| User Blox 4 |
|
- Put stuff here
|
Barack Obama  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.
|
|
Mon Oct 26, 2009 at 10:15:05 AM MST
|
| I'm about to head over to watch some of this forest bill open house. It may be a good opportunity to learn some more about the bill -- good and bad.
But before I do that, I wanted to flag another issue in the U.S. Senate that is just unbelievable and a reminder that this country currently has one serious political party and one insane group of nutjobs with no plans to actually govern.
The NYT editorializes: With the start of the 2010 census just a few months away, Senator David Vitter, a Republican of Louisiana, wants to cut off financing for the count unless the survey includes a question asking if the respondent is a United States citizen. Aides say he plans to submit an amendment to the census appropriation bill soon.
As required by law, the Census Bureau gave Congress the exact wording of the survey's 10 questions in early April 2008 - more than 18 months ago. Changing it now to meet Mr. Vitter's demand would delay the count, could skew the results and would certainly make it even harder to persuade minorities to participate.
It would also be hugely expensive. The Commerce Department says that redoing the survey would cost hundreds of millions of dollars: to rewrite and reprint hundreds of millions of census forms, to revise instructional and promotional material and to reprogram software and scanners. If we're going to waste money like this, couldn't we ask some other questions as well, like "Have you ever worn a diaper and hired a prostitute while serving in federal elected office?"
But this isn't just about cost. It is about the Constitution. The Constitution calls for a count of "the whole numbers of persons in each state," not for the number of citizens. The census bureau tries to separately keep tabs on such numbers as do other federal agencies, but for the purpose of apportionment, citizenship is a Constitutional non-issue.
So should we waste money to violate the Constitution? I'd say no. David Vitter and a lot of Republicans are saying yes. I think the favorable reading here is that they're idiots. |
| Matt Singer :: Republicans Try to Destroy the Census |
|
|
| Poll |
| Voting. Useful or not? |
|
|
|
Results
|
|