Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Cowgirl on Schweitzer rumors

by: Jay Stevens

Wed Jul 21, 2010 at 14:04:26 PM MST


Cowgirl addresses Brian Schweitzer's claim he isn't interested in running for Senate:

My take is that even if Schweitzer is interested in the Senate-and by all accounts, he is not, since he makes fun of the institution seven days a week-he would not be researching his chances against Max Baucus in a race four years from now. Politicians don't poll that far ahead, ever.

As for Chuck's anecdote about Baucus being pissed at Schweitzer for working up the crowd at the Obama event last summer by calling for universal healthcare, that story has been making the rounds for a while. Baucus gave a speech about the importance of compromise, etc., and then Schweitzer then razzed up the crowd by calling for a Canadian health system, and then Baucus supposedly got in his face and told him he was, by giving such a speech, destroying the entire health-care policy endeavor. UPDATE: A commenter found the speech on youtube! You can watch it here....

Overall, I think the rumors are nonsense. As to Tester, Schweitzer spent a fortune in political capital on Tester's campaign, raising money, barnstorming across the state, and appearing in ads wiith Jag, his dog, talking about what a great Senator Tester would be. And Tester is a great Senator,  and progressives love him, and he and Schweitzer seem to have a strong relationship. S o that part of the rumor has little basis. Nobody I know has ever even heard it. As for a Baucus-Schweitzer showdown, that's far off but it is definitely buzzed around inside the beltway. Baucus has reason to fear Schweitzer because Schweitzer gets Democrats excited, and gets progressives excited too. However, my prediction is that by 2014, one of these two men will have moved on to become a judge, an ambassador, a cabinet officer, a CEO, a Congressman, or maybe even a presidential or vice-presidential nominee. I honestly can't imagine Baucus and Schweitzer vying for a Senate seat in a primary. So while the rumor is fun, it is probably an empty one.

So there you go.  

Jay Stevens :: Cowgirl on Schweitzer rumors
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I sure hope Cowgirl is spot on.... (0.00 / 0)
...because I'd walk MT with Max 1974 style for that primary.  

Maybe will get lucky in a couple of years and the American Border Collie Association will be looking for a new CEO.


Oops (0.00 / 0)
Kind of like the Guv, I negated to use the word "we" in my last sentence.  

[ Parent ]
If Schweitzer absolutely is NOT interested in running for Baucus' seat . . . ? (0.00 / 0)
I have to wonder who was conducting the phone poll I received a few months ago that posed the question who would "I vote for in a Senate race between Sen. Baucus and Gov. Schweitzer?"
And, yes, I said "Schweitzer," in case you wanted to know.

I don't know what the point of this poll was if not to determine the strength of Schweitzer against Baucus if such a race actually materializes 4 years from now.


Ahem (0.00 / 0)
An early attempt to determine how a Republicant challenger would fare in a hot primary year?  Just suggesting ...

[ Parent ]
Either that.... (0.00 / 0)
Or he was just testing the waters to see where he will need his "dials turned".  

[ Parent ]
Maybe Max trying to determine (0.00 / 0)
if he should retire instead of running against Schweitzer should he decide to run?

[ Parent ]
All wrong - (0.00 / 0)

The Dems in power think that Tester isn't re-electable, and that Schweitzer may be their only hope of keeping the seat.

Hehe (0.00 / 0)
That would be some power politics in the dem party. Haven't seen that in ages in Montana, if it comes to be. Fun! The only thing that would give any focus on the republican primary, then, would be if Denny threw his hat in the ring too. Otherwise the seat goes to the dem victor, easily.

And if Schweitzer doesn't take on Tester, and he's the dem candidate, just which republican do you think has a chance of picking him off? Because I really don't think it is the "dems in power" that don't think he is re-electable. I think you're confusing them with your republican and tea nagger friends.

Speculate on... oh great Coobsian!!!


[ Parent ]
Yep, now that Rehberg has thrown in with Michele Bachmann (0.00 / 0)
he's going to be awesome.  As a member of her Tea Bagger Caucus, he'll get every John Bircher, birther, deather, homophobic, racist, White Power vote in the state.

But will it be enough?


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox