Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

South Carolina, Obama, the Clintons, and the Kennedys

by: Matt Singer

Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 14:37:33 PM MST


Damn. Last night was big. To some extent, it was the first real win of the primary season on the Democratic side. The rest were basically ties or narrow wins. Last night, South Carolina went overwhelming for the Man from Audacity.

The news gets worse for the Clintons. Even though Hillary is still in the pole position, Ted Kennedy is endorsing Barack Obama. In Democratic politics, there are fewer bigger names.

Right-wingers will no doubt chortle that Ted Kennedy's endorsement could mean anything. Even as modern Republicans occasionally try to claim Jack Kennedy as one of theirs (a bizarre postmortem baptism if ever there was one), they treat his surviving brother as a devil. Strange, one would think, that the third brother of a highly political family would have such different core values than those of his brethren.

Now, I'm not going to claim that Ted Kennedy is an angel. Few of us are. But he is one of the strongest voices of American liberalism and he has been one of its most effective during his time in the U.S. Senate.

Just as noteworthy is why he is endorsing. Long story short: he's pissed at the Clintons' attempts at racial divisiveness. He's not just lending his name, either. He's hitting the road, talking to union members and Hispanic voters in a number of February 5th states. In Massachusetts, which votes on 2/5, this could be game-changing, especially when wedded to the endorsements of Deval Patrick and John Kerry. In California, this will play well (and it comes on top of the endorsement of the highest-ranking Latino in the U.S. House -- Xavier Bacerra).

Long story short, this race is on completely. As I wrote at AOL, I thought Hillary Clinton made a big mistake refusing to offer a real concession last night. The momentum in this race has often gone to the high-road sympathetic figure.

Her "calvinball" approach to whether Florida and Michigan's delegates ought to count ain't helping much either. Rules are only rules and heaven knows they can change, but changing the rules based on the outcome is an awful way to operate.

Update -- And Kathleen Sebelius? Damn. That's quite a pick-up. Kansas also votes on Super Fat Tuesday, so this won't hurt. Plus, Sebelius and Napolitano (and, I suppose, Claire McCaskill) are among the Democratic Party's leading new female faces. For them to endorse Obama is a big statement (think if Deval Patrick had endorsed Hillary Clinton).

Matt Singer :: South Carolina, Obama, the Clintons, and the Kennedys
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Another big endorcement (0.00 / 0)
Don't forget Caroline Kennedy.  She endorced Obama even though, earlier, she'd been a Hillary booster.

Turner (0.00 / 0)
I meant "endorsed."

Uh, Jay... (0.00 / 0)
You forgot about my endorsement.  That's going to give him a big bump in bumf*%k northern Pennsylvania.

Whoa, buddy (0.00 / 0)
Jay's doing the bulk of the writing, but this one's on me.

[ Parent ]
McCaskill (0.00 / 0)
Just a thought on the Senator McCaskill, and other ladies comment. I don't think and I don't think you think that the women in this party should back a woman because she is a woman. Please. How is that a "big statement"? Did you expect her to endorse someone else? If so, who or whom? If Her, why do you think its that simple. Just a thought...

As exit polls are showing (0.00 / 0)
Identity politics isn't a thing of the past. That's a true of white men (who went heavily for Edwards) as it is for white women or black men.

I don't think it's "that simple," I just think that it is meaningful that a number of national caliber women (who should, in their own rights, be considered potential Presidential candidates at some point) are endorsing Barack Obama.


[ Parent ]
Hey, (0.00 / 0)
Hilly let Billy get a hummer from a 21 yr. old and didn't cut his balls off!  Whasupwiththat?  THESE PEOPLE HAVE NO VALUES!, let alone family values!  Now, I ask you, if the little lady caught YOU get'im a hummer from a twenty something, wouldn't YOU be just a tad bit worried bout losin' the family jewels some night in your sleep?  Sumthin' real  wrong with these people!

Sides, Billy is to Hilly what Billy was to Jimmy, Carter that is.  A complete embarrassment!  MOST people, myself included, cannot STAND the thought of Billy and his wild willy for ANOTHER eight years in the White House!  That's why folks are goin' for O'Bama.  The Clintons are just too messed up!


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox