Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Right-wing group claims to represent "sunshine," just don't shine the light on them

by: Montana Cowgirl

Thu Nov 19, 2009 at 20:47:40 PM MST


When Howie Rich, the New York City billionaire, helped bankroll the trio of fraudulent ballot initiatives in 2006, the uprising of anti-government arch-conservatives helped block democrats from gaining more ground in the Montana legislature with a groundswell of tea-bagger types-- even though the initiatives were declared invalid in the closing months of the race.

Enter in 2009 the Montana Policy Institute: a group that keeps its backer veiled in secrecy.  Organized as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, the group is a thinly regulated entity that can engage in limited amounts of public organizing, but cannot advocate for or against candidates and is supposed to remain non-partisan.

It guards its secrecy as closely as possible and the group refuses to identify any of its donors or its out-of-state bankroller.  The group refuses to say, in fact, much about itself at all. Its website says it is a

"free market think tank focused on Montana issues and Montana solutions"
(it just refuses to prove it is funded by actual Montanans) and wants to
"make state and local government more transparent."

As long as you don't try to shine a light on their own financial backers: the group flatly refuses to disclose them. There's something highly suspect about a group that refuses to hold themselves to the very standards of openness, sunshine, and transparency they claim to champion.

Montana Cowgirl :: Right-wing group claims to represent "sunshine," just don't shine the light on them
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
MPI has arrived! (0.00 / 0)
How nice of Montana Cowgirl to provide MPI (www.mtpolicy.org) an excuse to enter the Left's premier echo chamber - and I mean that in a complimentary way to LITHW.  That fact that we're being attacked tells me we're making a difference.  It's a good day!

I'm afraid the arguments on donor lists and transparency don't ring particularly true in this post, though.  Let me illustrate why by quoting John Podesta's Center for American Progress:

"Some donors choose to make public what they are giving us, but others don't, and we respect that," said Jennifer M. Palmieri, the center's senior vice president for communications. (NY Times, 11/7/2008)

It's a matter of respecting donors' wishes.
Want to know why?  Well, ask Tom Matzie, formerly of MoveOn.org who started the group Accountable America.  One of his goals is to

confront donors to conservative groups, hoping to create a chilling effect that will dry up contributions.

according to an article in the NY Times (8/08/2008.  Google it.  I can't figure out how to put a hyperlink in this thing and can't afford a webmaster to bring me into the 21st century)

How does that work?  Well, ask Scott Eckern, former director of the nonprofit California Musical Theater in Sacramento.  He was forced to resign after the theater was deluged with criticism following the revelation that he had given $1,000 to "Yes on 8," the gay marriage ban initiative.  There are plenty more examples of harrassment, boycotts, and worse that came out of people exercising their free speech rights and being punished for it.

The fact is, if anyone had bothered to ask, that there is no big money donor behind MPI.  We have literally hundreds (ok, around a couple hundred) individual Montana donors.  Yes, we accept donations - some of them significant to our relatively small overall budget - from like-minded foundations, as do virtually all nonprofits.  We accept no government money, though, unlike many nonprofits on the Left side of issues.  Think Acorn and any number of environmental groups.

Which brings us to government transparency.  We are accountable to our donors and only our donors for what we do.  The government is likewise accountable to taxpayers for what they do.  The difference is that our donors give to us voluntarily.  Our tax dollars are taken under threat of force.  We're not against taxes, but we think we have a right to know how they're being spent since it's our money and we have no choice in forking it over.  It's not really that complicated an argument.

So thanks again for the free plug Montana Cowgirl, but I think you've put up kind of a canard in your effort to make us look bad.  And by the way, if you really do have concerns about how we operate, feel free to give me a call.  The number's on our web site (www.mtpolicy.org).

Carl Graham
President, MPI


And if CowGirl had a bit more intellectual honesty... (0.00 / 0)
She would also disclose that the founder of this blog has received "out of state" money for his Forward Montana project who also would not disclose his donor rolls.

Feh!


Geez, Dave, you should work for FOX "news" (0.00 / 0)
1)  Discussion of a subject does not now, nor ever has, demanded "intellectual honesty" through discussion of another.  Such illusion is the bread and butter of FAUX news.  Such demand is Big Swede's favorite tactic of diversion.  I'm surprised that you would fall for such twaddle, Dave.

2)  Forward Montana is not MPI.  MPI seeks to disclose funding sources for others while masking there own.  That is not now, nor ever has been, the purpose, goal or mission statement of Forward Montana.  Comparing Apples to Oranges, Dave?  How intellectually sloppy of you.

3)  In comment to this very post, Carl Graham admits to political bias, while weeping about the "harassment" that follows his group's goals (but only on the left side, of course.)  Shouldn't your own commitment to "intellectual honesty" have caught that fact, Dave?

Personally, I'd love to watch you on "FOX and Friends", Dave.  You'd be a vast improvement over the vapid know-nothings they currently have.

And in the interest of full disclosure, I don't agree with Montana Cowgirl on this point.  Even as loathsome as they can often be, I don't think that 501's should be coerced or cajoled into releasing donor lists.  That doesn't mean I won't note hypocrisy when I see it.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox