Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

The Rehberg Fundraising Puzzle

by: Montana Cowgirl

Fri Apr 16, 2010 at 12:17:37 PM MST


Quietly taking place over the last 9 months is a strange political phenomenon. Denny Rehberg is spending almost every dollar he raises.

He filed for reelection long ago, and had about $700K in the bank leftover from his previous campaign. Since then,  has raised $816k and spent $706k.  Worse, in the last calendar year, he's spent virtually every nickel that he has raised.  For example, his quarterly FEC report, filed last week, shows that in the last quarter he raised 153K and spent 160K. That pattern extends back through the last several quarters.  The expenditures are highly gratuitous--huge payments to consultants and operatives and media firms and mail houses and research firms--totally out of line with normal campaign expenditures you'd expect at this point in a campaign, showing absolutely no effort whatsoever to conserve funds.

A new candidate with great fundraising prowess but a poor understanding of how to manage a campaign's finances might engage in careless spending like this. In fact John McCain was bankrupt in late 2007 because he had pissed away money on staff and consultants unnecessarily. It happens.  But Rehberg is a veteran campaigner and has not done anything like this before.

It is even more peculiar when you consider that Rehberg is the presumptive challenger to Tester in 2012, and every nickel he can save in this year's race can, under federal law, be carried over to a Senate campaign.  Since he probably won't have to spend much against Gopher, McDonald or Gernant, (neither of which has any money in the bank), he would be saving every penny so he could start out against Tester with a giant war-chest.  

So why would he be burning through money like he is, with crazy line-items, paying $6K a month to his campaign manager (to a kid who'd probably do it for 2K), $4 grand a month to a media consultant, $6.5K a month to Erik Iverson's consulting firm, IS LLC, and tens of thousands in charges at resorts in Las Vegas and Big Sky and lots of other things like that?  

One explanation: He is going to run for Governor.

Under this theory, everything makes perfect sense. He cannot carry over money from a federal campaign to a state campaign. So, rather than hoard money that will not be usable in his next campaign, he's doing a shady, borderline-illegal, but clever thing: overpaying people, his consultants, his campaign staff, firms, etc., essentially using federal money to pre-pay for what he will need when he runs for Governor.  

All these people will give him a heavily discounted rate (wink) for their services in 2012, because they will have been previously and handsomely compensated. Heck, they might even work for free (wink) because they like him so much.

And remember, too, that a Gubernatorial candidate can only raise money in $600 increments (per-donor contribution limit), whereas a Congressional candidate can raise in $2300 increments. so to be able to off-load expenses with easy-to-come-by federal campaign cash is a luxury.  And yes, it's easy to come by.  As we all know, when you are an incumbent Congressman, special interests in DC write you checks even if you don't ask for them. You don't raise money--you simply collect.

So I'm putting down a bet at Ladbrokes. R nominee in 2012 for Gov is Denny Rehberg.

Montana Cowgirl :: The Rehberg Fundraising Puzzle
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Puzzle? (0.00 / 0)

The real puzzle here is why, or why not, the Democrats, who are the party of the rich, are not contributing much to their candidates.

Have they already written them all off, or is there just no enthusiasm?


8o (4.00 / 1)
the Democrats, who are the party of the rich

hahaHaHaHAHAHA! That line is so brazenly full of BS I'm impressed you managed to type it without the sheer stench flowing through the intertubes and wafting into everyone's homes.  Kudos on your ability to keep a straight face while spewing such nonsense.  Of course that is part of the shill job description, so I guess the Old Boys are getting what they payed for.


[ Parent ]
i know right! (0.00 / 0)
this one really is a complete joke.

[ Parent ]
80? (0.00 / 0)

You mean the Kennedy's, John Kerry, George Soros, Jon Corzine, Jay Rockefeller, Herb Kohl, John Edwards, and the rest of them are simply working men, who pull themselves up by their bootstraps to put a little bread on the table?

And didn't they outspend the GOP the last Presidential contest, pumping in $800 million to elect The Great Leader, President Obama?

My labeling the Dems as the party of the rich is quite correct.


[ Parent ]
What? (0.00 / 0)
Those are the only rich people left in America?  I find that hard to believe.  Besides, what matters is the policies the party advocates, and how those policies affect the rich, middle class, and poor.  Any examination of Republican policies will show they clearly benefit the rich at the expense of the middle class especially, but also the poor.  The policies of the Democratic party tend to favor the middle class at the expense of the rich.  Both like to screw the poor wherever they can (see Bill Clinton's Welfare Reform).

Saying the Democrats are the party of the rich because a few rich guys are Democrats is like saying the Nazi party was the party of Jewish sympathizers because a few Nazis helped Jews escape.  


[ Parent ]
good job cowgirl (0.00 / 0)
once again, you've beaten the lazy and inept montana press to the punch.  i just looked at the FEC reports--that's crazy.  of course, tester is in the same boat fundraising wise. so does that mean he too is running for state government?

Funny thing is... (0.00 / 0)
this did find it's way onto the "local" newsbriefs on that damned evil talk radio today.  Weird, eh?


[ Parent ]
tester isn't up for election in 2010 (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox