Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

A Few Things - Bill Kennedy Announces, Max Baucus Trounces, Bridge Access Bounces (Back)

by: Matt Singer

Thu Apr 12, 2007 at 12:16:41 PM MST


As a miniature ode to the late-and-great Kurt Vonnegut, I will be replacing the term asshole with * -- and using it thoroughly -- in today's post.

  • Bill Kennedy is in. Good. I didn't support Kennedy in the '04 SOS Primary and I think he made some mistakes in the general. But from what I know of him, he's a smart and good man. The biggest concern about him that I hear is that he lacks the "edge" to take on someone like Rehberg, but since the biggest complaint I hear about Rehberg is that he is an *, we just might need a nice guy to beat him.

  • Meanwhile, Max Baucus is close to the 60 votes he needs to get a Medicare Part D drug negotiation bill through the Senate. Why does he need 60 votes? Because Finance Committee ranking member Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) is threatening to filibuster (this is literally the kind of stuff Republicans filibuster -- low drug prices). Of course, now that he's near 60 votes, Republican Senator Olympia Snowe is saying that the bill doesn't go far enough. But rather than working to whip her fellow GOPers into, y'know, not supporting an * filibuster against senior citizens, she might try to amend the measure in such a way that it loses a few votes, lacks the support to overcome a filibuster and nothing happens. End result? Olympia runs back to Maine touting her moderate cred while drug companies probably send her fat checks for helping to scuttle a bill that would undermine their record profits. The long-term argument against Max's deal-cutting is that it treats these *es too well. The short-term argument is that they are such * that without some sort of deal-cutting, literally nothing would happen except the sucking of corporate * in Washington D.C.

  • Similar stuff is happening back home where the Governor is forcing the Republican House to decide just how much they hate the idea of stream access. Brian used an amendatory veto to insert stream access language into a bill that has already passed. Still, the caucus that apparently cares for "nothing except permanent tax cuts" has apparently changed their position. They don't just want tax cuts for out-of-state landowners. They want exclusive fishing rights for them as well.

    They have a good point, too. These rich folks from out-of-state probably invested big time in pharmaceutical companies and their pay can't keep rising at 3 times the rate of inflation forever, can it? They'll hardly even be able to afford the property taxes on their 30,000 square foot summer homes soon.

    It's just not fair.


  • Finally, U.S. Attorney William Mercer, the guy who (sorta) runs federal prosecutions in Montana, testified in a closed hearing about his role in the firings of multiple U.S. Attorneys around the country. Some of these other U.S. Attorneys were let go for failing to really be in charge of their offices. Of course, unlike Mercer, most of them were just U.S. Attorneys and, unlike Mercer, I don't think any of them ever got accused of failing to do their job adequately by a sitting federal judge in their district.
Some days I don't know what to be most angry about: the utter disregard for the concerns of most people, the constant sucking-up to corporate power, or the complete inability to do their jobs adequately.

Good folks running this country. Yes sirree.

Matt Singer :: A Few Things - Bill Kennedy Announces, Max Baucus Trounces, Bridge Access Bounces (Back)
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

God bless you Mr. Vonnegut (0.00 / 0)
If Mr. Vonnegut wanted one thing, it is for us to laugh at the shit mess we're in, at least until we get too tired to do so. I loved that * (obviously). Here's is my own ode:

Montana was one of the 50 states in a country called "America".  It was a very beautiful place.  It had big mountains and clear rivers with the best trout fishing in the whole world.  Then a bunch of rich *s from out of state came to Montana. They said poor people didn't really understand how to take care of the trout, but that they did.  They said they had to keep the poor people away from the river "to protect our resource."  What they really wanted was to keep all the fish for themselves.  The poor people tried to stop them by passing laws but the rich *s were really rich.  They thought the laws of the poor people shouldn't apply to them. 

Brian Lightbulb was the governor of Montana and he took the side of the poor people.  He told the rich *s they couldn't own those fish.  But the rich *s were just too rich and they took the trout anyway because money runs the world.  Money looked like this: $$.  And so it goes...


Saint Max Leads Low-Cost Prescription Drug Battle in Senate (0.00 / 0)
Timing is everything.  What took Sen. Baucus so long to figure out he wasn't a Republican, and the last Medicare drug benefit bill was a disaster.  Oh yea, he's running for another(lackluster, mediocre Republican)term.  Actually, lackluster would be an understatement.  As Vonnegut would say, "Someone bring me a barf bag -- I think I'm going to f-ing puke."

- steve kelly, bozeman


Yep Max is now out to undo the damage his last vote did. Does that make him (0.00 / 0)
a hero are a horror?

He voted with an awful lot of Repos last time to outlaw importing drugs from Canada, (guess he didn't like Schwitzers bus trips) and to insure medicare couldn't negotiate with big pharma. In fact Max voted for the the bill big pharma wrote. SDo it figures.

I'd love to see a non-Republican Democrat run against him in the primary. Us Democrats should promote more Democracy, not less.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox