Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

On Berkeley and "patriots"

by: Jay Stevens

Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 12:52:10 PM MST


If you aren't a regular reader of the right-wing blogs, you wouldn't be aware of their latest hysteria over a controversial proclamation made by the Berkeley, California, city council against the Iraq war. As is Berkeley's wont, they went overboard and said that Marine recruiters are "uninvited and unwelcome intruders," and sicced Code Pink on the city's Marine recruitment office by giving them a designated parking space in front of the office.

Right-wing hell broke out. DC politicos threatened to pull the city's federal funding, and a horde of pro-war demonstrated descended on Berkeley. Last night, the city council backed down.

Council members conceded that they had erred in passing a resolution Jan. 29 that condemned the Marines - rather than the war in Iraq - and some council members added that they felt they owed U.S. troops an apology as well the many Berkeley residents who were ashamed and offended by their position.

"To err is human but to really screw up it takes the Berkeley City Council," said council member Gordon Wozniak. "We failed our city. We embarrassed our city."

Exactly right. It's one thing to oppose the war and the president's policies, it's another to sanction or abet harassment of soldiers and recruits. To be fair to Berkeley, the Marine recruitment office was a physical manifestation of the government they dislike, which they view as aggressively forcing itself into their way of life. Their proclamation was a kind of Sagebrush rebellion, West Coast style. Emotional, angry, ill-considered.

And then there's the rhetoric from the right. Take Melanie Morgan, a radio talk show host (what else?), who was involved in the pro-war demonstrations. Berkeley-ites are "America haters," "Pinkos," "freaks," and "traitors." Those on "her" side are "patriots." There's an effort to somehow paint the city and its inhabitants as outsiders or aliens, fit only for contempt, and decidedly "un-American." Morgan:

Society for years has endured the freakish antics of Berkeley dwellers. Naked people streaking in the streets; smelly hippies begging for money as they sing drunken renditions of '60s anti-war songs; adults sitting in trees like a bad zoo exhibit.

But the Berkeley City Council and instigators from the extreme left have crossed the line this time. The council Tuesday night passed two anti-military, anti-American resolutions and agreed to send a letter to the city's only Marine recruiting office saying the military are "uninvited intruders."

This is treasonous, hateful behavior that steals the First Amendment rights of the Marines, the very group that protects our constitutional rights. What galls me most is that Berkeley is the birthplace of the modern free-speech movement and now it is has drawn battle lines in the war against the First Amendment.

In reality, what's going on here is that Berkeley is fighting for its particular brand of its world view. They are not unpatriotic. (One city council member who supported the proclamation is actually a Marine vet who fought in Vietnam.) And whatever their faults, they are absolutely, one-hundred-percent American. You may not agree with what they did - I certainly don't - you may dislike the image of Berkeley created for you by the Morgans of the world (the actual Berkeley in no way resembles the "freakish" hippie town Morgan would have you see), but you can't argue that somehow the city is an alien nation, outside the body politic. Berkeley is as American as Kansas.

What's going on here, is that the frothing right is putting Berkeley up as its scapegoat, an exaggerated caricature. It's an "other" subhuman collective that represents a threat to the paleo-conservative's particular and fantastic national mythos. (And liberals are the Fascists??) I guess these folks need to stay outraged to focus themselves at a time when their ideology and policies have proven themselves not only disastrous in practice, but wildly unpopular as well.

Enough, already, folks.

I'll let Obama's words from his Iowa victory speech close out for me...

Jay Stevens :: On Berkeley and "patriots"
You said the time has come to move beyond the bitterness and pettiness and anger that's consumed Washington.

To end the political strategy that's been all about division, and instead make it about addition. To build a coalition for change that stretches through red states and blue states....

We are choosing hope over fear.

We're choosing unity over division, and sending a powerful message that change is coming to America.

I'll be a president who ends this war in Iraq and finally brings our troops home...

... who restores our moral standing, who understands that 9/11 is not a way to scare up votes but a challenge that should unite America and the world against the common threats of the 21st century.

Common threats of terrorism and nuclear weapons, climate change and poverty, genocide and disease....

This was the moment when we tore down barriers that have divided us for too long; when we rallied people of all parties and ages to a common cause; when we finally gave Americans who have never participated in politics a reason to stand up and to do so.

This was the moment when we finally beat back the policies of fear and doubts and cynicism, the politics where we tear each other down instead of lifting this country up. This was the moment.

Years from now, you'll look back and you'll say that this was the moment, this was the place where America remembered what it means to hope. For many months, we've been teased, even derided for talking about hope. But we always knew that hope is not blind optimism. It's not ignoring the enormity of the tasks ahead or the roadblocks that stand in our path.

It's not sitting on the sidelines or shirking from a fight. Hope is that thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us if we have the courage to reach for it and to work for it and to fight for it....

Hope is what led a band of colonists to rise up against an empire. What led the greatest of generations to free a continent and heal a nation. What led young women and young men to sit at lunch counters and brave fire hoses and march through Selma and Montgomery for freedom's cause....

Hope is the bedrock of this nation. The belief that our destiny will not be written for us, but by us, by all those men and women who are not content to settle for the world as it is, who have the courage to remake the world as it should be.

That is what we started here in Iowa and that is the message we can now carry to New Hampshire and beyond.

The same message we had when we were up and when we were down; the one that can save this country, brick by brick, block by block, that together, ordinary people can do extraordinary things.

Because we are not a collection of red states and blue states. We are the United States of America. And in this moment, in this election, we are ready to believe again.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I don't know... (0.00 / 0)
why some on the right are upset with these a**holes in Berkeley either.  That's the way they are and that's the way they'll always be because that's who and what these people, who  reside in that s**thole, are.  

And just where the hell was law enforcement when this Code Pink(official color of the democrat party)puke outfit violated  federal law?  Probably busy listening to Obama's talk a lot but say absolutely nothing speech.  This guy is so far in over his head.


I mostly agree with you (0.00 / 0)
This is weird Jay, but I think you got it mostly right!  I would only make a small semantic correction.  Being "American" (and they definitely are) does not make them "patriots."  They are certainly not patriots by most definitions of that word.

It's funny, but I had a conversation with someone the other day who was proud that my hometown Missoula was the "Berkeley of Montana"... not sure what that means, but like I said: funny.


hm... (0.00 / 0)
...well Berkeley-ites would likely argue they're "patriots," and that conservatives who support the war and its apparent (from Berkeley standards) goals are the "traitors." It all depends on what you think best suits the country. Anyway, we're just arguing semantics here...


[ Parent ]
Nuremburg defense Not acceptable (0.00 / 0)
After WW II to offer protection to military personel who had the morality to dis obey "illegal" orders from "legal" authorities ( i.e. detaining family members as hostages, torturing prisoners, involved with wars of conquest etc.) the UN and the US military incorporated rules with in the military rules of conduct that military personel have an obligation to disobey such illegal orders.

Combine this with the claim that with the all merc military the US has is the most "professional" military that the US has ever had and that the average age of the merc's in uniform were well into the 20's, not 18 year old draftees, there is no excuse for the moral and ethical bankrupcy that has been displayed by those people disgracing their uniforms and our flag.

Remember the difference between merc's and soldiers is that soldiers are suppose to know and obey the rules of war and protect innocent civilians. If it is true that we had the most "Professional" military that means they were suppose to be famaliar with the applicable rules of war plus the universal code of Military justice.

Obviously from by being involved in the invasion and conquest of Iraq and the continueing atrocities we did not have a "professional Military" only moral cowards and war criminials.

The present US military is disgrace to our country, its history and a blot on human history.


So tell me..... (0.00 / 0)
Rational, your feelings about all the innocent people a certain civilian ordered exterminated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and tell me your feelings also about the millions of innocent children civilians butcher, each year, in the name of pro-choice.

Put in your words, the present crop of sanctimonious liberals, such as yourself, are a disgrace to our country, its history and a blot on human history. They are the real moral cowards and the real criminals.

   


[ Parent ]
Ok I will tell you (0.00 / 0)
The Pro choice analogy is a bogus lie cooked up by hypocrites who are only concerned about cheap labor and cannon fodder.
Historically choice was accepted by all religions and cultures. Even Catholicism accepted it well into the 19th century. It was only when the christianist's decided it was a good wedge issue that religion became an overt tool of reactionary politics that it became an issue.

Under the classic Augistian definition of a "Just" war Hiroshima was acceptable since the lost of life by that action was less then that which would have occured as a result of an invasion of Japan. Couple that with the prevention of genocide that the Japanese were in the process of preparing in Micronesia it was an regrettable but acceptable deciion.

The present crop of cheap merc's who are disgracing our country and their uniform by relying upon the Nuremburg defense of just obeying orders are disgrace to the uniform.

With authority comes responsibility. The present military has failed on so many levels that it is a waste of time to consider the bogus and manufactored defense's that are presented to defend these cheap thugs.


[ Parent ]
Lordy.... (0.00 / 0)
so much animosity and hatred for the men and women of our armed forces.  One would think you were a former member who was booted out.

Anyway I'll leave you with this from an anonymous member of the military. "It is far better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by 6."


[ Parent ]
Wow, (0.00 / 0)
It's almost like 1968, all over again.

All the way from the specter of Chicago Convention '68 on down to the hippy in the Missoulian LTE's today, decrying his right to be a hippy in the fact of all the epithets thrown at him.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox