| User Blox 4 |
|
- Put stuff here
|
Barack Obama  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.
|
|
by:
V
Thu Jan 25, 2007 at 13:50:02 PM MST
|
| The NYT has an editorial today highlighting one possible reason for the Bush Administration's forced retirement plan for some USAs. Again, the authour does not mention that most of the retirements are in the Ninth Circuit, though he or she highlights an odd specific reason for one of these replacements:
The federal investigation into Congressional corruption is approaching a crucial deadline and potential dead end. Feb. 15 is the last day on the job for United States Attorney Carol Lam of San Diego, the inquiry's dedicated prosecutor, who is being purged by the Bush administration.
Her investigation led to the imprisonment of former Representative Randy Cunningham, the California Republican who took millions of dollars in bribes in exchange for delivering lucrative government contracts. But just as Ms. Lam was digging into other possible wrongdoing, the White House decided to force her from office without explanation.
Hmmmn. I wonder...
Ms. Lam has been investigating the dealings of Brent Wilkes, a private contractor and deep-pocketed political contributor who was designated co-conspirator No. 1 in the Cunningham case. Mr. Wilkes developed other cozy relationships. Among other avenues, the inquiry has been looking into rich government contracts secured by corporations and lobbyists with ties to Representative Jerry Lewis - the former appropriations chairman - and his staff. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Mr. Wilkes could be indicted before Ms. Lam leaves office. The question now is whether her successor, as yet unnamed, will pursue the inquiry with the same dedication or will quietly smother it.
The outlook isn't promising.
Possibly more damning than this:
[Attorney] General Alberto Gonzales is refusing to provide Congress with details on these unmerited dismissals. He insists that there's no attempt to quash fresh Republican scandals and says only the "very best" will be named as replacements.
I second the call that this article ends with. Congress should be making this odd occurrence its business. Democrat and Republican leaders in Congress should be asking questions, but not alone. Rather than writing an editorial, the NYT should be digging deeper and asking questions. This way constituents may take more interest--particularly in this climate of anti-corruption--and force their representatives to take action. |
| V :: Forced Retirement in San Diego |
|
|
| Poll |
| Voting. Useful or not? |
|
|
|
Results
|
|