of dollars forcing them to do so in court.  Vote montana "our s**t don't stink" republicans!  Circle the wagons, boys!

All the best

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Purely Hypothetical, of course, but - The best candidate for the Republicans for US Senate is:
Corey Stapleton
Dennis Rehberg
Marc Racicot
Champ Edmunds
Steve Daines
Harris Himes
Kreyton Kerns

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox