Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Health reform: Chamber's tactics work against Montana small business

by: John_Firehammer

Fri Nov 20, 2009 at 16:16:11 PM MST


( - promoted by Jay Stevens)

Is the Montana Chamber of Commerce really working on behalf of Montana businesses, or is it just a mouthpiece for it's national masters? Reading Mike Dennison's story in the Lee Newspapers today, you have to wonder.

According to the article, the Montana Chamber and the state chapter of the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) have sent out messages to their members saying that reform proposals will raise taxes on small business and do nothing to address out-of-control medical costs.

But the opposite is true. Both the recently passed House bill and proposed legislation in the Senate would provide tax credits to businesses that provide coverage to their employees. And a health insurance exchange created by the proposals would make that coverage more affordable to small businesses. Right now, employee health insurance is flat out of reach to many businesses that would like to offer it.

In echoing the anti-reform sentiments of its national parent, the Montana Chamber appears to be placing the interest of large corporations elsewhere ahead of what's in the best interest of small businesses in Montana.

Pretty shameless, but at least people are noticing. Earlier this week the Washington Post exposed the Chamber's plan to solicit a slanted study on health care reform legislation. And today American Rights at Work launched a "Not My Chamber" Twitter protest against the group, decrying the its opposition to health care reform. Around the country, some state Chamber chapters are voicing their objections to the national organization's tactics.

The truth is, providing employees with health insurance is good for small business. It helps employers attract and retain good employees. Many Montana small businesses recognize this and are struggling to keep up with rising premiums unchecked by competition. Other small businesses would like to provide coverage, but can't afford to do so. Reform efforts will help, not hurt, these people.

John Firehammer
Montana Communications Director
Change That Works

John_Firehammer :: Health reform: Chamber's tactics work against Montana small business
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
While I agree with you that the interests of big business and small business are often (0.00 / 0)
diametrically opposed, I disagree with you that a job based health care system is good for anyone except perhaps big unions like SEIU who have already invested considerable time and energy into negotiating health care benefits, and big employers who currently get big tax breaks.

Ideally, we would divorce health care from the work place completely and totally.

Don't you agree? Or are you in favor of forever keeping health care chained to the work place?


??? (0.00 / 0)
I disagree with you that a job based health care system is good for anyone except perhaps big unions like SEIU who have already invested considerable time and energy into negotiating health care benefits, and big employers who currently get big tax breaks.

As written, this comment amounts to 'you say, I say you're wrong, let's look at something off topic instead'.  I, for one, would appreciate it if you could be more specific about why the current proposal is bad for small business without touting your pet desires (changing the subject).


[ Parent ]
Steve possesses more than peripheral knowledge on the subject ... (0.00 / 0)
In addition to "keeping health care chained to the workplace" he might have added "keeping workers chained to their jobs". It's quite germane.

[ Parent ]
Yes, he seems to, sort of ... (0.00 / 0)
Steve possesses more than peripheral knowledge on the subject

So what?  He has more than peripheral knowledge of what he wants, but apparently not the subject of the post.  I'm sorry that I have to point out once again that you and Steve are arguing about what isn't going to happen.  It is not germane to anything, certainly not the subject of the COC harming small business through their right-wing desires.

Mark, if you're going to answer for the man, you might want to at least address the question asked.  Oh right, you won't.  You're delusional.  And I do notice that Steve still hasn't bothered to respond to the salient point ...


[ Parent ]
So what else is new? (0.00 / 0)
The Chamber has almost always been on the wrong side of the issues that small business face...for example...minimum wage...most small business recognize that to attract and keep good employees they have to pay more than a minimum wage, yet the Chamber spends their money...and lots of it...every year trying to kill any increase in a minimum wage...that is money that could be better spent lobbying the legislature on issues that would level the playing field for Montana business with multinational chains...

Big Sage just scratched the surface (0.00 / 0)
The Chamber has opposed so much worthwhile legislation, it's hard to keep track.  It's against cap-and-trade (sure, carbon taxation is a more desirable approach but this is better than nothing).  It supports pro-pollution bills (including watering down Missoula's air opacity standards and ignoring cyanide heap-leach mining).  The candidates it has supported in Missoula races are the anti-planning, dumb growth, big box store variety.

Add health care and minimum wage to the list, and one can see that the Chamber speaks for big corporate interests, not small, independent business owners.    


Wulfgar/Mark T. (0.00 / 0)
I'm so bored of your little pissing match I'm ready to quit reading this blog altogether.  You're both smart guys, so why are you wasting your and our time sniping at each other.

Steve W. has a valid point, vis-a-vis this post: health care shouldn't be tied to employment.

Here are the facts as I see them. The Chamber is almost always wrong when it comes to the interests of Main Street Montana. The current Senate bill is lame, and with input from Lieberman and the Blue Dogs, will probably become lamer. I'm way tired of the Matt Singer, SEIU, Ezra Klein apologists. There's a possibility that a House/Senate reconciliation bill might be marginally better -- but still hardly what one would call real reform -- Congress was bought and sold before real reform got off the ground.    

It's depressing but you two guys aren't helping.  Please direct your ire at the poltroons keeping us from any meaningful progressive change on so many issues.


Pete, you miss the obvious (0.00 / 0)
Please direct your ire at the poltroons keeping us from any meaningful progressive change on so many issues.

Mark actually believes he is, and that is exactly why he goes after me.  In his head, an IT manager in Montana is the real enemy.  So please don't be chiding me that I respond negatively to Mark's delusions.

And quite frankly, Pete, I don't care if you're "bored" with it.  I started after Mark well after he was already driving people away from this website with constant lame attacks against it's writers.  I've done the same for 4&20 and ECW before.  See, I value the medium.  Disagreement is one thing, trolling is another.  And just to put a finer point on it, if you quit reading here, Mark get's exactly what he wants.  Kindly maintain interest long enough to show me how that's anything but trolling a website.


[ Parent ]
And just for the record (0.00 / 0)
Repeating myself yet again, no, health insurance/coverage/care shouldn't be tied to employment in a better program of reform.  That isn't what we're dealing with here, is it?  

[ Parent ]
Point taken ... (0.00 / 0)
I understand if it gets a little tiresome. Nobody likes to hear that they are the problem, that they steal the baton and lead the marching band down the dead alley, as in Animal House. But it seems that Democrats enjoy being Democrats so much that if you don't remind them every now and then, they think they make a difference.

Remember that this is just blogging. We are a small community, and we don't matter. What we do here pretty much stays here.

Blogging is, in my mind, merely a pastime. I have met some sharp people and enjoy trading barbs with them. I have learned a great deal. It is through blogging that I got into Democratic circles and came to realize how vacuous it is.

Mathew Koehler is bringing us some information from a professor at U of M whom I respect very much. That's a worthy activity for a blog, and I like it. That seems useful. But Democratic hacks pumping in smoke about a bad bill they are trying to foist on us ... no so much.

But as Nader reminded me, the Internet is not an organizing tool. It's merely an information source. And bad information needs to be countered by good.

Wulfgar - you reap what you sow. Do not ever, ever criticize others on the blogs. Your presence is felt by all. You've used the f-bomb on all of us, lectured us ad nauseum on that logic pamphlet you read. You get off me, I'll get off your mother.  


[ Parent ]
I've told you before, Mark (0.00 / 0)
Don't tell me what to do.  I don't take instruction from the delusional.

[ Parent ]
Now go back too your 'clever negotiating' phase (0.00 / 0)
And tell me who had a better grip on reality.  

[ Parent ]
I should stay off the sauce when I'm blogging (0.00 / 0)
Although some of my best stuff has been done after a snort or two.  Also, some of my worst stuff.

That being said, I'll bet that Wulfgar and Mark T. are actually closer in political philosophy than their comments would indicate.  It's also not my role to tell them what, when or how to comment.  I'll, of course, continue to visit this site.

And apologies to Matt, my friends at SEIU -- even Ezra Klein -- I just wish y'all shared my passion for universal health care.

Happy Thanksgiving one and all.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox