Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Clinton on health care reform

by: Jay Stevens

Fri Aug 14, 2009 at 06:03:37 AM MST


Good times last night. I wouldn't call Clinton a great speaker -- he pretty much winged a good bit of his talk -- but it was lively and interesting, and he again demonstrated he's hard to fluster, handling a few hecklers savagely...

Anyhow. He talked about a lot, but I thought I'd related some comments he made about health care reform, seeing as they're, you know, relevant here at this blog...and these are just based on notes I took last night...

Town Hall demonstrations are meant to terrify moderate and conservative Democrats: the GOP isn't strong or relevant enough to defeat bill...

Three hurdles for health care reform: (1) It's complex. Can't explain it easily to voters. (2) The CBO doesn't reckon long-term costs and savings, so the bill's been slammed by its estimates. (3) It's hard to budge the status quo. "People who already have something are certain what they'll lose. People who don't are uncertain about what they'll gain."

Health care reform is not only morally right, it's imperative, politically, for Democrats.

After a bill is signed, approval for the reform will go up because Americans are an optimistic people. After a year or so, when the effects are felt, approval will explode. Get something done.

In one of the more interesting turns in the talk was when Clinton addressed his own efforts at reform. He talked about how "the victors wrote the history" on his efforts, citing two aspects:

-- Claim: The bill was a 1,000-page-+ monstrosity. Complex and unwieldy. Reality: proposed bill was a simplification of existing code on health care, actually cut more than 400 pages from the original law.
--Claim: The effort failed b/c the administration dictated the bill, didn't allow Congress to write it. Reality: House committee chair (Hoyer?) asked the administration to write the bill, b/c he worried that Congressional reps didn't know enough about the issue, and that they'd be picked off one-by-one by lobbyists...

In short, if this effort fails, that's the kiss of death for reform. Those that defeated the bill will write the reasons why. (Right now, that's the Tea Bagger crowd. I imagine the media will say Americans don't want a government insurance solution...)

That is, it's imperative to something passed...

Jay Stevens :: Clinton on health care reform
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Clinton's 1994 bill would have been a nail in the coffin of reform ... (0.00 / 0)
This is so typically Clinton - the framework he puts up is that his bill was a good bill defeated by bad guys. It was a bad bill written to benefit big bad guys and defeated by little bad guys. Had it passed, we'd all be all be under the thumb of Travelers and a few other large health insurance companies (even more so than now), who would be leeching off the system just as they are now. We'd be frozen too, just as we are now with Medicare D.

"Harry and Louise" was a successful propaganda campaign to undermine the bill. It was put forward by small health insurance companies who were cut out of the Clinton bill. And that was his critical error - he should have bought them all off, instead of just the big ones.

Clintonite.  


dude... (0.00 / 0)
I didn't say any of this...it's all Clinton.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox