Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

The Chronicle Tells Rep. Rehberg He Missed the Mark on Sign Debate

by: MTboots

Tue Oct 06, 2009 at 15:44:22 PM MST


(Wow! The Bozeman Chronicle pretty much nails my thoughts on Rehberg's manufactured rage over the public highway signs...and, by the way, if the jobless rate keeps rising, it's likely we will be using those signs again... - promoted by Jay Stevens)

Rehberg misses mark on stimulus sign debate
The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

Editorial

Published 10/1/2009

    Montana Congressman Denny Rehberg's disapproval of expensive highway signs identifying projects paid for with economic stimulus money is understandable. After all, the signs could be viewed as just so much chest-beating on the part of partisan government officials.

  But it looks like Rehberg may have taken aim at the wrong target.

  The distinctive-looking, multicolored signs are posted along highways where federal economic stimulus money is being used to complete highway work. The text is simple: "Recovery Reinvestment," an abbreviation of the full name of the bill that authorized a more than $700-billiondollar economic stimulus package passed by Congress earlier this year.

  Rehberg's took his ire over the signs so far as to complain in writing to no less than Vice President Joe Biden and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. But a spokesman for the Federal Highway Administration said that, while the agency approved the design of the sign, states make the decision on where or even if to use them and that the states are not required to use the signs at all.

  Jim Lynch, the director of the Montana Department of Transportation and apparently the person Rehberg should have been scolding, said the Recovery Reinvestment signs are no different than the orange signs that routinely mark taxpayer-funded highway projects and are just a form of transparency that allows citizens to see where their tax dollars are going.

  A Rehberg spokesman countered that Recovery Reinvestment signs are a one-shot deal, while the orange signs can be recycled with new dollar figures on them. And Rehberg argued on the floor of the House last week that, "[t]hese signs provide no jobs or long-term investment in our economy." Tell that to company that   makes the Reinvestment Recovery signs - and its employees.

  There's plenty of room for debate over the wisdom of some of Congress' and the administration's efforts to get the economy back on its feet by spending big federal bucks. But the sign brouhaha seems like little more than a distraction from the issues that Congress should be debating.

MTboots :: The Chronicle Tells Rep. Rehberg He Missed the Mark on Sign Debate
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Mission 66 (0.00 / 0)
The other day, as I was watching the Ken Burns National Parks series, I couldn't help but notice old video footage showing National Park visitors being greeted with a sign that said something along the lines of "Mission 66: Improving Your National Parks."

You can learn more about Mission 66 here: http://www.mission66.com/missi...

But basically, according to the site, "Mission 66 was a federally-sponsored program to improve deteriorated and dangerous conditions in the national parks, the result of a massive visitor boom after World War II.  Mission 66 projects began in 1956 and ended in 1966. During those ten years, more than $1 billion was spent on infrastructure and other improvements in the parks."

I suppose Rehberg wouldn't have liked these signs either.



I saw the Mission 66 program! Very cool (0.00 / 0)
And thanks for this post. I so rarely read the Chronicle and would have missed this.

[ Parent ]
I'm thinkin' maybe some signs up along Flathead Lake. (3.00 / 1)
CAUTION: SLOW REPUBBIES AT PLAY!

DRUNKEN PUBBIE CROSSING!

DON'T DRINK AND DRIVE A BOAT, BUT IF YOU DO, MAKE SURE YOU HAVE DESIGNATED DENNY WITH YOU!

BARKUS BOAT RAMP. FOR NIGHT USE ONLY!

Think if we painted'em orange, Dopey Reeburp would like'em?



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox