Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Some Budgetary Perspective

by: Matt Singer

Fri Oct 23, 2009 at 12:55:25 PM MST


So there's been a lot of hand wringing about a health care reform bill that will cost approximately $800-900 billion over ten years. To put that into perspective, let's look at defense spending in the U.S. this year:
The Senate on Thursday sent the massive 2010 Pentagon policy bill to the president's desk for signing. The Senate approved the bill authorizing $680 billion in defense spending by a vote of 68-29.
Combine this with a handful of other security related appropriations and we spend every year roughly what is under consideration for the ten year cost of health reform.

Cato's Chris Preble writes:

All told, every man, woman and child in the United States will spend more than $2,700 on these programs and agencies next year. By way of comparison, the average Japanese spends less than $330; the average German about $520; China's per capita spending is less than $100.
Keeping in mind that Social Security and Medicare are funded by earmarked payroll taxes that are used to underwrite the general budget of the U.S., it is worth remembering that Defense is by far the biggest portion of the federal budget.

Some of that is reasonable. Unlike Chris Preble, I'm not an avowed opponent of U.S. military domination. I think the U.S. is a relatively enlightened hegemon and I think unipolar worlds offer some useful stability.

But the Defense budget in the U.S. is wildly out of control in ways that do nothing to advance American interests. That means that we're spending a lot of money we don't have to.

Fighting to focus the defense budget on...defense instead of on it being a massive jobs program for private military contractors is one of the most underrated social justice issues of our time. Tackled properly, it could be a real game changer in positive ways for the nation.

Matt Singer :: Some Budgetary Perspective
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Wow Jed... (0.00 / 0)
that's like a "three fer"....health insurance...killing and maiming, AND oil!!  So if we divide the defense budget by three it's really only like $200 billion a year...

Are you actually advocating for a game changing reduction of the defense bill? (0.00 / 0)
Are you actually advocating cutting out private defense contractors, in a meaningful way?  And their contributions to the Democratic Party?

Or are you just messing around?


Just to frustrate you, Steve (0.00 / 0)
I'll say that depends.

We're not going to cut out defense contractors completely (to be fair, I don't think that's what you're asking). The manufacturing of military equipment is likely to be left in the hands of contractors. I am talking about eliminating unnecessary programs. I'd like to also see a lot of the outsourcing of relatively core military functions -- base supply, transportation, etc. -- returned to the military.

I don't really have a full platform here. But I do think the DoD budget should be looked at closely and that the priority should be on national security. As I said in this post, I'm not opposed to U.S. hegemony. But I still think our defense budget could probably be cut by about a quarter in smart ways that wouldn't undermine our interests at all.


[ Parent ]
So what are you going to do (0.00 / 0)
when U.S. hegemony is challenged by the largest holder of U.S. debt? The largest assembler of American googaws? The largest benefactor of U.S. trade deficit?

Prepared to go to war with China in 10 years to maintain that hegemony?

I've heard of how the notion of American exceptionalism is used to justify top dog status. But you know? I just don't think America is all that exceptional these days. Maintaining U.S. hegemony is a sure way to rot the country from the inside out. And the crony capitalists are more than happy to see that happen, as it solidifies their hold on the U.S. politi-economic state.

Ike warned of the "military-industrial" complex over 60 years ago. And that complex's number one goal is to maintain U.S. hegemony.

If you're not opposed to U'S. hegemony, you'll never see real DoD cuts. You'll just see some tokenism, like Obama did with the F-22.

Now if we hear talk of the neolibs wanting to cut $100 or 150 billion/year out of defense, then maybe we are seeing some transformative politics.

You willing to pay for true, 100% universal health care coverage with real cuts in defense spending Matt? Or do you prefer U.S. hegemony? Because that's really the sort of choices that are before us.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox