Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Ron Paul on Montana Ballot

by: Matt Singer

Sun Sep 07, 2008 at 13:54:08 PM MST


Here's some interesting news. The Constitution Party of Montana, which disaffiliated from the U.S. Constitution Party, has submitted Ron Paul as their nominee, which means that Ron Paul's name will be on the Montana ballot as an option for voters.

The names that will be on the ballot as far as I can tell:
PartyPresidential CandidateVP Candidate
ConstitutionRon PaulMichael Peroutka
DemocraticBarack ObamaJoe Biden
IndependentRalph NaderMatt Gonzalez
LibertarianBob BarrWayne Allyn Root
RepublicanJohn McCainSarah Palin
Ron Paul is a big enough name in enough of Montana that this could cause some trouble for John McCain.

In the GOP primary, Paul drew over 20,000 votes. Consider the closely fought 2006 Senate race, ultimately decided by 3,500 votes and 20,000 votes could be a big deal, especially if Bob Barr (a more credible nominee than the Libertarians have had in some time) pulls the same 1,700 votes the Libertarians drew in '04.

By means of comparison, Nader and the Green nominee combined in '04 received about 7,000 votes total in Montana.

All told -- this could be about a 14,000 net vote advantage for the Ds, just based on the other names on the ballot.

Also -- this is a canny move for the Constitution Party. They'll actually have a statewide candidate with some name recognition. The way election law works in Montana, I think this almost guarantees ongoing ballot access for them.

Note: so far the only source for Paul's name being filed appears as a news item from Ballot Access News, which has always had good info in the past. But there's nothing in the local papers or on the SOS website to verify this information.

Count me as very curious to hear others' takes on this news.

Matt Singer :: Ron Paul on Montana Ballot
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I like your thinking, Matt, but ... (0.00 / 0)
I'm not sure that if Ron Paul's name isn't on the ballot that Paul supporters would automatically vote for McCain.  

I attended a couple Paul events in Missoula and many in the crowd were young voters looking for alternatives to the status quo candidates.  They were anti-war, government-off-our-back, pro-pot, time-for-a-change voters.  Perhaps when they compare the two major candidates, they'll lean Obama -- not all of them but many -- that is if these voters are true to their anti-establishment roots.

This is just an observation and not based on any data.    


That's a good point (0.00 / 0)
And it certainly won't be a one-to-one. Of course, Nader voters won't come exclusively from Obama, either.

Paul's strong supporters are almost exclusively hard-right though -- and exactly the sort of person that Palin was in part supposed to shore up.  


[ Parent ]
I really doubt that Nader and Greens (0.00 / 0)
will get 7,000 votes again this year. Many past Nader voters (myself included), will tend to look at how close the Montana vote between McCain and Obama will be, and vote accordingly. I know that personally, a 3rd party vote when the election isn't even close is a nice way to protest the status quo candidates. But I think that Nader, with his perennial campaign, has become status quo and generates little excitement.

Question is... (0.00 / 0)
how much of that mindset settles in on the right as well.

[ Parent ]
you have to think... (0.00 / 0)
...with the current Republican party being anathema to a lot of these Paul-bearers that they'll be more likely to vote for their guy rather than work to prop up McCain.

Another question is, we always assume a lot of these third-party voters are stealing votes from the major candidates, and not just coming out to the polls to vote for their guy. I suspect a number of Paul-bearers might not have otherwise voted in this race...


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox