Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Iraq: Like a Quagmire, But Worse

by: V

Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 12:54:02 PM MST


There is some coverage in many of the National newspapers today (and has been for most of this week and last) of Pelosi's strategy to bring Bush to his knees over Iraq.  They all fall under a title like the Globe's, "Pelosi vows no 'blank check' on Iraq funds: Wants Bush to justify use of additional troops."  Am I the only one uncomfortably dissatisfied, that this is all that our strong progressive victory has rought?  Honestly, I cannot even imagine that this was not expected of President Bush, even under a Republican Congress.

Most of the Representatives must have read the reports about how ineffective a surge will be and how very much opposed to John "Escalation" McCain's plan the American people are.  The gazette reprints an EJ Dionne opinion today, that discusses this "No Blank Checks" plan as a paper tiger, considering modern American warfare, and the consolidation of power in executive hands. 

Consolidation is really what this post is about.  I am not a military scholar, and though I have felled many opponents on the blood-stained fields of Risk, I doubt that really qualifies me as a military strategist--though, I suppose it is possible that President Bush is using die to determine his next strategerific move in Iraq.  I do know something about how this American government was devised and intended to run.  Not much, but something is better than nothing.  The legislative and executive branches were supposed to be jealous paramours of the full power of the United States and opponents for its affection.  They were to guard what they had without yeilding, despite similarities of party or faith between branches. 

These days, that sort of government seems fanciful.  The legislative is at the beck and call  of the executive, and the strongest defiance would be to force President Bush to justify our spending in Iraq (deep intake of underwhelmed breath).  I have a suggestion for the Pelosi and the Democratic-controlled legislative: Stop playing footsie with the executive and grow the ovarios y cajones to take back what is yours.  The power of the purse should not be a paper tiger.

The best part of this plan is that it is not really partisan.  Denny should be just as anxious to protect the power of the legislative as Max or Jon.  That tension is part of his elected duty.

Update -- touchstone has a great post on topic as well.

V :: Iraq: Like a Quagmire, But Worse
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I 'm a pacifist but... (0.00 / 0)
So you know I don't even step on spiders, but I'm not in favor of just pulling the plug on this thing.  I don't think this represents anyone bowing to the executive branch.  It represents just how touchy this situation is.  It is no different then starting impeachment procedings, which I also think would be the worst idea in the world, even though the Pres and his cronies appear to be criminal.

I don't know whether there are only two choices, ie pull out and pray or fight for 30 years, but one thing is quite certain.  Iran will increase in size if we come home now, and if it takes more troops and more money to stop that from happening, then we need to do that or find something else to burn in our cars pronto.


Politics 101 (0.00 / 1)
I would not go touting a "progressive" win as many moderate Democrats were also elected that contribute to the slim left-ist majority.  I think that little to nothing will actually change aside from Pelosi's generally outragous remarks going in the newspaper from page 15 to page 4 (front cover in the Independent). 

Iraq, the horror, the horror (0.00 / 0)
  The London Independent broke a story this weekend that filled in in detail the deals made by Exxon, BP, Shell et al to divvy up the profits from the Iraqi oil feild.  The foreign companies get 70% of the profits from Iraqi oil until they "re-coup their investment" (you can bet there'll be some creative accounting THERE) and then twenty percent for the next thirty years.  For the deal to be legitimized it has to be voted on by an Iraqi government with its own constitution. (Think of all those purple fingers unwittingly putting their stamp on a deal that robs their country of its only major source of income and giving it to the countries that bombed them back to the stone age.)  The vote, if one can call it that seeing as we pretty much control this government, comes up in the Iraqi parliament this week.
  Is it too far fetched to figure the Iraqi people will be hopping mad when they find this latest betrayal out? Is it too far fetched to think there might, just might, be a connection between an anticipated surge in violence in Iraq and the American troop surge? Hello.
  None of this, of course, has been reported in the AMerican Media. God forbid they should say anything negative about our wonderfully civic minded oil companies, or suggest that Georgie's war was fought for oil.
  For further info on the deal go to the U.K. Independent online.  ANd for some great reporting on the carving up of Iraq and giving it to US and British companies try and get some old Nation Magasine articles on the subject.
  We must, all of us, in unity with all of the other Peace Groups around Montana, flood the Baucus/Tester/Rehberg offices with mail in passionate opposition to the escalation of this war and to funding for that escalation.  We are not fixing anything over there, we are making it worse, and over seventy percent of Iraqis want us out no matter what the consequences. It is their country, not ours. It is their oil, not ours.

When grocery stores have no food... (0.00 / 0)
It is definitely true that it is their country and their oil, but if the entire region descends into chaos, we will see an economic collapse like nothing the world has ever seen.  I agree with you that our presence is morally wrong and the oil companies are charlatans, but do you really want to give up your entire standard of living, i.e. dependable food sources and any kind of leisure time?  This is like a house of cards on a tray table in a 747. 

We need to restore diplomacy and admit to the world we screwed up.  We need help.  Recently, several Senators have travelled to the Middle East to do just that.  We can't just bring everybody home.  That's why so many of us knew it was stupid to go in the first place.  Yes people have died.  But it's nothing like what will happen if we just leave and stop spending money.  People will die there and they will die here.  The solution is global.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox