Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Out of Iowa

by: Matt Singer

Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 13:30:41 PM MST


If I'd voted yesterday, I probably would have voted for John Edwards. If I was voting today, I'd probably vote for Barack Obama. Truth be told, I like Edwards more, but these fields inevitably narrow and I really like Obama quite a bit as well.

Sa la vie.

Have to say, though, that it is tough for me to swallow Colby's thoughts, knocking Obama's chances because he brought out new voters and young voters. The truth is, youth voting has been on the uptick for two cycles in a row, with every indication that it will tick up again in '08. Getting upset with Barack Obama for doing well in this regard is like getting mad at a swimmer for performing well in water -- ideally, that's what swimmers do.

And, ideally, political leaders give previously disenchanted people enough, yes, hope to get involved.

So good for Obama.

What of the Republicans? I have to admit, I'm slightly taken aback by the loathing for Mike Huckabee. He kinda strikes me as the GOP equivalent of the Dems' Bill Richardson. Fairly charismatic Governor of a mid-size state who is generally in touch with the base of his party on some key issues, but is also a bit out of whack on some key economic stuff.

If Richardson had won Iowa, would the Democratic establishment be trying to tank him the way the GOP establishment is trying to destroy Huck? Doubtful, but who knows? They did go after Dean in a fierce (though less fierce) fashion.

I'm curious to see how the Republican's evangelical base, the people power of their party, reacts to this obvious condescension. I know I'd get pretty pissed. The question (perhaps inartfully worded) is whether they turn the other cheek. Or maybe they've come with a sword to cast the money changers out of the tent. Who knows?

Ron Paul's fervent base turned into tepid support. John McCain is the establishment's new man now that Romney has faltered. Fred Thompson, beating McCain, is strangely forgotten.

And we waltz on into New Hampshire.

No predictions on NH -- at least not until some post-Iowa polls come out. But on the GOP side, the big question is this, if Iowa's Corn lovers went for Hucking, will the Granite State go for the chiseled Mitt?

Matt Singer :: Out of Iowa
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Out of Iowa | 3 comments
Several things (0.00 / 0)
First, Huckabee is no Bill Richardson.  Richardson has international capabilities and experience that most of the other candidates can only wish they had.  But Richardson really isn't that charismatic.  Huckabee is (after all, it was part of his job, being a preacher and all.)  Richardson has appeal, in the states fondly referred to as "fly over".  Huckabee will have the same in the "belt".

Second, Richardson is now faced with the hardest decisions of any candidate coming out of Iowa.  It's an easy call when you get 0% of the vote.  Not so easy when you get 2%, and the states you feel strongest in don't vote for a while.

Third:

If Richardson had won Iowa, would the Democratic establishment be trying to tank him the way the GOP establishment is trying to destroy Huck?

I really don't think so.  The operative Republican mindset (for some time) has been "shut up and vote how you're told". The religious right is nothing more than a tool for the power brokers of the Republican machinery.  The last thing they want is a charismatic holy-roller who doesn't understand the profits of war and international manipulation.  Huckabee scares the crap out of them, and they will bury him because of it.


Richardson's results... (0.00 / 0)
The 2% result is misleading, because candidates needed to pull at least 15% of delegates in any given precinct to win delegates. Richardson won 2% of the delegates, not the popular vote. Pre-caucus polls had him between 10 and 15 percent. Which actually makes the choice you noted all the harder. That's a big chunk of voters in a tight race. If he backed a candidate, it could mean the nomination.

Methinks he should start thinking about which cabinet position he wants. Interior?


[ Parent ]
Hmmm (0.00 / 0)
I'd say Energy again. State wouldn't be too bad for him, but I think Hillary or Obama have their eyes on who they want for that one. I think it's possible for Richardson to add a lot as a VP. He could definatly round out some problems people have with Obama, or solidify Hillary. Although Richardson should be dropping out now, and running for Senate. That's an easy seat to win, and he can walk into it.

[ Parent ]
Out of Iowa | 3 comments
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox