Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Republican seeks to rebrand himself after career editing racist publication, misogynist writings

by: Montana Cowgirl

Mon Jun 14, 2010 at 19:07:06 PM MST


Republican PSC candidate Travis Kavulla's current website makes no mention of his views on women and minorities.  

Lucky for us, he does bring up the fact that he was:

"the youngest editor on the staff of National Review, the conservative magazine founded by William F. Buckley, Jr."

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has a pretty good summary of the National Review's history of racist output including its support for apartheid, its opposition to the Civil Rights Movement and more like this:

Over the years many leading eugenicists and ''scientific'' racists have been warmly received by National Review. In a positive review of Race, Evolution, and Behavior, a 1994 book by Philippe Rushton, the current Pioneer Fund president, reviewer Mark Snyderman eagerly recounted the book's ''ambitious'' and ''fearless'' thesis (9/12/94): ''Orientals are more intelligent, have larger brains for their body size, have smaller genitalia, have less sex drive, are less fecund, work harder and are more readily socialized than Caucasians; and Caucasians on average bear the same relationship to blacks.''

Some might consider Kavulla unfit to serve in a Montana elected position because he has been as a top editor of a publication arguing so strongly that one race is inferior to another.

But we don't have to rely solely on the views of the publication, because, as Kavulla also writes of himself on his web site,

"as a features journalist, Kavulla has written a large number of pieces."

In fact, to learn Kavulla's views,  we can read them directly from Kavulla himself.  Kavulla's writings, some of which are publicly available on the internet, include a defense of Pope Benedict for making one of the most dangerous, ignorant, and false statements ever made by a world leader when he told Africa's people NOT to use condoms--and even told them condoms would actually make their problems with AIDS and extreme poverty worse.

Kavulla may simply be unaware of this:

The percentage of female AIDS patients who are prostitutes, or drug addicts, is dwarfed by the percentage who are married women living upstanding lives in their communities.

The Pope advised them, according to the Reuters news agency, to exhibit, "correct behavior regarding one's body." Very helpful! That advice is completely useless to the typical "woman" in Africa who contracts the disease. Her profile is that of a teenage virgin sold into marriage against her will and "betrothed" to a much older man with many lovers who carries AIDS and refuses to use protection.

Other National Review online posts appear to be designed to provoke hatred of Obama and are riddled with racist undertones.

Check this guy out for yourselves. If Travis Kavulla and the National Review had their way, I might be writing this on a "women only" section of the Internet.

Montana Cowgirl :: Republican seeks to rebrand himself after career editing racist publication, misogynist writings
Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Cowardgirl, please (0.00 / 0)
I think you're the only one attributing superiority/inferiority to those traits.  It's no more racist to observe differences between the races than to say that, as a group, blacks have darker skin than Caucasians.  It's simply a fact devoid of normative value.  Stop race baiting.

"observed differences" as you call them (0.00 / 0)
led to slavery

[ Parent ]
Progressive politics (0.00 / 0)
in its full glory.  Thank you Cowgirl for showing us what you and you view of the world are all about... again.

[ Parent ]
Yes, and I am proud to oppose racism and misogyny. (0.00 / 0)
like all progressives.

[ Parent ]
Rebrand? (0.00 / 0)

Why are you attacking Travis - to take attention away from Dennis McDonald?

Your post actually tells us little about Travis, but it DOES tell me volumes about you.


One could only wish (0.00 / 0)
I might be writing this on a "women only" section of the Internet.


You and MT Sentinal have made my point (0.00 / 0)
far better than I could have without these comments.

[ Parent ]
Nice drive-by smear job, Cowgirl (0.00 / 0)
I think it says it all that a LiTW administrator deleted a comment, which was by no means libelous or even rude, which a commenter posted earlier. (The commenter forwarded the same to me.) So much for a free exchange of ideas. As an administrator of the most active "Dextra" blog, www.electriccityweblog.com, I have only once deleted a comment, and then because it was clearly a potential libel issue. You guys need to step back from censorship and grow some thicker skin.

Anyone who knows me, knows that I am not a racist or misogynist -- and that the attempt to make me into both through my association with National Review is an amateurish and absurd smear. National Review -- for those who don't get out of the echo-chamber much -- is the magazine which is the conservative equivalent of The Nation. NRO (the website) is sort of like the right's Huffington Post. Montana Cowgirl deeming my association with NR to be racist/misogynist is equivalent to my dismissing her as a communist/socialist/dimwit/etc. It has no place in a reasonable dialogue.

I would also note that immediately after being employed by NR, I was a scholar at Cambridge through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (that bastion of racism/misogyny!) and published in such peer-reviewed (which is to say racist!) outlets as the Journal of Eastern African Studies.

And I'm still confused as to what any of this has to do with the PSC. My district is facing serious energy issues, and that's what my campaign has been about and will be about, and I expect to win on that -- and no other -- basis.

However, if you really are interested and capable in having a mature discussion on AIDS in Africa -- which means leaving some of your dogma at the door -- maybe you should first read my 8,000-word social history on the topic and, if you can resist knee-jerk claims of racism, actually try to engage with what I'm saying: http://www.thenewatlantis.com/...

Finally, not that it matters to the drive-by crowd at LiTW, but an election is a contest between two people, and at least some Great Falls progressives -- such as the president of Citizens for Clean Energy -- feel that I'm their man, not the Democrat.


comments... (0.00 / 0)
"As an administrator of the most active 'Dextra' blog, www.electriccityweblog.com, I have only once deleted a comment, and then because it was clearly a potential libel issue."

And...your point?


[ Parent ]
Let's at least keep it honest (0.00 / 0)
Travis, you are an administrator at ECW.  Leaving Rob to the side, that makes you one of three, and certainly not the primary or remotely the most active.  Simply put, it's Gregg's website and his property.

At the slight risk of being too personal about it, your anecdote hardly leaves you qualified to tell someone else how to run their website.  


[ Parent ]
Notice, that Kavulla doesn't address, or even defend (0.00 / 0)
his own writings in his response.  I think that's telling.  Of course, no one would expect him to defend the racism of the national review.

My own writings (0.00 / 0)
speak for themselves. They are published -- and not under a pseudonym -- and I've never made any attempt to hide them, or to "rebrand" myself as Cowgirl falsely asserts. On the contrary, I'm very proud of my award-winning body of work, and there is nothing "racist" in it.

And, Jay, my only point about deleting comments is that you're being thin-skinned, not to mention censorious based less on whether people engage in "name-calling" but whether they engage in name-calling which you don't like.  


[ Parent ]
comments... (0.00 / 0)
I haven't spent too much time in the ECW comments, but they seem much less toxic to me. The policy isn't about shutting down opinions I don't like, but rescuing a system that wasn't working.

So far, based on the comments we've gotten in the last two days, it's been a success.

As far as your accusations about me shutting down name-calling I don't like, you're making assumptions that I delete only those comments I don't agree with. That would be a false assumption.


[ Parent ]
This may not be the place ... (0.00 / 0)
But as an extremely active reader of both (for longer than anybody else save maybe Larry), I offer a few thoughts on ECW v. LitW re comments.  

1)  ECW's comments are less toxic.  It is that simple.  Part of it is a relative hegemony of the website in the Dextra-sphere.  Contra opinions are most often dealt with by overwhelming counter opinion.  Notice, I don't say better or more polite, just overwhelming.

2)  ECW's comments reflect the community of conservativism.  Liberals/Democrats most often seem to adore being individually right (righteous).  Conservatives most often seem to adore being communally right.  ECW quite simply has the advantage of a stronger community because that is the value they hold.  That's a system made to work despite itself.  Pretty much like Republican politics   ;-)

LitW suffers from it's own diversity.

3)  ECW was a website founded on local issues and politics.  LitW was not.  Narrowing scope inspires an agreeable readership, and in ECW's case, has from the beginning.  Most of it's commenters have a common bond.  LitW not so much.

4)  Despite Travis' tough-skinned anecdote, Gregg has been judicious throughout with purging disagreeable elements in comments.  LitW has always been more free-wheeling, and accepting of any view.  That attracts readers, but also disinclines them to comment when the more combative (yes, I include myself in that) get into virtual fist fights.

In truth, ECW has a terrific core of readers, but it is a much smaller herd of cats than those that Jay and Matt have chosen to corral.  That alone may explain much of the toxic nature of comments in these here parts.

That having been written, I now return you to your regularly scheduled thrashing of Travis Kavulla, with the hope that someone will point out his ridiculous use of the idea of 'censorship' at a private website.
 


[ Parent ]
seriously?? (0.00 / 0)
Montana Cowgirl-- Since you don't use your real name you don't have to take ownership for these inflammatory and false accusations. I'm assuming this gives you a little anonymous courage.

I, however, am happy to use my real name--Annie Glover. I grew up with Travis in Great Falls. We went to junior high and high school together, and I consider him one of my closest friends (and I do not associate with racists). He and I both coached high school debate this last school year, so we have kept in touch, and I know he has not transformed into what you describe. I'm a progressive Democrat, I have been active with NARAL, and as a rape and domestic violence crisis counselor; I have volunteered with the Helena YWCA, and I consider myself a strong feminist. Travis is NOT a misogynist, and he is NOT a racist. Over the years Travis and I have had great political and philosophical discussions, and sometimes we agree. Usually we do not. But these discussions have always been respectful and based on fact, experience and opinion... not this irrational hatred that forms the basis of your accusations.

Travis attended Harvard and was the publisher of the conservative publication the Salient. Being conservative does not mean someone is a racist or a sexist. Come on, let's move this debate to a higher plane. He then got a Bill and Melinda Gates fellowship to earn his Masters degree at Cambridge (do they make a habit of funding racists? sexists?).  He has lived for a number of years in Africa (Ghana, Tanzania); he spent a summer in Bosnia; he has traveled in Turkey, Israel, and all over Europe. For his masters he studied the effects of colonialism in Africa.

If you read more of the article you quote, you will find an alternative point of view on AIDS in Africa-- one that is based on having spent a substantial amount of time there.  I disagreed with some of his opinions on this, but I never caught a racist vibe. He is taking a different point of view-- maybe our western values of addressing this epidemic are counterproductive to what actually will work. In any case, it is worth discussing.

Your investigative journalism "revealing" the National Review as some racist rag are also pretty weak. Martin Luther was extremely antisemitic. Does this mean Luther's Catechism is actually antisemitic? And any Lutheran by association is as well? No.

For the record, Travis is none of what you accuse him of. I'm not necessarily saying you should support him for PSC. You may have some valid disagreements with his actual philosophy and politics. Maybe you disagree with his support of resource extraction? Maybe fiscal conservatism is a problem for you? Let's stop race-baiting and have a good discussion of the issues.  I happen to think that liberal/progressives have the upper hand in the debate, but this kind of post doesn't do anyone any good.  


Are you implying that NARAL supports Kavulla? (0.00 / 0)
Also, what is NARAL's position on the Pope's prohibition on condoms?

Thanks.


[ Parent ]
no (0.00 / 0)
I'm not implying anything about NARAL. I don't think NARAL makes endorsements in the PSC race anyway. I'm saying that I identify myself as a strong feminist, as evidenced by my membership in this organization.

I am not a spokesperson for NARAL. Personally, I disagree with just about anything the Pope has to say, including his stance on condoms and safe sex.  


[ Parent ]
as I suspected. (0.00 / 0)
thanks.

[ Parent ]
and to be clear (0.00 / 0)
I didn't endorse Travis. Mentioning an organization in a post does not imply they have endorsed Travis. So, NARAL, the YWCA, rape and domestic violence counselors, high school debate programs, Martin Luther, Bill and Melinda Gates, Cambridge, the Democratic Party, the National Review, Harvard, Africans, our junior high and high school... to my knowledge none of these entities have made any sort of statement of support for either candidate in this PSC race.

Just so we aren't confused. Thanks.


[ Parent ]
you left out John Morrison (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
is this a joke? (0.00 / 0)
If so... I left out your mom as well. Haha I kid I kid. ;)

[ Parent ]
a reasoned comment (0.00 / 0)
thanks for popping by, Annie, and showing folks how to write a reasoned reply to Cowgirl's post...

[ Parent ]
I call the publication racist, and his writing misogynist, not the man (0.00 / 0)
And no one here was willing to defend the publication nor the writings.  even kavulla says his writings speak for themselves.  indeed, that was the point of this post.

Shame on You, Cowgirl (0.00 / 0)
You're no better than those who tried their damnedest to tie Obama to Bill Ayers.  Or those who still smear MoveOn.org because they had a user-posted video that compared Bush to Hitler.

Slander such as this requires no though on your part.  It's mindless, and you are doing your best to contribute to the problem with our political discourse today.

Travis clearly has a large body of work, and you haven't managed to find a single instance of him actually showing himself to be either racist or misogynist.  But that doesn't stop you from engaging in this middle school taunting fest.

I've only had a couple of discussions with Travis over at ECW, and I find him to be the most reasoned, intelligent, and sane voice over there... despite the fact that we disagree on 90% of the issues.  Unlike you, I don't see that as a reason to dislike a person, or immediately peg them as evil.  

So, I am only left to re-posit the first question I ever asked you:  Who are you, and why are you such a tool?


Although I think that Travis is terribly wrong... (0.00 / 0)
and misguided in many of his opinions, I would still love to see him post here.  After all his opinions are well written, and he is a potential PSC member.  I read his stuff at Smith's site, and I don't recall him using any personal insults.  Remember, we are ALL basically guests here.  As such, we must treat other guests with respect. I would much prefer a lively debate of the issues between say Travis and Ochenski than a name-calling tirade.  How many OTHER prospective office holders are willing to come on here from the other side?  Not many I'd say.  Travis, please stick around.

And Cgirl, if you think he's everything you say, wack him, but wack him with facts.  But I think it's fair to say that from what I've seen of Travis, so far he's conducted himself well.  It's gotta be kinda scary to be running for office and purposely leave a written record behind.  Guess that's why I'll never run for office.  My written record procedes me!


Did note of you read the post? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
None of you are addressing the views expressed in his writings (0.00 / 0)
which is what I criticize here.

[ Parent ]
Cgirl, I did read it. And although I love your... (0.00 / 0)
Dopey Rehburp stuff  and many of your other fine articles, I was very uncomfortable with your guilt by association piece above on Kavulla.  That's all.  I'm NOT saying to stop the hardhitting stuff.  You definitely bring a fresh perspective to the forum.  Your take on things can be very persuasive.  But all I'm  saying is that wait until Kavulla has a record  like Dopey's before you pound the shit outta the guy.  OK?  Ferchissakes, the guy's an up and comer.  Let him get UP before you wack him down.

[ Parent ]
Larry, I appreciate your comments and perspective even when we disagree. (0.00 / 0)
My point is that a man's own writings do not fall under the category of "guilt by association"

[ Parent ]
I would like to link to some work that a very good friend (0.00 / 0)
of mine has done on this question in April 2009. He's a 100% stats guy, so you won't see much ideological bias in his analysis (though maybe in his commentary, he's progressive).

btw, this is where we publish our stats work, it's worth a read, though we update it only infrequently

Generally, I don't think that editing the National Review alone is enough to discredit someone for office. I diary and comment over at DailyKos, and there are a lot of nuts over there. I don't think that this should disqualify me, if I ever were to run for office.

And while I don't fully agree with Kullava's post on AIDS, I think it's a reasonable point to have. Social engineering CAN be a good instrument against diseases, especially in tribal societies where some elders have a lot of influence on the behaviour of many.

And distributing condoms makes people more confident to have sex, which in turn creates a huge number of people who have AIDS AND large sexual networks. If some accident happens there, it has fatal consequences. While, when the Catholic strategy of making people monogamous and reducing promiscuity is successful, an accident would only infect one person.  


As a woman, I'm going to strongly disagree with you. (0.00 / 0)
And there are multiple studies showing the positive impact that birth control has on economies, women's lives, and public health and safety.  I strongly disagree with condemning a whole continent to suffer this way.  And I'm not alone, though it appears that commenters here disagree.  

And, I'm thankful that the majority of Americans agree with me, even if you don't.


[ Parent ]
100% agree with Cowgirl on this point (4.00 / 1)
One way religious fundamentalists try to impose their values on people is to deny them access to competing views and rights that conflict with their teaching. Giving women access to contraceptives and abortion, goes the theory, removes the consequences of sex, and promotes a "loose" lifestyle and is a disincentive towards families. Therefore, less disease, etc.

Only it isn't true. In some countries with prohibitions against contraceptives and abortion, unwed women still get pregnant, abortions still occur, disease spreads, and often at higher rates than in the US. So by arguing against the use of condoms, what you're really doing is consigning people to disease and back-alley abortions.

What really works is sex ed and contraceptives. And universal access to health care (including prenatal care), cheap and quality day care, an affordable education, and available and quality drug treatment programs. But if you want to watch a conservative's head explode, suggest these as a means to reducing unwanted pregnancy and abortion.

 


[ Parent ]
This is all well and good (0.00 / 0)
And I agree that access to contraception is important... But what does Any of this have to do with the psc? Nothing! Both of you are supposed to be moderators of this ite, and you are not even trying to steer the conversation back to the issues,because, guess what, it was sadly never about the issues at all. This site has become US Weekly for political types. Which is sad becuse this site really used to be something.

[ Parent ]
see below, women make up half of the population (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
And for those of you who don't have time to click the last link: (0.00 / 0)
"It's Obama Day in Kenya    [Travis Kavulla]
Nairobi, Kenya - It must be the first time one country has celebrated the election of another country's president with a day off. But that is just what has happened here in Kenya, where President Mwai Kibaki, with all the caprice of an African leader, has declared today a public holiday in honor of Barack Obama, whose father was Kenyan. Work is at a standstill, banks are closed, as are all government offices and most shops. (Ironically, Kibaki's 2007 campaign slogan was 'kazi iendelee' - let the work continue.) Bars, however, are open and people are still hawking Obama paraphernalia and stars-and-stripes apparel. And then there are the glue-sniffing street children, who continue to beg. Sad that the first concrete effect of an Obama presidency on Kenya would be to further depress the productivity of a country that could really use a booster shot in that department."


[ Parent ]
Way out of line! (2.00 / 1)
I fail to see what any of the "accusations" listed against Travis Kavulla have to do with how he would function on the PSC? Last time I checked, the Public Service Commission had absolutely NOTHInG to do with the role of women or minorities in government.
Secondly, the notion that Travis is some sort of hidden racist or mysoginist is laughable on it's face and libelous in it's action. I have known Travis for a long time: as a  political adversary, classmate and, most recently, as my friend and my assistant coach for Lincoln Douglas Debate at C.M. Russell High School. Not only am I comfortable enough with Travis's political beliefs to let him guide some of my most gifted students, he did such a good job that I want him back on my staff next season. Do we always agree politically? absolutely not! But I will say that Travis is one of the most thoughtful conservatives I have ever met. He will discuss issues and, if he is wrong he admits it.
I think all of this smacks of the fact that the democratic party is worried that an establishment politician who, god love Don Ryan, inspires the excitement of pistachio ice cream, is in serious danger to a young candidate who is speaking frankly about the issues. I would love to see an honest debate between these two candidates, because it would help me make up my mind on the issues. Right now all that I know is that Travis has been working his ass off and wants  the job. Criticize him for his stand on the issues in this race, not on total boloney!

how does the psc relate to women and minorities? (0.00 / 0)
Um, last time I checked, women made up 51% of the population, and 8 tribes call Montana home.  elected officials are supposed to represent us all.

[ Parent ]
Ok... (0.00 / 0)
But can the psc deny access to electricity based on someones race or sex? No! Your arguments are fakachta, ad homenum attacks. Disagree with his stand on the issues related to this race. What you are doing is attempting to smear a good person by association. I could, I am sure, do the same to you based upon your association with Left in the West. Plenty of nutty crap is said on here, hell, some of it by me!) Just tell me how your attacks relate to Travis' potential job performance on the psc. You cannot do that, because your attacks are nothing more than garbage. As democrats we should be better than this sort of crap, this is the republican-esque, bush-league, pseudo-journalism that propagates the left-wing Internet and makes democrats and progressives look bad. People claim there is no difference between the parties because, quite honestly, when you lay down with the pigs, you too will be covered in mud. Rise above this sort of garbage, cowgirl.
And before you call me a big 'ol racist sexist pig, my dear, my record speaks for itself. In my last elected position, (granted, this was college student government) I was easily one of the most progressive voices at UM, representing women's center as one of my groups. Also, last year I worked for the title VII Indian education department  in the great falls public schools. I have been a trainer for NCBI in Missoula as well. I am a life-long democrat and I have yet to make up my mind about this race. Garbage such as your original post make it very difficult to focus on the many IMPORTANT issues in this race. Do you even live in this psc district? No? Then shush! I live here! I work here! And I want to know about these candidates stands on the real issues of this race!  

[ Parent ]
i can see you don't get it. (0.00 / 0)
we'll have to agree to disagree.

[ Parent ]
Show me a stand on a legitimate issue (0.00 / 0)
I want discussion on the issues. You want 3rd grade garbage cloaked in political correctness. You are viciously attacking my friend, who is trying to run a positive, issue-oriented campaign.  

[ Parent ]
Really? (4.00 / 1)
At the least, the PSC manages staff (many of them women).   But your argument, that a racists/sexist is ok, just because they do no substantively deal with these issues is absurd.  

[ Parent ]
Oy (0.00 / 0)
You don't get it. Kavulla is about as racist and sexist as I am a member of al Qaeda.I want to see discussion on the issues. You all want name calling and playground nonsense!

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox