Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Open Letter

by: Livingston, I Presume

Fri Oct 30, 2009 at 15:01:12 PM MDT


( - promoted by Jay Stevens)

(Cross-posted at my blog.)

Dear Republican senators Charles E. Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Richard Shelby and your 52 other colleagues in the Senate and House of Representatives who steadfastly and on principal oppose a public option, despite being on Medicare:

Must be nice.

Not only do you have access to what has to be considered the Rolls Royce of Cadillac health plans, you are also eligible for and take advantage of America's original public option, Medicare. In fact, according to New York Representative Anthony Weiner, a total of 150 of you lawmakers in Washington "currently receive government-funded, government-administered single-payer health care", also known as Medicare.

But you know what? I don't have a beef with the other 95 of your colleagues. It's you 55 I'm interested in.

Livingston, I Presume :: Open Letter
That's because you're doing your level best to deny me access to anything resembling the health care that you enjoy on my dime. I'm not asking for your Rolls Royce plan--although it must be suh-weet!, especially when it's coupled with the Office of the Attending Physician, which provides you with round-the-clock access to America's best healthcare for just $503 per year. (No, really! "Members of Congress do not pay for the individual services they receive at the OAP, nor do they submit claims through their federal employee health insurance policies. Instead, members pay a flat, annual fee of $503 for all the care they receive. The rest of the cost of their care, sources said, is subsidized by taxpayers," ABC News helpfully explains.)

Wow, $503. That would get me a ton of healthcare out here on the open market using the wisdom of the invisible hand. That would be, um, five routine visits to the doctor! Or five months' worth of one of the three prescriptions Connery needs to keep his asthma at bay! Or three-quarters of the $750 a month that his asthma specialist's first-choice medicine would have cost us if we could have afforded it. Or two visits to that specialist! Gee, for $503, I could just about not cover my family at all. I guess I could use that $503 to pay for COBRA coverage to continue the crappy-ass High Deductible HSA that Chip and I are grateful to have. Or to pay off Connery's hospital stay from February 2008 that we're still making payments on. The mind boggles!

But I digress. What I was going to say was that I understand that giving everybody your Rolls Royce insurance would probably bankrupt the country, so I'm not asking for that, as lovely as it would be. No, all I would like is to be able to buy in to the public option that you're exercising--you know, to get Medicare, even though I'm only 36 years old. It's not perfect, but don't think I didn't notice that the only people not paying $24.99 at Livingston's Most Contentious Flu Shot Clinic (another story entirely) were the senior citizens covered by Medicare.

If not, I understand. I mean, you're busy people, what with all the glad-handing and fundraising and back-slapping and progress-blocking and such. But I would ask that you consider giving up your public option--it is, after all, only ideologically consistent. And, since taxpayers are paying for 75 percent of that Rolls Royce plan, you should probably give that up as well. Same with your access to the Magical $503-Per-Year Clinic, for which we taxpayers are also footing the bill--or which could be running up that awful deficit that was not a concern on November 3, 2008 but became a TOTAL CRISIS!!! on November 4, 2008.

Stripped of those perks, you could join the rest of us in the open market and try your hand at some non-group private coverage. I wonder how many of you would actually be eligible? Hard to believe that there aren't a few of you living with diabetes or heart disease or cancer or some other chronic illness that renders normal mortals uninsurable--or that none of you has a BMI over 30 or high blood pressure or, you know, a vagina (I'm looking at you, Rep. Judy Biggert, Rep. Sue Myrick, Rep. Kay Granger, Rep. Virginia Foxx, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite!). After all, there are 133 million Americans living with such "pre-existing conditions" and many more if you count those of us who have vaginas. Have fun trying to convince someone to insure you. We all do!

Ideological purity seems to be a "thing" with many of you. I would urge you to stand firm with yourself and remedy this glaring oversight. To help you along, I've included all your names below, just as a reminder to you and your constituents. I'm sure the people that you represent would be happy to help you remember.

Yours sincerely,

Nicole

The Hall of Shame: Congress members who oppose the public option but take Medicare
Rep. Ralph M. Hall
Rep. Roscoe G. Bartlett    
Rep. Sam Johnson    
Rep. C.W. Bill Young    
Rep. Howard Coble    
Sen. Jim Bunning    
Sen. Richard G. Lugar    
Rep. Don Young    
Sen. Charles E. Grassley    
Sen. Robert F. Bennett    
Rep. Vernon J. Ehlers    
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch    
Sen. Richard C. Shelby    
Rep. Jerry Lewis    
Sen. James M. Inhofe    
Rep. Ron Paul    
Rep. Henry E. Brown    
Sen. Pat Roberts    
Sen. George V. Voinovich    
Sen. John McCain    
Rep. Judy Biggert    
Sen. Thad Cochran    
Rep. Harold Rogers    
Rep. Dan Burton    
Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon
Rep. Frank R. Wolf    
Rep. Michael N. Castle    
Rep. Joe Pitts    
Rep. Tom Petri    
Sen. Lamar Alexander    
Rep. Doc Hastings    
Rep. Cliff Stearns    
Rep. Sue Myrick    
Rep. John Carter    
Sen. Mitch McConnell    
Sen. Jon Kyl    
Rep. Phil Gingrey    
Rep. Nathan Deal    
Rep. John Linder    
Rep. Kay Granger    
Rep. John L. Mica    
Rep. Walter B. Jones    
Sen. Jim Risch    
Rep. Ed Whitfield    
Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner    
Rep. Virginia Foxx    
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison    
Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite    
Sen. Saxby Chambliss    
Sen. Michael B. Enzi    
Rep. Elton Gallegly    
Rep. Donald Manzullo    
Rep. Peter T. King    
Rep. Ander Crenshaw

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Open Letter | 2 comments
Since it was the Democrats who crippled the public option, I think you might want to re-direct your anger. (0.00 / 0)
OK i admit. they put a public option in name only into their bills. A crippled shrunk-down ineffective public pool by any other name smells just as foul.

But really, the Repos had nothing at all whatsoever to do with what's in those bills.

The reason they are crappy is entirely because of the Democrats. The Dems made the public option a big joke, a big inside joke.

Or are you mad because the Repos won't vote for the crappy public option the Dems can pass with or without the Repos?

Why are you mad at the Repos anyway? They can't stop passage of the crappy public option.

I think you might be suffering from projection. You are pissed and you just can't bring your self to blame the culprits, so you instead blame the people who have zero power. I understand. I'm pissed too.


Sen. Baucus must also be on Medicare--he's a ripe old 67, soon to be 68 years old in December (0.00 / 0)
Good 'ol Max must also be enjoying the benefits of Medicare, as he is currently 67 years old, and will have a birthday in December.  He is as guilty as any Republican of sabotaging the possibility of a REAL public option.

Open Letter | 2 comments
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox