Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads


-->
Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Roger Koopman's Crazy Train

by: Matt Singer

Fri Feb 05, 2010 at 13:25:53 PM MST


All aboard. Roger Koopman, the former Bozeman-area legislator who left the legislature after his liberty tree was pruned too often, is launching yet another organization aimed at destroying the government (Roger had something like a half dozen PACs operating in 2008).

Say hello to the Montana Conservative Alliance.

From the Chronicle's news story this morning:

"Democrats don't negotiate their basic principles, and Republicans, depending on the Republican, often do. The more liberal leaning Republicans do," Koopman, executive director of the new group, said Thursday.
Hahahahahahaha. I think Mark T's head just exploded. Probably Harry Reid's, too, for a different reason.

The questionnaire being circulated by the Alliance is a doozy. 51 litmus test questions. I don't know which one to highlight, but the results of the questionnaire would be absolutely fascinating to read.

Roger Koopman: Building a Smaller Tent

The good news for sane Republicans (which used to number quite a few) is that some people are pushing back. Senator Dave Lewis, who fits into the "conservative but not crazy" corner of the modern GOP matrix, had this to say to the Chronicle:

One potential alliance target, Sen. Dave Lewis, R-Helena, said he threw out the questionnaire shortly after reading it Thursday. He called it "one of those when did you stop beating your wife" questionnaires.

"Look, I work very hard to try to represent six counties, and Roger can take his shot," Lewis said. "I don't believe in tax increases. I balance the budget by cutting spending. I'm pro-life, but I couldn't answer the questionnaire, so I tossed it. If Roger wants to get someone to run against me, go for it, and we'll have a primary. I've got a 10-year voting record in the Legislature. If he has any questions, he can take a look."

Sad that we'd have to come to Dave Lewis's defense. He really is a run of the mill conservative Republican. He's just not looking to move to a government with only one agency comprised of morality police. So he is being targeted for a primary.

Mark my words, though, if Roger Koopman succeeds in destroying the last vestiges of the reasonable conservative movement, the Republican Party is in deep shit. 35% of the population is not enough to win governing majorities in this state.

Matt Singer :: Roger Koopman's Crazy Train
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"35% of the population is not enough to win " (0.00 / 0)
Even if disaffected independents, libertarians and dems get on the anti-incumbent bandwagon? Talk about taking the voting populace for granted.

It is dangerous to think that republicans will sink themselves through the application of ideological litmus tests. But if that's what democrats want to believe, then they don't have to worry about the rising populist anti-Washington, anti-incumbent sentiment that is rocking all sides of the political isle. Because it just cements their inability to read the public mood, and to legislate accordingly. And they will be swept away in a republican landslide this fall.

Dems using the strategy of letting republicans beat themselves, and complacency in reading and reacting to the public mood is what got Scott Brown elected in MA. All the wrong lessons... all the wrong lessons.

My advice? Ignore the republicans and their little ideological purity tests. Get out on the streets, knock on doors, find out what people think and want. Then find some answers and fight for them. There's a time for politics, and a time for governing. Republicans don't want to govern, and dems have found themselves unable to--in other words the republicans are winning. Dems need to figure out how to govern effectively, or there is no reason to elect them, and the pendulum will swing to the right for another decade.

A mandate is such a terrible thing to waste. But wasted it has been. And voters know it, and will act accordingly.

And to those who think that state government elections are different are just ostrich-izing. National sentiment is percolating down to the local level, and republicans are going to run against "incumbency" everywhere. If dems can't figure out how to pin the tail on the elephant--and republicans sure the h*ll have figured out how to pin the tail on the donkey--and differentiate themselves from the status quo, it's all over but for post mortem.


Questionnaires - (0.00 / 0)

If Dave Lewis doesn't want to fill out a questionnaire, I don't blame him.

Lewis has been what I consider a good legislator, and I'm sure the voters will not forget that.

Especially this election cycle, when having a (D) behind your name is going to cost you 10 percentage points right off the bat.

35% Matt? Are you predicting a major Democratic victory in Montana in November? LOL


Learn to read, Eric n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Maybe I have ADD, but... (0.00 / 0)
my eyes pretty much glazed over before I even finished answering all the questions in that questionaire.  I guess that I'm confused.  How are the responses to the questionaire supposed to help the candidates Kookman supports?  I mean, you'd have to have the answers in advance I would assume.  In other words, there's nothing catchy about a questionaire that feels like punishment to have to fill out.  I doubt it will resonate with the public, even the kooks.

It would be MUCH catchier to do the publicity stunts.  You know, like the hats with tea bags.  So, my modest suggestion to Kookman would be that if he REALLY wants to catch the public's eye and emphasize purity, instead of a tea bag hat, he gets all his candidates to wear chastity belts with a little lock on front!  Now THAT'S party purity!  AND it shows that one supports abstinence, and if you're abstinent, you can't have an abortion either!  Then, maybe a little holster in the chastity belt for one's concealed carry, with maybe a moneky tail out the back to indicate disdain for eviloution!  Yep.  THAT otter do it.  For you see, I say if you're gonna go kooky, go all the way!  People remember that stuff, and the kooks eat it up.


[ Parent ]
Holy Crap (0.00 / 0)
INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate, on a scale of 5 to 1, your level of agreement or disagreement with
each of the following policy positions and belief statements. ( 5 = strongly agree; 4
= moderately agree; 3 = neutral/undecided; 2 = moderately disagree; 1 = strongly
disagree) Feel free to write additional comments or explanations if you wish.
Answer all questions. Skipped questions will be marked as "wrong" answers.

I just want to see the answer key to this thingy.  Who wrote it?  Did the Lie Monkey just wizard this shit up one night after too many RedBulls?  For each question you have 1 right answer and 4 wrong answers, if the instructions are to be taken at all seriously.  Since the 'right' answer is always going to be a 1 or a 5, what's to stop some enterprising Republicant from lying his way through just to silence the shrieks from the Lie Monkey?  Having finally read this thing, my complaints could continue but I don't feel like typing that much.

I truly thought it impossible for Koopman to appear any more ridiculous than he has in the past.  Imagine my embarrassment at being so terribly wrong.


Ok, I had to do it (0.00 / 0)
I rewrote the dang thing. Makes more sense now.

Enjoy:

MCA Litmus test


Seriously LOL (0.00 / 0)
Buddy, you got way too much time on your hands.

[ Parent ]
Slow day at work (0.00 / 0)
No billables, so I get to do as I please. ;-)  

[ Parent ]
One Mans Nut (0.00 / 0)
Hey, I'm from the Bitterroot, this is tame compared to the petition they have circulating down here. I'm going Tea Party all the way, get this thing over with so we can start anew.

Same as it ever was. (0.00 / 0)
I grew up in the Bitterroot.  Doesn't appear that it's changed a bit.

[ Parent ]
As opposed, of course, to areas of unmitigated munificense (0.00 / 0)
like the Bighole, Madison, Jefferson, and Gallatin country?

[ Parent ]
Your ignernce is showing, jed. (0.00 / 0)
Compare Madison county to Lake county, or Ravalli or Lincoln, then get back to me.

As for Gallatin, yeah, we got us some big ass kooks here.  Sales, Koopman, Sinrud.  But as least we balance them with Wheat, Wilmer and Pomnichowski.


[ Parent ]
Just giving you opportunity for more preening, wulf. (0.00 / 0)


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Should Congress focus more on creating jobs or reducing the short-term deficit?
Creating Jobs
Reducing the Short-Term Deficit

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox