Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

2012 rumors

by: Jay Stevens

Mon Jun 21, 2010 at 11:07:56 AM MST


Charles Johnson today mulls the rumors for the 2012 election, which should be a hum-dinger, what with a open gubernatorial seat and Jon Tester up for re-election.

According to Johnson, here are the rumored gubernatorial hopefuls:

On the Democratic side, they include Attorney General Steve Bullock of Helena; state Sen. Larry Jent of Bozeman; state Transportation Director Jim Lynch of Kalispell; and state Sen. Dave Wanzenried of Missoula.

Republicans include: state Sen. Taylor Brown, R-Huntley; former U.S. Rep. Rick Hill of Helena; Dean Folkvord of Three Forks, CEO of Wheat Montana Farms and Bakery; former state GOP Chairman Erik Iverson of Missoula; national security and terrorism expert Neil Livingstone of Helena and Washington, D.C.; state Senate Majority Leader Jim Peterson of Buffalo; state Senate President Bob Story of Park City; and state Sen. Ryan Zinke of Whitefish.

On the Democratic side, Wanzenried and Bullock, IMHO, would seem to be the front-runners in that primary (and what an interesting primary that would be). Jent doesn't have the same political charisma of either Bullock or Wanzenried. And Lynch...? That one caught me by surprise. He's never run for office before, and the DoT seems a poor springboard for a political campaign...but who knows?

On the Republican side, it's interesting that many of the rumored gubernatorial candidates are political newcomers. Zinke and T. Brown have only one legislative session behind them. Folkvord's never run for public office, but as a former rodeo champion and owner of Wheat Montana, he's got an interesting profile.

Retread Rick Hill is an interesting option. Iverson's political ambition has been long-rumored, but does he have too much baggage from his years at the head of the state GOP and on Rehberg's staff? Of the rumored state senate candidates, Jim Peterson is distinctly uninspiring, but Bob Story could be an interesting dark horse candidate.

Of the bunch, I'd say Taylor Brown is probably the Republicans' strongest candidate. He's got a high profile in the state, a ton of money, a radio network, and could probably easily tap into Conrad Burns' former political network.

But...the biggest name is missing from this bunch: Dennis Rehberg. And Johnson links his name to the 2012 Senate race. Which, frankly, I find surprising. It'd be a lot tougher race than governor, but maybe Rehberg thinks the political winds favor him. Still, 2012 will be in another era, politically speaking, and in the middle of another presidential race.

Steve Daines' name was mentioned for the Senate race, too, but, of course he couldn't beat Bob Kelleher in the 2008 primary.

Update: My bad! Daines, of course, was Brown's running mate in their epic 2008 loss to Schweitzer. I confused him with Kirk Bushman, the other businessman-turned-politico the GOP offered up that year. My bad.

Jay Stevens :: 2012 rumors
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

2012 rumors | 9 comments
All men? (0.00 / 0)
Interesting that women weren't given more consideration.  Perhaps Montana's statewide women are waiting to run until 2014...

Or, more likely, in my opinion, 2016. (0.00 / 0)
I think that the gubernatorial nomination is Bullock's for the taking. He would pretty easily dispose of Sen. Wanzenried in a primary, I think. I like both, but I still think it wouldn't be a contest.

I don't think that Linda McCulloch has much ambition to run for higher office, and Denise Juneau will, I think, wait until 2016 or 2020 if Bullock wins- she's young enough.

As for 2014, I think Baucus will run for reelection, and I'd be really surprised to see a challenge by someone serious (I don't count Melinda Gopher as particularly serious here).  


[ Parent ]
good point (0.00 / 0)
I had heard McCulloch's name bandied about for the 2012 gubernatorial race...

[ Parent ]
Rehberg won't run against Tester (0.00 / 0)
Maybe for governor but not for senator, IMHO.  Rehberg would have to raise a sh*tload of money, run a strong campaign, engage the voters -- things he hasn't done for a decade now.  He's a lazy S.O.B. and a Senate bid would require work.  Why would he jeopardize his cushy seat in the U.S. House?

As for Baucus, 270, I hear his running again in 2014 stands at about 50/50.  Still, to play it safe, every good progressive should start searching for a strong candidate to primary Max.    


Amen, brother (0.00 / 0)
Baucus won't get Democrats' support in 2014.

[ Parent ]
How about McCulloch? (0.00 / 0)
She is very popular in Montana I believe, and would have a lot of name recognition.

[ Parent ]
With 70% (0.00 / 0)
of the vote in 2008, Baucus doesn't need dem votes. He's got plenty of republicans and independents in his pocket already. If there's anything the health care battle showed us, is that Baucus has no loyalty to the dem party or love of progessive policies.

[ Parent ]
Not true (0.00 / 0)
JC, kindly remember before I leave this comment that I voted for Kelleher.

You're probably right that Max has no love for 'progressive policies'.  Okay, you are right.  But his loyalty to party (that's Democratic.  Loyalty to the boozing kind of party is Rehberg's schtick.) is kinda legendary.  Montana got to hear from not one but two sitting Senators as they were running for President.  Baucus had a role in that that was well beyond just the dollars he spent, which was also significant.  Even before he knew that his 2008 opponent was a pair of 80 year old crazy eyebrows, Max spent a chunk of his considerable warchest to support Democratic candidates, including some locally important to me, and you.  He is no traitor to the Democratic party.  To say that 2008 proves that Baucus doesn't need Democrats is, no doubt, a real feel-good thing to write.  But it just isn't true.

I'm absolutely certain that there are those who would love to ponce on in here and claim that I am defending Baucus and/or the Democratic party.  Actually, I've done neither one.  What I am pointing to is a bit of a disconnect on the part of 'progressives'.  Either the Democratic party belongs to Max, or it belongs to those who really don't like Max and really don't like what Democrats are right now.  Here's the thing.  Progressives shouldn't be looking at who they want to primary Max, if that is in party.  The only state Democrat who stands a chance against that much money and seniority in party is Brian Schweitzer.  McCulloch?  No.  Wanzenried?  Not hardly.  No, it's Brian or nobody.  Does anyone here think that they'll get what they really REALLY want out of Brian in the US Senate, as progressives, I mean?

2014 is some time away, and things can change pretty radically between now and then.  If'n I were some 'round these parts, I'd quit worrying about 2014 and start looking at 2010.  Or maybe 2012, maybe?


[ Parent ]
Whistling through the graveyard Pete - (0.00 / 0)

Tester has been such a 'Yes Man' for Harry Reid that his chances for winning re-election against any candidate are quite poor.

I really can't wait for him to come up - the commercials showing him lying to the voters will be very entertaining - especially the "Quite frankly, I don't support earmarks, period." debate. How many thousands of earmarks did he vote for?

And didn't he promise to vote to end the wars, and them vote to keep funding them when he was told to?

He even voted for Obamacare, and didn't even have the guts to discuss it with the voters.

I can hardly wait.


[ Parent ]
2012 rumors | 9 comments
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox