Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Good Thing We're Listening to These Folks

by: Matt Singer

Thu Mar 01, 2007 at 13:30:20 PM MST


Max is organizing a big old meeting with a bunch of corporate representatives to discuss fast track. While his staff assure me that the corporate folks are being treated no better than the labor folks were (we're setting the bar awfully low here, guys), I thought this info that landed in my inbox this morning was helpful.

The five main speakers at this Democratic Policy Conference have a decidedly pro-GOP giving history:

Cargill

2003-2004
Republicans: $154,385 (77%)
Democrats: $46,115 (23%)
Total: $200,500

2005-2006
Republicans: $174,590 (79%)
Democrats: $46,410 (21%)
Total: $221,000

Caterpillar

2003-2004
Republicans: $278,476.55 (89%)
Democrats: $34,418.45 (11%)

2005-2006
Republicans: $398,362.44 (84%)
Democrats: $75,878.56 (16%)
Total:  $474,241

Kodak

2003-2004
Republicans: $88,875 (75%)
Democrats: $29,625 (25%)
Total: $118,500

2005-2006
Republicans: $89,979.75 (63%)
Democrats: $52,845.25 (37%)
Total: $142,825

New York Life

2004-2005
Republicans: $257,040 (54%)
Democrats: $218,960 (46%)
Total: $476,000

2005-2006
Republicans: $517,951.75 (47%)
Democrats: $573,053 (52%)
Total:  $1,102,025

Wal-Mart

2003-2004
Republicans: $1,308,060 (78%)
Democrats: $368,940 (22%)

2005-2006
Republicans: $1,013,223.96 (71%)
Democrats: $413,852.04 (29%)

Ari Berman has a new profile of Max in The Nation that is definitely worth a read. I've written before and I'll write again about my frustrations with my Senior Senator. We're both Democrats, sure, but we're definitely from different parts of the 'big tent.'

And while the Senator's staff tells me they're being responsive to their 'allies,' one of Berman's sources tells a different story:

A provision in the bill, reportedly slipped in by Grassley, that encourages employers to contract with staff leasing companies, making it harder to unionize temporary human resources employees, particularly angered the coalition of labor groups that supported the House version. "The Finance Committee operates like there's been no election," says one labor leader.
Consider also this paragraph:
Taxes are not the only issue on which Baucus parts from the majority of his colleagues. In early January he wrote an editorial in the Wall Street Journal calling on Democrats to renew Bush's fast-track authority for international trade deals. Given that most Democrats elected in 2006 campaigned against agreements like NAFTA and CAFTA, the editorial was a provocative move. Byron Dorgan, chair of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee, took the unusual step of rebuking Baucus in a letter to the Journal. "There is, indeed, a growing Democratic consensus on trade--but in the opposite direction," Dorgan wrote. The chairman of the taxation committee in the Montana Senate went further, passing almost unanimously a resolution urging Baucus to oppose fast-track authority.
Of course, things might look a little differently if Senator Jim Elliott (the chair of the tax committee) raised money here in Montana the same way Senator Baucus raises money back in Washington. Fortunately, he doesn't (and neither do the 43 other members of the Montana Senate who supported the resolution). No doubt, that's making some Friends of Max Baucus very nervous, friends like these:
In recent years Baucus has not been shy about reaching out to K Street for campaign contributions. In February 2005 he asked fifty lobbyists to raise $100,000 each for his 2008 re-election campaign. Two lobbyists who attended told CNN that they "have never gotten such an aggressive pitch from a senator."
Matt Singer :: Good Thing We're Listening to These Folks
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Baucus' digressions are exhausing... (0.00 / 0)
as of late.

But aside from that, did anyone notice this:  Every single one of those you listed gave more money in '05-'06 than they did in '03-'04.

Hedging bets?  Not the best thing to point out, I guess.  Republicans always get more money, though, regardless of who's in office. 

Too long election periods.  Too much money needed.  Sometimes I'm convinced the British system is better.  At least we'd of been rid of Bush by now if that were the case, no?


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox