Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Ask Baucus and Tester to Save Montana's Hospitals and Clinics

by: TheFatLadySings

Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 13:47:04 PM MST


(If you had any doubt about the Bush adminstration's attitude towards average Americans, wonder no further. Here's another gambit by the WH crowd to save budget money for tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations at our expense. Cross-posted at MyDD.com. - promoted by Jay Stevens)

While most of us are focused on insurance and universal care, the Bush Administration has been incrementally shredding our existing public health safety net in ways that have yet to become apparent.  The most recent assault on our public health care infrastructure is escaping the notice of mainstream media and citizen journalists alike, probably because it is not easily explained. I am referring to a proposed set of arcane regulation changes by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) which, if enacted, will result in $15 billion dollars in cuts over five years to service providers, potentially leaving huge geographic gaps in trauma coverage for Montana.

Senator Max Baucus, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is in a position to do something about it

TheFatLadySings :: Ask Baucus and Tester to Save Montana's Hospitals and Clinics
The damage that Bush has not been able to inflict through legislation is now being secretly implemented through an administrative back door. Even if Congress rejects the cuts Bush proposed to public health in his most recent budget, changes in regulations will insure that funding is not available for specific programs and activities.

The proposed CMS regulations will drastically reduce resources for programs as diverse as  graduate medical education (FR72:28930-28936), hospital and ER care (FR72:29748-29836), outpatient hospital and clinic services (FR72-55158-55166), school based health programs including enrollment efforts (FR73635-73651), services to individuals with disabilities (FR72:45201), and case management services (FR72:68077-68093).  Moreover, the rules changes severely restrict   (FR72-73708-73720) or eliminate avenues for appeal of future CMS decisions.

The most dramatic of the proposed changes will enforce draconian cuts to public and teaching hospitals, and eliminate public subsidies for training the next generation of physicians.  If enacted, these rules could leave low income and rural communities completely without trauma coverage, and some states with no way to train new doctors. The rules changes will impede homeland security efforts to prepare communities for pandemics, terrorist attacks or other disasters.

In a  letter to Henry Waxman dated February 14, 2008, Dr. Bruce A. Chernoff, the Director and Chief Medical Officer of Los Angeles County Health Services wrote, "Within the last five years, ten hospitals in the [LA] county have either shut down their ER or completely closed the hospital.  If a series of Medicaid regulations currently awaiting implementation by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are allowed to go into effect, ER care in the county will be devastated."

Arnold Schwartzenegger, the Republican Governor of California agrees, along with his colleagues on both sides of the aisle. The New York Times reported strong support from Republican and Democratic governors alike for a moratorium on the proposed rules.  A group of 17 states called the rules "simply awful policy" according to the NYT.

While heavily populated states such as New York and California may lose greater amounts of funding, rural states such as Montana and New Mexico will also be heavily impacted.  "In New Mexico, sometimes there is only one hospital for a multi-county region larger than an eastern state.  If you lose that hospital, then there is no trauma care," said Lorenzo Valdez, county manager of Rio Arriba County which is approximately the size of Massachusetts.

In addition to these rules changes, the administration has announced its intent to publish changes to three more mystery rules.  As these changes have not yet been published, it is impossible to predict their future impact.

Most of the $15 billion dollars of cost for indigent care will be shifted onto state and local government at a time of economic slowdown.  States and counties will be hard pressed to raise revenues to offset federal losses. Moreover, states and counties that are economically disadvantaged will experience greater impact from these cuts for two reasons: they have poorer populations which are unable to bear the disproportionate levels of taxation necessary to preserve their healthcare infrastructure; and, because the poor are the first to lose insurance, need in these communities will increase at a faster rate.  Finally, economically disadvantaged local governments are already forced to devote high percentages of their budgets to unfunded federal mandates such as the jail expenditures caused by mandatory minimum sentencing, and hence, will have less budget available to offset health care losses.

The proposed Medicaid Rules Changes will exacerbate the growing disparity between those who can access health care in America and those that cannot.  Last year, at the request of the nation's governors, Congress repeatedly acted on a bi-partisan basis to delay the implementation of new rules through a series of moratoria.  This year, 139 organizations have signed a letter to Congressional leaders requesting a blanket moratorium on changes to all Medicaid rules for a one year period.

In addition, there is a bipartisan effort in both houses to introduce a moratorium on two of the most devastating rules changes.  Senators Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), Elizabeth Dole (R-NC) and 24 co-sponsors have introduced S 2460 extending a one year moratorium on rules changes targeting subsidies to public and teaching hospitals. Montana Senators Max Baucus and Jon Tester are not co-sponsors of this bill. Representatives Eliot Engel (D-NY) and Sue Myrick (R-NC) along with 208 co-sponsors have introduced HR 3533, the "Save Our Public and Teaching Hospitals Act." No members of the Montana Congressional delegation are current co-sponsors.

"New Mexico depends on Medicaid funding to ensure the state's most vulnerable citizens have access to health care.  The proposed rules would severely restrict the state's ability to provide medical services to uninsured patients," Bingaman said for this article.  "This is an issue that will impact states nation wide and I strongly urge my colleagues to support this bill."

While Senator Hillary Clinton has signed on as a co-sponsor of S 2460, Senators Barak Obama and John McCain have not.

Actions You Can Take

You can contact Senator Max Baucus, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee at baucus.senate.gov/contact/emailForm.cfm?subj=issue and politely let him know you would appreciate his help passing S 2460 as well as a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes.

You can contact Senator Jon Tester as well at tester.senate.gov/contact/ and politely let him know you would appreciate his help passing S 2460 as well as a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes.

You can contact Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) at (202) 224-3542 and tell him to help pass S 2460 along with a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes.

You can contact House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) at 202) 225-0100 and ask her to support HR 3533 as well as a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes.

You can contact your own representatives and ask them to support these bills along with a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes.

You can contact Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) at (202) 224-4451 and thank her for her support for S 2460. Ask her to support a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes and to make stoppage of CMS rules changes a platform in her campaign.

You can contact Senator Barak Obama (D-IL) at (202) 224-2854 and ask him to please support S 2460 as well as a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes.  Ask him to make the moratorium a talking point in his campaign.

You can contact Senator John McCain (R-AZ) at (202) 224-2235 and ask him to please support S 2460 as well as a one year moratorium on all CMS rules changes.  Ask him to make the moratorium a talking point in his campaign.

Thank you for your support on this very important issue!

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Number of teaching hospitals in Montana: (0.00 / 0)
Zero.

So, where in California are you from FatLady?


??? (4.00 / 1)
One assumes these cuts will affect UW, where Montana's med students study...

Where in California are you from, MTSentinel?


[ Parent ]
Ass of U and Me (0.00 / 0)
UW is funded via WWAMI which is a cooperative interstate agreement funded by state money and tuition costs - exclusively.  So if one were to assume as you expect they should do, they would just be wrong.

Google is your friend.  It can also help you avoid making an Ass of mostly U.


[ Parent ]
got me! (0.00 / 0)
...on the "teaching" hospitals. But I did do a Google search on public hospitals here in Montana. And we have a couple. Let's see...there are public hospitals in Anaconda, Big Sandy, Big Timber, Billings (seven), Bozeman (two), Browning, Butte (two), Chester, Chinook, Choteau, Circle, Columbus, Conrad, Culbertson, Cut Bank, Deer Lodge, Dillon, Ekalaka, Ennis, Forsyth...

Well, you get the point.

Hate to see some of these institutions shut down their ERs.

Hey, a lot of those towns are in rural Montana! Isn't that your "base"? You think Democrats could use cuts to these institutions as a wedge issue in 2008? Just curious.


[ Parent ]
Look... (0.00 / 0)
Instead of me wasting my time, why don't you do what I did - and what the post suggested - and contact Baucus and Tester.  Ask them if this will impact Montana in any way.  Waste their time - not mine!  Win-win baby!

[ Parent ]
We should contact Rehberg too (4.00 / 1)
No?

Why does he seem to escape all scrutiny?


[ Parent ]
Look... (0.00 / 0)
Instead of me wasting my time, why don't you do what I did - and what the post suggested - and contact Baucus and Tester.  Ask them if this will impact Montana in any way.  Waste their time - not mine!  Win-win baby!

[ Parent ]
Then quit googling your ass, and read the regs (4.00 / 2)
If you'd look at the proposed regs, you'd see that GME (graduate medical expenses) will no longer be reimbursed by medicaid. GME's that no longer will be reimbursed may be those that UW students incur while working towards their degree during a placement in, say, an ER.

"CMS has previously allowed States to include hospital GME activities as a component of the cost of Medicaid inpatient and outpatient hospital services. For the reasons we explain in more detail below, we do not believe that it is consistent with the Medicaid statute to pay for GME activities either as a component of hospital services or separately. GME is not a health service that is included in the authorized coverage package. Nor is GME recognized under the Medicaid statute as a component of the cost of Medicaid inpatient and outpatient hospital services. GME is not a health service (in contrast to the activities of disproportionate share hospitals). Therefore, we are proposing in this issuance to preclude FFP in State payments for GME."


[ Parent ]
Wherever they go to school, they must also do rounds in a hospital (0.00 / 0)
not to mention a residency.  Hospitals that allow students to learn on premisis are able to bill a portion of their efforts to Medicaid. Very few hospitals are funded entirely through one source. It is simply too expensive to run a hospital. I don't know about the teaching hospitals in WA. Maybe they have some other system.

However, this is really beside the point. I assume, and presume that I am not being an ass by doing so, that Montanans have need of hospitals upon occasion and would not like to lose a major source of funding for them.

The fact that I am from New Mexico does not make this crisis less real. You should be glad that somebody cares enough to warn you.  If Baucus and Tester tell you you won't be effected, then they are not telling the truth.


[ Parent ]
PS. Thank you for calling them. n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I am not from California unless New Mexico (0.00 / 0)
has been annexed recently.

I am a county health and human services director in New Mexico who is extremely concerned that the new medicaid rules will make trauma coverage and other services inaccessible to many people. My state is sending a delegation of county health directors to DC next week. I have volunteered to work on alerting the public through blogs since the MSM has not been covering the issue.

I will be going to Fox News, camcorder man in tow, to ask them why they are not letting the public know. For your info, it is not only teaching hospitals that are jeopardized. Every public hospital or hospital that sees the uninsured, every school health program, services to the elderly and disabled...these programs are all in grave danger.

If you were really a Sentinel for your state, you would be paying attention and trumpeting this news from every mountain top.


[ Parent ]
Bush on access to health care: (4.00 / 1)

"I mean, people have access to health care in America. After all, you just go to an emergency room."

-- http://www.whitehouse.gov/news...

The hypocrite shows his true colors. We can't get this dangerous man out of office soon enough.  


boy...he's torpedoing his own health care "plan"... (4.00 / 1)
If ERs are going to be impacted, where are we going to go to get treated?

[ Parent ]
ERs.... (0.00 / 0)
are not the place for treatment of liberals. That's why they build asylums.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/i...


[ Parent ]
Well, if they disappear, they won't be there to treat (0.00 / 0)
wingnuts either. You'll have to go to the cemetery.

[ Parent ]
uh huh, (0.00 / 0)
and conservatives are going to pay the taxes to house all the liberals in asylums. Right.

Who are all you conservatives going to prey upon once you've had your liberal holocaust? Even hyena eat their own when they get hungry enough.

You'll make some nice shark bait, though.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox