Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Is it a mistake for Democratic presidential candidates to ignore the West?

by: Jay Stevens

Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 07:43:58 AM MST


As requested, Wulfgar! wrote up a great post on his reaction to Bill Richardson's dropping out of the presidential race last week. In it, he rightly notes that "he was the only candidate on either side of the aisle who really appeared to understand the West." In a very real way, Richardson's fate is tied to the role that the Rocky Mountain West has played in the presidential contest.

This was supposed to be our year, after all. The DNC recognized the brewing possibility for change here, and maneuvered to have the Democratic Convention in Denver. Nevada's primary was pushed up in the schedule to give a chance to the presidential candidates to air their views on Western issues when it still mattered.

Today, Kossak mcjoan - herself a Westerner - examines the political environment in the region, and rues the fact that the West hasn't become key to the current race, because the West has a lot to teach politicos, especially Democrats (emphasis hers):

There is also the risk of misreading the basic anti-partisan orientation of [the region's independent] voters as a longing for bipartisanship. It's important to note that, in the context of this region, anti-partisan is not the equivalent of bipartisan. Western voters are highly pragmatic, looking for problem solvers first, and ideological debate is of less interest than action. Misreading this as some great yearning for comity can result in short-lived and uneasy compromises that erode the Democratic brand and end up diluting policies and programs. That doesn't have to happen. Voters in the Mountain West are more swayed by results than by process. Battles can be won, even in the most unlikely of places, by taking strong, principled, progressive stands.

[snip]

Taking strong, controversial, and unabashedly progressive stands hasn't proven to be the direction that either of our front-running candidates tends to take, at least not thus far. In a primary campaign, they arguably don't have to, but they might want to start getting some practice in before the general. If they want to win the West, and arguably the country, they're going to have to show some of the grit of those illustrious Western Dems.

Discuss.

Jay Stevens :: Is it a mistake for Democratic presidential candidates to ignore the West?
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox