I have to take issue with Debra Saunders' sophist op-ed, likening Tea-baggers' form of protest and speech with anti-war activists during the Bush administration and its decision to invade Iraq. To wit:
When Boxer grilled Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice about what personal price the childless Rice paid for the Iraq war, Boxer later boasted that she was "speaking truth to power." But when angry voters try to do the same with elected officials, whether they're heckling them or just showing up, Boxer wants the media to investigate.
It's laughable: Democrats discrediting protests because - ooooooh - they're organized. Last year, weren't these same folks guffawing about Jesus being a community organizer?
This kind of "they-did-it-too" dodge plays especially well to traditional media outlets, with their predilection towards he-said-she-said style of "objectivity." It's especially specious because the two kinds of protest are not at all alike.
The Tea Baggers are not heroically standing up for freedom - they're operating under false premises, that the health care reform means sending babies and elderly off to die in the grinding machinery of socialized medicine.
The protests are based on lies created and spread - not by community organizers - but by political operatives and popular television pundits and intended to end discourse, not foster openness and accountability.
That's quite a different cry from the anti-war movement, which was grossly ignored by the media, but essentially based on truths the media were reluctant to acknowledge. (Wasn't Saunders here during the Bush administration? Doesn't she remember the real depredations committed by our government, not the fantastical, illusory crimes birthed in the lurid, molten imagination of Glenn Beck?) And certainly no one would claim that Code Pink for all of its stunts actually shut down discussion the war -- right?
No one's calling for the Tea Baggers to be silent. Dissent is patriotic. But bullying people at rallies, shouting down other points of view, silencing debate? - that's not patriotic. |