Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

On the Flathead Lake boat crash

by: Jay Stevens

Tue Sep 01, 2009 at 19:13:24 PM MST


I haven't written much, if anything, about the Flathead boat crash involving Dennis Rehberg and Greg Barkus. It's a little too early to work on a political angle, IMHO - not with Dustin Frost still in the hospital with a brain injury of unknown severity. And while I wouldn't wish harm or injury even to those I strongly dislike, Frost is, by all accounts, a very decent guy (here's a nice profile), which makes this all the more troubling. I also know some of his family; better people you couldn't hope to meet, and my thoughts have been with them since I learned Dustin was on the boat and injured. And I have to admit, having a personal tie to the story made reading the excited comments immediately following a little difficult. After all, these are real people going through a real crisis.

And because whatever I would say about the crash on this site or the b'birds would be perceived as a political attack on Rehberg, I've avoided saying much of anything, outside of a few Tweets.

But things got a little weird. So here I am.

First shout-down goes to Erik Iverson who has, since day one, been running flak and treating this like a political story. Brushing aside Rehberg's BAC, seeing him quoted by the paper repeatedly minimizing Frost's condition screams "no class." Nothing to see here. The injury is "survivable." Worse yet, Iverson's first comments (can't find link now) implied Dustin was going to be fine because he was young. There's spin for you. I'm guessing right now that no one wants Dustin's condition to be fodder for any political attacks on Rehberg. And that's fine. But just say it, man, just say it. We're all worried as hell, but optimistic. (But kudos to Iverson for being upfront and open about Rehberg's condition, his BAC, the background for the incident, etc & co.)

Second, where's Greg Barkus? According to this Flathead Beacon report, his wife said he's in intensive care, as of yesterday. Is he okay? Again, I know I have no right to know - but it seems odd that no one's talking about the injuries sustained. It smells like someone's playing "cleaner" here. Again, these are real people in crisis. Our first reaction should be to express genuine concern. Let us do so. Get better, Greg.

Third, as John Adams noted, the authorities involved are acting odd. While Rehberg's BAC was known pretty quickly, Barkus' - the boat's driver - has been a mystery. Turns out, the authorities don't know it, either, and are just now getting around to subpoenaing the results. The boat wasn't searched until today. Don't count me among the conspiracy theorists, but this is not a smooth investigation. Did they not understand how much scrutiny this case was going to get?

Yesterday's report by John Adams on the incident was the most comprehensive yet, and it appears that slowly information is coming out. And none too soon. We just want to know...

Of all the comments and posts and news articles that have been written about the crash, I like Pete Talbot's the best:

...I'm having a tough time with the moral indignation associated with the accident. Possibly that's because I don't have an unblemished record for doing stupid things. Granted, elected officials should set a better example but they're only human.

Rehberg's stands on health care, war, the poor, the environment, taxes ... I find that much more abhorrent than his lapses in his private life.

And what bothers me even more is hypocrisy - you know, the 'family values' politician who's screwing anything that moves (not referring to Rehberg here).

Finally, as we both know, alcoholism is a disease. If alcohol abuse was one of the root causes of this accident, then maybe someone needs some help.

I hope there's a fair, timely investigation and all the facts come out but I'm certainly not going to cast the first stone, especially while people are recuperating in the hospital.

Well done, sir. And again...get well Dustin and Greg...thoughts and prayers go out to you and your loved ones.

Jay Stevens :: On the Flathead Lake boat crash
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Some more info (0.00 / 0)
Barkus' condition:

Barkus has a broken pelvis and fractured ribs.

Barkus' "Previous Incident":

Barkus pleaded guilty to a 2004 reckless driving charge. Court documents show he was fined $300, with a $35 surcharge and ordered to complete the Assessment, Course and Treatment program. ACT is required for those convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs.
Although Barkus was convicted of reckless driving, he was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. The arrest took place on June 3, 2004, when Montana Highway Patrol Trooper Michael Kent stopped Barkus' Chevrolet Corvette - license plate "DREAMIT" - going 84 mph on Highway 93 along the west shore of Flathead Lake.

Lake County Attorney Mitch Young, was chief deputy county attorney and handled the case. He said Tuesday that Barkus refused a breath test for alcohol and complained that Kent was keeping him from reaching his elderly mother, who he said was in poor health.

"I remember that he was mad about being stopped as he was rushing to his mother's bedside," Young said. "And I remember that he refused" to be tested for his blood-alcohol content. Barkus was cited for speeding in addition to DUI, but Young said his case on the alcohol charge wasn't very strong.

Barkus was represented by Glazier, and Glazier and Young eventually reached an agreement, with Barkus pleading guilty to reckless driving, paying a fine and attending the ACT program in exchange for dismissal of the other two charges.

"This is what happens sometimes in borderline DUI cases," Young said. "You want to make sure they do the class in hopes that they address the underlying issues of drinking and driving." Glazier did not return phone calls Tuesday.



let's wait until the BAC comes out.... (0.00 / 0)
...before we jump to conclusions...

[ Parent ]
What conclusions? (0.00 / 0)
I do nothing but provide quotes and links to the MSM and I get accused of jumping to conclusions?

Sheesh. Talk about touchy. And I thought I was being conservative, because the "moral indignation" quote of Pete's was a sideways dig at my attempts to get people to look through Iverson's deceptive press releases.

Those who want to accuse me of moral indignation and "jumping to conclusions" should know that I have gone through the experience that Dustin Frost's family is going through--sitting indefinitely at the bedside of a family member who has had a traumatic brain injury (through no fault of their own) and is in a coma or is being held in a sedated, unconscious state. I have spent years helping said family member through rehab, and learning to live with the pain of an acquired learning disability, and other losses and deficits. I have spent years fighting insurance companies over health care, the government over lawsuits and liens, decisions about liability lawsuits, on and on...

I have a ton of things to say about the feelings that a family member goes through in that situation, and how feelings can be directed at those who either directly or indirectly may be responsible for the accident and injuries. I know how it feels when a person doesn't own up to their responsibility for an accident.

I bite my tongue (and yes, I have and continue to bite my tongue) exactly because i know that for Frost's family, they have one thing to focus on: helping Dustin pull through his injuries, and get through rehab. They are dealing with an incredible amount of uncertainty, and when I hear someone like Iverson make his jackass statements about Frosts condition, I loose all sympathy for Rehberg or Barkus and their presumed innocence.

Those guys fucked up big time, and continue to abuse their authority and power by allowing disinformation to be propagated in the media, and by withholding information (even if they have the legal right to do so).

I may not be able to conclude that Barkus was drunk. But I could infer that Rehberg was, by the use of retrograde extrapolation. I may not be able to conclude that Barkus was actually driving the boat, but if he was, he is responsible for Frost's and the others' injuries, drunk or not.

I may not be able to conclude that Frost and Smith were actually working for Rehberg the evening of the accident, but when field staff accompany a U.S. Rep on his outings, he has a responsibility to see that their travels are conducted safely. I can't conclude, but I can infer that Rehberg shares responsibility for the injuries to his staff because 1) he most likely was drunk when he made the decision to get in the boat and during the ride, and let his staff get in the boat with Barkus; and 2) his field staff were doing their jobs, whether in an official capacity or not, and had placed their implicit trust in the powerful man they worked for.

And if Iverson wants to press the claim that Rehberg wasn't drunk, and he was not driving the boat, then if it is shown that Barkus was legally drunk, then the question becomes one of then why in the hell wasn't Rehberg driving the boat--being the designated driver? Iverson has painted Denny into a corner, no matter which way it turns out. Damned if Barkus was drunk, damned if he wasn't.

Denny needs to man-up and take some responsibility. And the people of this state need to hold him accountable--which is what I am trying to stimulate: some accountability for our U.S. Representative.


[ Parent ]
sorry, JC... (0.00 / 0)
...I just think we need to wait on Frost before we go after these people. Barkus was hurt pretty badly, too. Once the smoke clears, I'll be ready and willing to make hay of it all.

All of what you say is true, tho. I'm just not ready to start flinging accusations...yet.


[ Parent ]
JC, I too have had (0.00 / 0)
a family member injured by a driver.  My daughter is still recovering from her brain injury now over a year after the incident.  Not once has the driver owned up or even said, "Sorry!"

Now why would that be????  Check your auto policy instructions as to what to do in case of an accident.  Failure to follow those instructions may compromise their duty to defend and pay.  I am assuming Barkus had a liability policy for his boat.  Waiting for a subpoena to  compel evidence is a lot cleaner for coverage purposes. IF Barkus has a broken pelvis, as I have read, that is extremely serious and very painful.  Lots of drugs for this.  A friend of mine broke his when the calf he roped broke under neath his horse and the horse bucked straight up.  He landed on the horn. Damn near bled to death internally.  

It would be improper to elicit a statement from someone under those conditions.

Over a year now and no apology.  IT SUCKS!!!!!


[ Parent ]
i remember that craig (0.00 / 0)
and i only hope your daughter is ok. you were pretty shook up. i know that jc has been through some very traumatic times with his daughter as well. i guess all we can do at this point is pray for mr. frost and hope for the best. meanwhile, i don't condemn anyone for feeling the way they do about this. i just had to step off out of my own sense of conscience and back away from it. too many times that i have done some pretty dicey stuff - unlike barkus i got away with it but still- pretty dicey....

[ Parent ]
Pbear (0.00 / 0)
Thank You!!!!!!!!!


[ Parent ]
Craig (0.00 / 0)
It is not without sympathy that I have to point out the obvious:

There is a gigantic and obvious difference between between the travails of your daughter and those of a public official.  You rightly (and justly) blur the line of human ability to respond under legal onus.  But it is incorrect to drive sympathy to State Senator Barkus when the public has every legal right to know how he treated with the assets that we possess.  This isn't about whether or not he personally owes an apology or a statement.  It's about whether the public is owed an explanation for a serious accident which injured our Congressman.  Barkus doesn't need to say anything for the facts concerning that to come out.

All due sympathy to your family or Mr. Frost or Barkus himself aside, that has nothing to do with the injury to your daughter.  It has to do with the public's right to know.


[ Parent ]
Wulfgar, you are right (0.00 / 0)
and thank for your thoughts.

I reread my comment and I see where you were coming from.  It was not my intention to drive sympathy but to indicate what may be behind the slow drip of facts and the need for the subpoena.  Let justice be done.

I hope and pray everyone heals and fully recovers.  


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox