Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

The Vetting of Hillary Clinton

by: JC

Thu Apr 03, 2008 at 11:36:28 AM MST


And here's to you, Mrs. Clinton...

The Clinton campaign would have us believe the nomination primary is all about taking a look at Barack Obama, and then deciding that ultimately he would not be electable in the fall. And of course, once we were done flirting with the young upstart, the Democrats should turn to Hillary because she is the heir apparent to the Democratic party's throne.

Flip this scenario for a moment--because in the hurry to vet Obama, and all of the attention that the Clinton campaign places on his inexperience or newness to the national political scene, they would have us forget that Hillary herself needs vetting. What better way to deflect the spotlight from one's own past and ambitions than to declare that another's youth and relative innocence on the national scene deserves the broader inspection.

And thank goodness she had a quality candidate in the form of Barack Obama who had the guts and perseverance to run against the "inevitable" candidacy of Hillary Clinton, and to give the campaign time and interest to vet her qualities as a president. If Clinton would have easily glided through the primary campaign without a formidable opponent, there is much that we would never had learned about her until it was too late, and the republicans and media had loaded their gattling guns with raw fodder. She and the American people should be glad that we finally get to see who Hillary under fire really is. If this vetting were to have happened during the general campaign with the Republican attack machine, Democrats worst fears of losing to McCain could have been realized.

If Barack Obama had not pressed her in the primary as hard as he has, Hillary would not have had to spoken to issues like her exaggerations about her foreign policy experience, or her true beliefs on NAFTA. We wouldn't have seen how shallow her judgement was in voting for the Iraq war, and how spineless she was in standing up to Bush' smoke and mirrors. We never would have seen how Bill Clinton could lower himself from the being the elder statesman of the party to engage in dirty political fisticuffs again--the likes of which the country hasn't seen in the modern political era.

Many people were worried about what Bill's place as First Gentleman in the White House would be, and he has revealed himself once again to be no gentleman. Bill Clinton will do much to destroy his presidential legacy, as historians reflect on his acts, veiled words and threats issued in the heat of the campaign, many of which were in stark contrast to the themes he carried through his first two terms.

One is left wondering about how the teamwork in the White House--that Hillary would have us believe led her to gain all that experience--would change once their roles were reversed. One just has to see and hear Bill on the campaign trail to understand that he isn't running to be the First Gentleman. Michelle Obama he is not, and Barack recently remarked at how it is difficult to tell who he is running against, sometimes.

He is running to be a full fledged partner in a co-presidency--the twofer that once was looked positively upon, as the prospect of a woman presidency became a possibility. Until the young upstart Barack Obama came along, that is, with a viable alternative candidacy. Bill Clinton is the quintessential four-termer looking to bend the rules in his quest for power, albeit one who no longer could can be impeached for malfeasance in office--the ultimate smokescreen behind which he could maintain his Cheney-esque drive for power.

I know what the definition of "is" is, and I have no need to watch a snarly politician from Arkansas waggle his finger at good people like Bill Richardson, admonishing them to play by the Clinton rule book, or pay the consequences of failed loyalty. I can see the 3am fight, as the phone rings, and both rush to answer it, ripping the cord out of the wall in the process.

So with Hillary's last-gasp determination to get the country to see, from the Clinton's view, that Obama cannot win, we get to see her and her husband for who they truly are. We get to see the nasty campaigning, cringing at the motherly "Shame on you Barack Obama" that we all hate to hear, our own mothers' chastisement for discovering sex for the first time ringing loudly in our ears. We have wondered how the shrill tactics would play over in a heated battle, and now we know. We need not hear shrill repetition replace thoughtful discourse in a diatribe over, say, Putin's influence in Iran. Shame on you Vladimir!

We get to hear how she puts words in her opponent's mouth and then demands that the public ask him to justify them. Strawman politics at its worst. We get rejoinders back to the politics of fear with the 3am ads. We get to see the negative side of Clinton in a campaign that she wishes had never been. We have become painfully aware of the lack of principled discourse her campaign has put forth; the inclusion of a political hack of the worst sort in the reliance of Mark Penn's slime machine. We get dream sequence retellings of events that never transpired; sniper fire nightmares.

As people have pointed to Obama's having come of age in this primary campaign at the hands of Hillary Clinton, we also need to note that her old-school politics are being retired by the parry of a deft youngster. One can only hope that her concession speech is followed by the lilting refrains from Mrs. Robinson: "We'd like to know a little bit about you for our files. We'd like to help you learn to help yourself." Hey, hey, hey.

I, for one, am glad that Clinton has stayed in the race long enough for the American people to finally get to see her for who she is. Much of what people have feared most about Clinton, though were willing to gloss over--the shrewd, cunning and calculating approach to politics she has--has blurbled to the top, leaving a cauldron of messy politics, desperately in need of tossing out.

Thank you Hillary and Bill Clinton, for letting us see you for who you truly are.

Coo-coo ca-choo

JC :: The Vetting of Hillary Clinton
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
LOL (0.00 / 0)
Thank you so much. I needed a laugh this morning. That's an interesting perception. People like an underdog, and trying to paint Barry as that is clever. I'm sure I've read you make the claim that Hillary has trailed him throughout the whole primary season. Indeed he has. Hillary has not ever given the perception that she is the front runner. That was left up to the media. Much like the media crowned Obama king after Iowa. New Hampshire served crow for dinner a few days later, but it's still been an uphill battle for her.

She fights hard. And I believe that is an issue to be brought up. How come Obama can't close the deal? Why can't he take her out? If everyone is calling for her to drop out then I must point out that it would be her giving the nomination to him because he can't do it on his own. Granted she hasn't been able to knock him out, but then again she's not on top. I love how people are calling for her to drop out right before the next couple of contests in which she would be favored to win.

Hillary Clinton has been vetted for years. Almost decades now. There really isn't much new to tell except for people like you to try to justify the past attacks. I'll concede that some of her attacks are a bit much, but at least she is doing them. Barry is hiding behind backers, and taking that defense. In this area I am a realist. I truly believe that if someone is going to back a candidate they might try to not be a douche bag about it.

Bill Clinton... Asking about what kind of influence he would have over her is the most idotic thing you could have said. What kind of fucking world are you living in where Democratic women are subservient to their husbands? I really don't see anything different Bill is doing that Elizabeth Edwards didn't do while John was running.

If you are going to attack him or her have something behind it. This was a really crappy post.


I hope you didn't blow too many chunks (0.00 / 0)
of Wheaties out of your nostrils over breakfast!  ;-)

While this post may have been a bit tongue in cheek, I still think that those Democrats who feel that Hillary Clinton has been vetted will be sorely disappointed to find that the Republicans will not agree, and that she will have to run the gauntlet, should she win the nomination. She should be grateful that Obama has lasted long enough to give her a good work out.

My intent was to point out that what is good for the goose is good for the gander--or in this case, what is good for the gander is good for the goose. Those who believe that Hillary Clinton has been vetted must remember that she has only run in one campaign previous to this one--her campaign for the Senate in NY, where she had virtually no competition, and was a shoo-in. She actually has had less election campaign vetting than Obama, who ran several contests in Illinois prior to his single Senate run, and also a failed run for the U.S. House in 2000.

And about  Gov. Rendell's exhortation yesterday that we don't know 50% of who Obama is, compared to only not knowing 10% of who Clinton is, I have this to say: I'd rather take a chance finding out what the 50% of a principled politician is, who has had little opportunity to be corrupted by Washington, than finding out what the 10% unknown is of a candidate that comes with a ton of D.C. baggage. That 10% can far outweigh Obama's 50%.

And to your question about attacking Bill Clinton, I only have one response, and a visceral one at that, that has risen to the forefront after his current behavior on the campaign trail reminds me of one thing: Impeachment! If Obama has his Rev. Wright, Hillary Clinton has the specter of Bill Clinton's impeachment hanging like a dark cloud over her campaign. Most Democrats have been hands-off this topic during the primary, but once the Republicans loose their attack machine, and the 527s get going, we'll be hearing more about wet-Willy's blue dress than we ever wanted to. I for one was finally glad to see Clinton leave office, as I was tired of hearing the whole gory tale over and over again. Spare us having to relive it once more, please Hillary?! If the republican's willingness to trounce Michelle Obama over her badly stated comment of pride in America is any indication, well, then it is going to be open season on Bill Clinton all the way to the election.


[ Parent ]
I don't eat Wheaties ;-) (0.00 / 0)
It won't work.

In my most honestly and humble opinion, I think attacking Bill Clinton for the scandal will work more in her benefit. It won't be about her, and people will see right through it. The Pubbies will have given up the high ground. The public will look at them as distracting from the real issues that are facing our country by ad"dress"ing crap that no ones gives a damn about now.

I remember campaign 2000. They tried to through everything at her. Anit-semetic, racist, sexist (the male sexist part). It was all crap. They'll try it again, but something that she has going for her is being in the public eye for 16 very long years. If something were to be tossed at her people won't buy it because we surely should have heard about it before now.  


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox