Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Game, Set and Match

by: Montana Cowgirl

Thu Jan 14, 2010 at 16:46:27 PM MST


A bad week for Republicans.  First, despite the  insistence by Republicans that Brian Schweitzer doesnt know what he is doing, the Wall Street Journal wrote an editorial  praising the Governor's solid fiscal management as a national example of how states can operate frugally while still fulfilling important obligations.  No response yet from Republican leader Bob Story, who recently argued that Judy Martz is responsible for Montana's current fiscal strength.  

Then, a new chapter in Tennisgate.  You'll recall Republican Bozeman Mayor Jeff Krauss got into trouble recently when he chose to spend stimulus money on a new rubber-tiled tennis court.  Schweitzer publicly chided this expenditure, and the Mayor ended up having to defend himself on Fox 'News'.  This past Monday the volume was amplified when Schweitzer decided to attend, as a citizen, the weekly City Commission meeting in Bozeman.

According to several observers, Schweitzer was first accosted outside of the meeting room by Commissioner Chris Mehl, who cursed at him, saying:

"what you are doing is bullsh**, Governor."
 

(Mehl obviously takes his tennis very seriously).  

When the meeting came to order, Schweitzer waited in the back of the room as six or seven proponents of the tennis court project gave their testimony.   Then it was Schweitzer's turn to speak.  The only opponent present, Schweitzer said that he, as a property owner in Bozeman and a tennis player, supported fixing the courts, but believed such a project was inappropriate use of federal stimulus funds. The house was packed mostly with Krauss partisans, and there was some hooting and hollering as Krauss and Mehl tried to razz the Governor, questioning him from their perches.   Whatever you think of Schweitzer, this much can be said:  not many gunfighters would walk into a saloon like this one.  

Krauss and Mehl, in what a number of people saw as disrespectful behavior toward a Governor, started interrupting Schweitzer and attempting to pepper him him with spicy one-liners.  But Schweitzer, who did not interrupt the commissioners, hushed the crowd when he said:

"Just because somebody puts a chocolate cake in front of you, doesn't mean you have to eat the whole thing,"
in response to Krauss' argument that Bozeman has the legal right to spend the funds on tennis courts.

Personally I think Krauss has picked a stupid fight.  The Governor's position on this issue is very popular, even in Bozeman where the Chronicle online poll of over 900 respondents shows a 74-26% vote against the tennis project.  Plus, it turns out that the tennis court contract was awarded to a Minnesota firm, meaning no Montana jobs would be created.  

Finally, if Krauss has aspirations beyond city council, he is going to have a tough time. As of now, the notable items on his resume are 1) spending stimulus money on tennis,  and 2) a city policy that required all job applicants to hand over their passwords to their e-mail and facebook accounts.  

That resume won't get you very far in a Republican primary.  

Montana Cowgirl :: Game, Set and Match
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
bozeman mtg (0.00 / 0)
wow. very accurate depiction of the event. as an attendee, i'll say that the  shabby treatment of the governor by those two guys raised eyebrows even among some of the pro-tennis court crowd.

??? (4.00 / 1)
I don't know when exactly Jeff pissed in your Wheaties, but there are some things that need to be straightened out:

1)

Personally I think Krauss has picked a stupid fight.

Krauss didn't pick this fight.  The Governor did.

2)  

The Governor's position on this issue is very popular, even in Bozeman where the Chronicle online poll of over 900 respondents shows a 74-26% vote against the tennis project.

That's some of the most egregious bullshit I think I've ever read.  Since when does an online poll equate to true popularity?  The polls in the Comical are almost always flooded by teabaggers.  And you equate 900 as valid when the population of Bozeman is conservatively 28,000, with the readership of the Comical going well beyond that sphere of influence.  There is precisely no statistical validity to your claim.

3)  One wonders how a meeting can be "packed" with partisans if you still maintain that this is an unpopular project?  That doesn't make much sense.

4)  

in what a number of people saw as disrespectful behavior toward a Governor,

And what number would that be?  2?  5?  You? You've already indicated that the majority of the people in attendance were "Krauss partisans", so kindly tell us all how many think the Governor was so egregiously abused.  In case you didn't bother to watch it, Krauss got an ovation.  Was that "disrespect" for the Governor because of simple disagreement?

5)  

it turns out that the tennis court contract was awarded to a Minnesota firm, meaning no Montana jobs would be created.  

You didn't bother to actually read anything of Jeff's argument, did you?  Jobs in Bozeman boil down to attracting quality of living, not labor of resurfacing tennis courts.  But high quality standards of Parks and Recreation does attract long term jobs and the companies that provide such.  Bozeman has long known that we have little to offer except an outstanding pool of highly educated employees and a great quality of life.  Paying some dude to push hot rubber around with a squeegee for a month isn't really the point, now is it?

6)  

2) a city policy that required all job applicants to hand over their passwords to their e-mail and facebook accounts.  

Look.  I tried to be polite about this, but you are now engaging in nothing more than libel.  That policy is not, nor ever has been, a blight on Krauss's resume.  He is not now, nor ever was, nor ever will be responsible for that sad incident of hiring practice.  You go way too far when you claim such.  You're full of shit on this, so drop it, right now, before you stupidly damage the very website that gives you voice.

7)

when Schweitzer decided to attend, as a citizen,

Quick question:  How many "citizens" flew in on a taxpayer supplied airplane to attend this meeting?  You want to piss and moan about government spending, then wail about that.  You paid for it.  Schweitzer owns property here, but he doesn't live here, and never has.  Consider that before you try and tell me that he's the symbol of Bozeman's common man.

8)  

The only opponent present

No, he wasn't.  That's just a total fricking lie.

9)  

Finally, if Krauss has aspirations beyond city council, he is going to have a tough time.

Now that's just concern trolling, isn't it?

Montana Cowgirl, you obviously don't understand Bozeman.  You obviously don't understand how we do things here, or what we need.  I honestly don't know why this has become such an issue that you are willing to lie about it.  I truly don't understand why Jeff Krauss has become such a thorn in your left cheek.  But you really ought to just back off until you do learn these things, and understand what we do here and how we do it.


You have got to be kidding. (0.00 / 0)
He flew in there on a Montana taxpayer paid-for airplane, presents it as he is there speaking as a resident of Bozeman, and then complains about them doing something 15 other cities and towns and counties across the state are doing?  Something he - ultimately - authorized?  Twice?

I'm pretty sure it isn't cheap to fly a plane around.  Maintenance, fuel, pilot - good God, whadda think that cost?

tsk tsk tsk.

One of the Bozeman newsies tweeted today that CNN was there or coming there to do a story on it, with Krauss.  

Oh - just another bit of information that I found out over at the Flathead Beacon - It didn't start with Fox News doing the story and then Krauss hearing about it and reacting - it started with Drudge Report. The Governor then reacted - which Fox picked up - and the rest is history.

As Kelly Brown suggests in his piece - is it mere coincidence that Schweitzer reacted to a Drudge story, then Fox News picks it up?  

Even more coincidentally - today Brian was invited to join with Newt Gingrich on some economic something or other.

I don't think any of us doubt the guy has ambitions - but if you ask me, he's sacrificing Bozeman at least a little - without acknowledging his role in the whole deal - just to get some airtime with the guys who like tea.

One more - Montana Cowgirl - KECI here in Missoula showed a good 2 or 3 minute clip of at least some of the exchange between the Governor and Krauss, and I didn't see disrespect or interruption.  I saw disagreement, and I saw the Governor saying "yep" and "yes" to a lot of questions Krauss put at him.


Wonder when the Gov's flying to Missoula? (0.00 / 0)
http://missoulian.com/news/loc...

"The city (Missoula) will use $380,000 in stimulus funds to replace three old playgrounds and build one new one."

Will Mayor John Engen be the next Mayor to be the object of Montana Cowgirl's scorn? He might, as he did send me a "thank you for weighing in on the Governor's HB 645 press release" email. Wonder how  MC can paint him as a "Republican"?

Certainly playground equipment is NOT part of the Governor's narrow minded "safe streets, clean water, energy efficient buildings" mantra. But then, neither are police and fire departments, courts, parks and recreation, planning and zoning, public health departments, public transportation, or many other public goods provided by local government. By the way, $50,000 will fix one or two blocks of curb and gutter. It will grind and overlay four blocks of street. It will not pay to dig up and replace very many blocks of sewer and water pipe. It will, however, provide a fifteen years guaranteed tennis court surface, for kids to learn the game and enjoy physical activity, and for adults to stay active.

Wulfgar explained our discussion well, especially the importance of Bozeman's values of access to fitness and recreation for everyone, and Bozeman's amenity and quality based appeal to those who could locate their business and families anywhere. One thing he didn't explain, that repairing the basketball and tennis courts was Mayor Kaaren Jacobson's number one priority for spending stimulus money. She wanted to spend it all on parks and recreation (like Helena and many smaller cities and towns are.) She was not available when the Governor began his attack her, and Bozeman with his national news release (and I think jhwygirl's link is accurate ascribing the impetus to Drudge). I did step forward to defend the City and Mayor Jacobson as would have Commissioner Jeff Rupp or Commissioner Sean Becker. Anyone who says Mayor Jaocobson, or Commissioners Mehl, Rupp or Becker are Republicans,or are somehow advocating tennis courts for a privileged few, is either clueless or deliberately lying.

Please note that all commissioners supported this use of stimulus money; that's seven different commissioners over two different five member commissions. It was only after several public hearings and meetings, including a meeting where the neighborhood and tennis groups got together with staff to pick the best surface, that a contract was awarded.  (And it was only after the contract was awarded that the Governor objected.)It's not a chocolate cake. It's hamburger and beans. Parks and recreation infrastructure in Bozeman is, like parks and recreation infrastructure in Missoula, or Livingston, or Dutton, or Rygate, Chinook, Helena, Superior, and on and on, necessary infrastructure for a city or town in Montana.

I prefer our system of public notice, public meetings, public and staff and neighborhood interactions, and open bid process, and reliance on the law, to the Governor's tyranny of one man's opinion unsupported by the legislature or the law.

It's a lie to say that I'm responsible for the Facebook incident. But, like the tennis courts, I stood up and took action when the Mayor was unavailable. I understood then, and now, why the Mayor wasn't available and why the job fell to me. I'll take whatever fallout there is for that.

I replied on MC's other post regarding the inability to discriminate in favor of Montana companies; it's illegal for governmental entities in Montana to show preference, and I quoted Governor Schweitzer saying so in the Gazette.

I saw some neighborhood association members, and a couple of parks and recreation board members, and maybe two people who worked to pick the vendor and surface due to their interest in tennis or the park, in the crowd Monday night. The people who spoke were not "Krauss supporters" so much and "parks and recreation supporters". Much of the crowd was there to support my proposal to add sexual preference and gender identity to the city's non-discrimination in hiring and employee benefit policies. I have a hard time buying MC's assertion that they were "partisan" republicans. Readers of this blog should have the same difficulty.

I can only assume that this website is content to allow Montana Cowgirl's calumny.  For the rest of the contributors and readers, you should reflect on what Wulfgar and jhwygirl are saying and wonder why, if I'm such a total rude republican idiot as Montana Cowgirl suggests, why it is that they would make an effort to come here and correct the record.



[ Parent ]
No disrespect to tennis players, but... (0.00 / 0)
Where I'm from, it's impossible to play tennis on the gravel roads and uneven blacktops, but bully to those Montanans who participate in that sport. I am curious, though, about how many Bozemanites the new-fangled tennis court benefits. Do most of the residents of the city play tennis? Did the mayor survey everyone from students to those who live in mobile home parks to those who live in the swankier parts of town? No disrespect to the tennis-playing public, but spending my money on a fancy tennis court for a relatively small handful of the already-fit doesn't sit right.

I recently was in Bozeman and noticed that some of the streets curbs and gutters were in utter disrepair. That's the kind of investment in our infrastructure I thought the federal stimulus money was to go toward, and that's what the Governor was speaking about. He should be calling out frivolous spending, and I hope other leaders follow the Governor's good example.  


There are more important things in life then having the latest tennis coating. (0.00 / 0)
I've got family in Bozeman, and they deserve better than this.

To quote one of my favorite movies ... (0.00 / 0)
"Deserve's got nothin to do with it."

I have noticed that in your tirades against Jeff Krauss and the duly elected city government, you don't indicate what the citizens who live here do deserve.  Better curbs?  Stim money is being spent on those.  Water treatment?  More stim money goes there.  Attracting jobs?  That is precisely what Krauss and the rather more liberal than you think city commission has voted to do by repairing recreational facilities.

Yes, there are always "more important things in life" than having what you hold some kind of grudge over. We could have given all that money to the poor, or paid for more people to see Avatar and be impressed with it's grandeur.  We could have bought video games to keep Bozeman teens off the streets at night.  We could have hired another cop, for a year.  Hell, $45,000 would go a ways to paying some of my debt, making me a better consumer.  That's awfully important to me.  "Importance" is often very subjective.  You've made a poor case here for what you think is "important" because all you've done is attack others for not reading your mind first, and following your will.  Generating a higher quality of life in effort to  attract jobs to Bozeman seems damned important to myself and others.  The question is, why do you find that so unimportant?

I believe your phrase was:  Game, Set and Match.    


[ Parent ]
The WSJ praises Schweitzer? (0.00 / 0)
An aside from the Krause-Gov. controversy: that WSJ editorial was bulls**t.  Now I think that Schweitzer has done a decent job handling Montana's budget.  The Wall Street Journal editorial says that Brian should be running congress because of his fiscal restraint.  What a crock.  Montana isn't the United States and it isn't Montana's job to stimulate the nation's economy.  Applying Schweitzer's budget tinkering to the country's economic meltdown would be stupid ... but then almost all of those far-right WSJ editorials are stupid.

And while I don't agree with everything Obama has done to resurrect the economy, if he were to follow the WSJ's recommendations, we'd really be up the creek.  


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox