Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

It's Official Today, Jon -- Now How Will You Use This Opportunity?

by: Matt Singer

Thu Jan 04, 2007 at 09:21:31 AM MST


(Trying to bump this back to the top. - promoted by Matt Singer)

An open letter to Jon Tester.

Wow, Jon. It looks like this is actually going to happen. I still remember back in the early days of the campaign when we were the upstart. I remember the days roughly a year ago, when I'd officially left the campaign and gone full-time with Progressive States, and things looked bleak. I remember a handful of us keeping the faith, despite the pundits saying we couldn't win -- heck, despite some party staffers (who were supposed to be neutral) saying we couldn't win.

And I remember the corps of people who also were with you from the beginning -- the people who kept the faith during good times and hard times, who helped you raise money, reach new supporters, run volunteer field efforts, and do everything else we needed to do to win what briefly looked like an unwinnable race.

Matt Singer :: It's Official Today, Jon -- Now How Will You Use This Opportunity?
I remember that final fundraiser in Missoula that was standing room only, where the energy was palpable. I remember filling my car with highway signs and hitting the road to Billings for the last week to put the finishing touches on a field campaign started too late. I remember the momentum growing every night as each of our callers cranked hundreds of calls to Yellowstone Democrats.

And I remember on primary election night, waiting at the courthouse for Yellowstone results that I could phone in to HQ, but realizing after just the early returns that we had won. Sure, we were down by 11 points or so in early returns, but that was basically our goal for the final returns and we knew that we had the big mo'. Hours before, I had been ready to vomit from fear. A couple hours later, we were celebrating the biggest unanticipated landslide victory in memory.

Damn, that felt good. Didn't it?

Later, after the unity tour and the expansion of the campaign, I'll admit I was less involved. I figured we'd won you the backing of D.C. And since the D.C. cavalry was going to come out and take care of things, I figured I could turn my attention elsewhere.

But we came back when you needed us. And for that final week before Election Day, I went out on the doors religiously -- including through the rain on Election Day -- trying to turn out every warm-bodied Missoulian who we thought would vote for you.

I don't have to tell you that was a rougher election night. It sure made me glad that I was out on the doors, though.

But my point is this, Jon: My story isn't unique. I put hundreds or even thousands of hours of labor -- some paid, much of it free -- in to your campaign. I donated hundreds of dollars -- a lot of money by my standards. A lot of other people did that, too. A lot of other people who were with you in May of 2005 until November of 2006 and never had any doubt that you could do this job.

I'm writing this letter, though, because -- to be honest -- a lot of us feel pushed aside, like we're not to be trusted. It's a strange feeling when you get the impression that you can't be trusted by the campaign you gave a year-and-a-half of your life to. But that's the feeling I've been getting -- and I know, once again, that I'm not alone.

Why do I feel this way? Why do others who were among your earliest backers feel this way? Honestly, some of it is personnel decisions. It's nothing against any of them in particular, it's just that the team as a whole doesn't really share the values of the Jon I know. Early on in the campaign, we talked about fighting for the middle class and standing up on trade deals. Now your top policy person comes from a Senator who supported CAFTA, the bankruptcy bill, and full repeal of the estate tax. Last I checked, you didn't want to represent multi-national corporations, Wall Street, or the super-rich. Bridget may be wonderful. I have no idea. But I worry about anyone who spent six years with Bill Nelson.

I worry about what your team will be saying on policy. In the primary, you announced that you wanted a universal Children's Health Insurance Program. Will you be signing on to one soon? What's your big goal on energy -- you'll be on the committee and it's an issue that you care about deeply. If a bankruptcy bill comes up and we can repeal that attack on working families, will you oppose it the way we did in the campaign?

You need a staff that has people at the top who share your values and whose first concern is for you and whether they are running the office the way you would want to. That means that they share your priorities -- even if your priority isn't getting re-elected. Otherwise, on these big decisions, the fight will be non-stop between you and your staff. And while there should be disagreements on the staff and between you and the staff, I want to avoid everything being a battle for you.

You also need a staff that realizes that this race was won as much by the first 3,000 votes you got as it was by the last 3,000 votes you got. The people I know who came together early on to say you could do this are some of the smartest, hardest working people I know in this game. And, unless I'm wrong, it seemed like you enjoyed our company quite a bit, too.

You know me, Jon. I've got a lot of faith in you as a person and as a policymaker. You're now in a place I don't fully understand and that I think it'll take some adjusting to on your end. Beyond that, I hope you know that I am loyal to you -- probably to a fault. I wouldn't be writing this if I wasn't worried. And I wouldn't be writing this if I wasn't hearing from a lot of other people who worked hard for you -- making phone calls, pounding pavement -- that they are also worried.

Do right by Montana, Jon. And do right by your values.

We'll see you around,
Matt

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Thanks, Matt (0.00 / 0)
You indeed speak for many, and do so well.

We all elected Jon Tester--not just Party insiders (4.00 / 1)
We watch with hope and trepidation as Senator Tester begins his term. Our best wishes go with him--but also deep hopes for his continuing committment to a populist progressive and practical program and that his office will be open to all the constituents for whom he works and who elected him in Montana.  His election is not the result of a few political operatives' machinations or the dollars poured in from the Washington D.C lobbyists that old DLC  consultants think bought and won this election.

This was not a landslide, and Sen Tester & his family,  and campaign and every single person, interest group and grassroots effort who came together in this immense undertaking are responsible for the crucial and slim difference that placed him in office.

Note to Tester staff: Grassroots activism only can exist when it is given the respect and credit it is due after such a trial.  Cynical operatives like Matt McKenna should study the lessons of humility and not have an exaggerated perspective of his part in this great victory.  Does he want to poison the deep well and destroy any continuing activism and good feeling that this election has generated back in Montana? Beware of the ring of power.


tester's responsibility to his constituents (0.00 / 0)
  I too am concerned with Jon's Staff choices, in particular with Matt McKenna, who, as Jon's spokesperson, announced to a major magasine editor in New York that (and I can't quote verbatum but only what he said) - all those artists and writers and intellectuals and movie stars in Livingston and Park County, who have a seriously inflated sense of their own importance, had nothing to do with getting Jon elected.
  Perhaps we do have inflated senses of our own importance, those of us who organised fundraisers both during the primary and main campaign, and who drove around putting up yard signs, and called all our friends and asked them to give Jon money, and scraped the bottoms of our pockets for whatever we ourselves could afford to give, but one of the best parts of Jon's campaign, at the beginning at any rate, was that so many of us who had felt disenfranchised for so long in this dark night of the American soul, felt empowered and energized and enthused about something we felt could make a real difference. Empowerment and,as voters, a "seriously inflated sense of one's own importance" is what makes individuals in a democracy rise to action.  It is a good thing and not something to sneer at, especially seeing as young Matt is supposed to speak for Jon.
  I pray from the bottom of my heart that Senator Tester keeps his promise to work for the end of the war in Iraq, to fight against the Patriot Act, and to restore the civil liberties of this country's citizens. We love the guy but it can't hurt to remind him that it was the progressives in this state who put him where he is right now, not the tired old hack compromisers who spout the conservative wing of the Democratic Party"s party line.
  I'm a little anxious, there have been some not so good signs coming from the Tester camp, but lets all remember, he's just getting sworn in today and we will have no idea what he's going to do until some votes come up where his mettle will be tested.  Let's give him all our support for now. Supporting elected representatives when they do the right thing is just as important a part of participatory democracy as chiding them when they are wrong.

Thanks, Matt, for your wisdom (0.00 / 0)
A friend said to me that there are two kinds of people that go into politics; those who want to change the world and those who want a job; a position.  The second type is far needier than the first. Yes, Kropotkin, like Smeagol in the Ring Trilogy. "Smeagol soon developed many undesirable qualities, like stealing, eavesdropping, and being sneaky whenever he had the opportunity. It was these qualities which got him banished from his household. Cursing his bad luck and his family, he eventually made his way to a gloomy den underneath the Misty Mountains. Living in darkness, he grew to hate the light of the sun and moon, but the moon he would tolerate." 
The majority of those who worked hard for Jon in both the primary when he was considered the underdog and worked even harder for him in the general, did it because we believed,as Margot Kidder said at an incredible fundraiser, "It's a joy to vote FOR someone and not against someone."  Jon hit it out of the park in Park that night in one of the most conservative counties in Montana.  The firefighters, Margie, her daughter Maggie, Chris had assembled rich and poor, farmers and ranchers, Republicans, punk disc jockeys, school teachers...I never saw such a mix.  He spoke of economic fairness, the war, the Patriot Act, women's choice... It was a good night filled with good solid salt of the earth folk who all came away that night with "an big sense of pride" in raising over $30,000 and filling the room to an overflow crowd. Is that an "exaggerated sense of importance" or is it what has always brought America back from the brink of revolution;  A sense of belonging;  a sense of community;  a sense of having a seat at the table;  to be given a voice.

A staffer that ridicules people who have their heart in the right place and whose only crime is that they are smart, or creative or wealthy, is a cynic.  John Edwards said that "Optimists built America, not cynics."  Cynics have had their day in the sun and my hope is that they will have to abide like Smeagol in the political darkness for many years to come.
Unless I have lost all my senses, Jon will be a man of the light. A man who will grow to be a statesman and not a mere politician. A man who told me that he shared my concern about the horrible trade agreements that have gotten us into near economic collapse.  The appointments are worrisome but the votes will soon tell the tale.  Best wishes to both Jon and Sharla.  I am proud to have been part of a great campaign.  My hats off to all the people that I met along the journey.
 


power corrupts (0.00 / 0)
Yes, Mr. Mckenna has begun to eerily remind me of Gollum--the Smeagol who sacrificed his soul to have and hold the "one ring to bind them."  His behavior is a reminder and lesson to all: there are some who are attracted to politics not because of the strengths in their character, but because of their weaknesses--they must act out the "will to power" (Nietzsche) over others as validation to support their false superiority complex. They succumb to hubris and arrogance and the misguided belief that shrewdness reflects intelligence.  None of this matters if there is no heart.

[ Parent ]
Not so fast (0.00 / 0)
I think it's a little early for anyone to offer a verdict on the Senator-elect's performance or that of any of his staff.  It definitely too early to make any character judgements. 

[ Parent ]
Point of order (0.00 / 0)
"Senator-elect" is no longer appropriate

[ Parent ]
Knocks forehead (0.00 / 0)
Doh, you're right.  The post holidays rush has left my brain in a haze.

[ Parent ]
not good (1.00 / 1)
I remember a handful of us keeping the faith, despite the pundits saying we couldn't win -- heck, despite some party staffers (who were supposed to be neutral) saying we couldn't win.

Accountability?


haha (0.00 / 0)
There is no accountability in the campaign world (well, very little).  Look at some of these vaunted consultants that have been crapping the bed in national races for decades now. 

[ Parent ]
I remember Matt, wet as a rat - - (1.00 / 1)
"He looks familiar" I thought, and he introduced himself as (simply) Matt.  Kinda funny when you think of your involvment, dude.... ;-)

Well said.

Best wishes to you Senator Jon Tester of Montana - on the hope and the prayers of not just the people of Montana, but of lots of others elsewhere too.



Now wait a second (0.00 / 0)
Before we totally dump on this parade lets keep some things in mind.

1. Let’s wait and see what his full staff looks like once he moves out of the Dirksen basement.
2. We know the likes of Schriock and Lombardi and I think we all agree they are solid progressives.
3. We loved McKenna when he was throwing out damaging missives on Burns, don’t throw in under the bus just yet.
4. He hasn’t even had the job for 24 hours.

But rest assured Senator Tester, this post has resonated with quite a few folks.  A lot of hard working, simple people got involved in an election for the first time in their entire lives because of the hope you gave them.  Many people had never written a check to a candidate before you came along.  Go home and read that stump speech the night before you make your first Senate speech, those words still echo in many ears here in Montana; honor them.


Missives (0.00 / 0)
A lot of people had a problem with the spokesmen this cycle -- and partly rightfully so.  We were struggling in Montana under a kind of microscopic scrutiny that we've never before experienced.  When playing to that kind of audience, the meaningless two-line quote was par for the course.

Matt McKenna and Jason Klindt had tough shoes to fill. Did I skip over their comments when reading the Gazette and Tribune every morning? Well yes... I might fault Klindt for having bad political judgment, but I'm not about to make any claims about his or McKenna's intentions. 


[ Parent ]
An example of a postive spokesperson (0.00 / 0)
On Edwards and Labor from todays's Congressional Quarterly:

And another difference, Kusnet said, was Edwards’ experience on the picket line. “Other than Jesse Jackson [the longtime African-American activist], I don’t think there anybody who’s run for president who’s made themselves that visible in day-to-day union work,” he said.

Jennifer Palmieri, a spokeswoman for Edwards, said it’s all part of the candidates’ commitment to solving poverty. “That is part of what makes him a more seasoned candidate who is very clear about why he’s in this race,” she said.

I was not one of the "we" that liked the missives.  I am on record as saying that we should leave the Abramhoff scandal to the press.  The Montana Press was lauded by dailykos and other blogs for its fearless and almost flawless reporting of Burns' shenanigans and gaffes.  I felt that the MDP could use their work occasionally, but the daily attack began to turn people against the Democrats.  We offered not much in the postive.
In my town, I had Democrats almost stay home because they were so sick of the negative ads. One big contributor and a person who manned the telephones in the bus in Billings for Tester said, that if she saw that picture of Abramhoff in that black hat one more time, she was staying home.  And I had friends that actually did stay home.  50% of Americans don't vote.  It's because the whole process has become a cesspool.  Public Financing of campaigns will rid our airwaves and mailboxes of a good many of this crap.  There is a better way.  This past election was  an eye opener that old campaign tactics should be relegated to the dust heap along with the consultants.  I'm with Sirota on this.  "Call Me Rebel".
If you want to see how to skewer your opponent with finesse , check out www.johnedwards.com


[ Parent ]
Hiya SENATOR Jon Tester! (0.00 / 0)
Wow!  Felt pretty darn good to call you that finally.  Jon, just remember one thing and one thing only.  And it's this.  There's a whole lot of dumb bastards back there in D.C.  GREEDY dumb bastards.  So, GIVE THEM BASTARDS HELL!  That's all you have to do.  They're not like us.  They're not normal people.  They're sickos.  They're simply greedy bastards.  And their greed motivates everything thing they do.  They need to be held accountable, whether they are part of the military industrial complex, the insurance industry, of the oiligarchy, or whatever.  These bastards need to be reined in!  So, Mr. Senator (Damn! How does a guy from Big Sandy get to be a U.S. senator?!), give those greedy bastards hell, and let the chips  fall where they may!  And by God you'll be the best damn senator we've EVER had! And one more thing, Jon, since you gettin' lots of free advice here tonight.  Keep that big Montana smile on your face at all times.  Hell, there's NUTHIN' more intimidating than gettin' your ass kicked REAL good by a big guy that's smilin' at you the whole time!  Cause you just KNOW that he's enjoyin' the hell out of it!  And when you're done whuppin' ass, you can come back home to Montana, the place we all love.  Good luck, amigo!

A first ever .... (0.00 / 0)
Wow, this post actually made me react in a more heartfelt way than, well, any other I have yet to read on this blog.

A first ever .... there are so many comments about this post, most of you worked on this campaign during the primary, during the election etc.

A first ever ...well, this was my first ever. THIS WAS the first time I volunteered for a candidate and committed my energy towards a person's cause. Why? Beacause I actually believed in his ability, I believed in his message, I believed in his committment to Montana Citizens and I still believe.

I have also heard about the frustrations about who will be the staffers, the men/women behind Tester in D.C. Skills matter, so does committment to Jon, so does belief in Jon's values, so does closeness to Jon's heart.

D.C. is a rat race. That doesn't mean Jon should hire those familiar with the rat race. Rat Race in that case = sell out.

People in Montana elected Jon because his message was simple, honest, and connected with common citizens. Whoever Jon hires, they must be the same.

Thank you Matt for being the honest, supportive person you are of Jon's efforts. Matt is not being rude, he's being honest and more of us need to be that way.


Give the staff a chance to do their jobs. (0.00 / 0)
Singer, you did work hard.  Thanks for doing your part.  I'm sure our Senator will represent you well in Washington, even if some of his new staffs' worldviews do not completely align to yours.

While I understand where you're coming from, I think its a little premature to imply that the new staff don't have the best interests of Montana in mind.

And to the comments that specifically call out McKenna, the new communications director, I have to say that McKenna has put in his time working hard to elect progressive candidates. He's qualified and dedicated. I'm not familiar with his comments that Margot referenced, and I certainly think the good people of Park County deserve props, but McKenna did a great job managing the campaign message.  He's a good guy, from Montana, who knows the issues and is on our side. 

Many of us worked hard to get Tester to Washington- let's give his new staff a chance to do their jobs.


Trust, but Verify (0.00 / 0)
After I wrote this, a friend of mine from across the country dropped me an email that just said "I bet a few people in Illinois wish they had written this when Barack Obama was just entering the Senate."

Jon and his staff have a job. I appreciate that. I've got one, too. I'm not scared of doing my job.


[ Parent ]
point well taken (0.00 / 0)
You watch the staff appointments more closely than I do.  I'm not critical of the original post.  Peace out.

[ Parent ]
Define progressive (0.00 / 0)
Not to beat a dead donkey--but I must beg to differ about Mr. McKenna's work for "progressive" candiates and whether that is confidence inspiring---if you think (among his past campaigns & employers) Max Baucus, Zell Miller (remember him?--the so-called "Democrat" who spoke at the 2004 Republican Presidential Convention), Mary Landrieu, and Nelson of Nebraska are "progressive" then we have wildly differing ideas about what that term means.

[ Parent ]
well, go ahead and beat it (0.00 / 0)
Kropotkin, I probably know you, but don't recognize your cryptic name.  Hi, anyways. Next time we're enjoying a beer together, mention the Ring of Power. It will be our little code for Tester-staff-are-going-to-screw-us-all-for-love-of-power-and-money.

If you have questions about Matt's creds or his positions on the issues, ask him.  He's worked hard in his young career to help elect Democrats, which is often a challenge in our great state.  Is he a progressive?  Ask him.  He worked for Steve Dougherty, for example.

And, just as Matt is not a progressive by association with me (I am, thank you, and I'm comfortable with my own political persuasion), he is not necessarily a sell-out conservative because... he did what for Zeb Miller? 

I mean really, why so much emphasis on one staffer?  Do you have particularly damning info about the guy (other than he's a bobcat)? 

And can't you admit you're a little dramatic with the freakin' gollum references? 

Anyway, keep on reading mid-century fantasy.  Good for your health.  And my blog-reading pleasure.


[ Parent ]
sorry, Zell Miller. (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Yes, we need another discussion on progressivism. (0.00 / 0)
There was a great discussion over on mydd.com and with Kilgore on "How to define Progressive." Some just use it as another term for "liberal" which has been demonized by the right.  But by any definition, no one would put Zell Miller, Mary Landrieu or Ben Nelson in the progressive corner or Max, for that matter if you are using the more modern definition of those who fight the power of the status quo of corporate governance.  Fair Trade, workers' rights, middle class help, equal rights, affirmative action,ending poverty, reducing our prison population, single payer healthcare.... Let's start to define who is and isn't a progressive.

 


[ Parent ]
Letter to Jon Tetser (0.00 / 0)
I thought it was people like me, the people who wouldn't vote for him that were supposed to worry about what Senator Tester does next, not his friends.

I'm willing to wait & see. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. After all, it's not like we have any choice, do we?


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Purely Hypothetical, of course, but - The best candidate for the Republicans for US Senate is:
Corey Stapleton
Dennis Rehberg
Marc Racicot
Champ Edmunds
Steve Daines
Harris Himes
Kreyton Kerns

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox