Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Keep the farm, Jon

by: Jay Stevens

Wed Aug 11, 2010 at 10:52:16 AM MST


The New York Times likes Jon Tester:

Every 15 minutes of a senator's waking life in Washington is fully scheduled with meetings, hearings and votes, and much of the rest is devoted to a frantic search for money to fuel the next campaign. "Of any free time you have, I would say 50 percent, maybe even more," is spent on fund-raising, Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa told the New Yorker recently in a scathing portrait of an overstressed and utterly ineffective legislative body, one that measures acts of real significance in the single digits per term.

So it was refreshing to hear how Senator Jon Tester, a Democrat of Montana, is spending his summer vacation. While other senators drove the campaign trail, dialed for dollars or lounged on a beach somewhere, Mr. Tester went home to his farm and harvested wheat....

If more members had a life outside of campaigning and lawmaking, it might help put petty political disputes in a little perspective. Sit high up in the cab of a combine, stare out at an endless vista of swaying grain, worry about wheat futures and drought - your opponent a leaf-eating insect - and, suddenly, it should seem a little ridiculous to block an important piece of legislation back in Washington just because it would give the other party a victory.

First, while I've certainly had my legislative and ideological differences with Montana's junior Senator, there's no doubt he's the real deal. He's exactly what he seems: a farmer from Big Sandy. That's why we elected him.

Second, I'm glad the Times likes that Jon has a farm to put legislating in perspective. But as an advocacy strategy for Senate reform, wishing for more Senate farmers is a bit unrealistic. For starters, as my economic-obsessed friends might phrase it, all the incentives encourage a different kind of Senator. Senate campaigns are expensive, and growing more expensive all the time.

But it's not just the money: the inside-the-Beltway crowd - including the Times' talking heads - don't take blue collar candidates seriously. Remember, Jon wasn't favored to win his primary. The Beltway crowd liked the other John. And the state of politics - the incredible divisiveness brought on by the political right since the 60s and 70s - demands a different kind of Senator, one that's obsessed by the daily message, the political squabbling, the 5-second sound byte. You can blame the media for that too, rags like The Hill supplanting coverage by DC-based local reporters.

Here's hoping that Jon keeps the farm.

Jay Stevens :: Keep the farm, Jon
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I agree - (0.00 / 0)

He better keep the farm - he'll need something to do after we toss him out on his ear.

Whaa? (0.00 / 0)
Eric, you don't mean that you have ANOTHER moron, good ol' boy like Conrad stashed somewhere, do you?  Look, I think that once Montanans seriously reflect upon what YOUR side gave us, and what Jon has done, there will be no contest.  You see, I used to run into people  from the D.C. area all the time, and they all had Conrad Burns stories to tell.  It was embarrassing to say the least. We tried your guy.  Our  guy will prevail.  Anyone you run will either have a criminal past or be nutty as a fruitcake.  How bout the guy you'all were gonna run for guv down there in Billings?  I can't remember his name.  Turns out he was doing a fair job of embezzling or some such.    Now THAT'S the type  of candidate the Pubbies have been producing lately.  Good  luck!  (was his davidson?  oh well, does't really matter.  whoever you run is from the same mold.  your bad.)

[ Parent ]
I'm surprised at you Larry - (0.00 / 0)

Tester ran by making all kinds of promises to the Dems - and then not keeping any of them, and you still support him?

Wasn't he going to get us out of Afghanistan & Iraq, pronto, and then immediately vote to keep funding them?

Didn't he campaign on 'No Earmarks' and then vote for thousands of them?

Didn't he campaign on accountability, yet vote however Harry Reid tells him to?

Didn't he tell lie after lie to get elected, especially about Senator Burns and Jack Abramhoff, only to have the Justice Dept finally say that there was nothing there?

I'd say that his chances of re-election, given his loyalty to Reid/Pelosi, are quite poor.

I'm mostly surprised that you're not willing to hold him accountable, just because he has a (D) behind his name. Most of the bloggers here are simply party loyalists, but I didn't have you pegged as one.


"lie after lie"? (0.00 / 0)
Again, and always, I'll gladly let 2012 be a referendum on Burns' honesty.

What would you do for five grand, Eric? Would you turn your back on human trafficking and sex slavery? Connie did.


[ Parent ]
Really? (0.00 / 0)

If there was some kind of real wongdoing here, I imagine there would be some prosecutions. Funny thing is, I can't find any.

This'll be a referendum, in part on Testers honesty, as the commercials show him uttering promises, and then how he voted.

It'll mainly be a referendum though on the Dem's in Washington to whom he's so closely aligned himself with.


[ Parent ]
Referendum? (0.00 / 0)
More than 2 years out? A lot can happen in 2 years Coobs.

More likely in 2 years we'll be gauging the success of the next Congress in shaping the economy and jobs. if that is doing markedly better than today, then your "referendum" idea will work against your republican comrades' chances of unseating Tester (given that he is the dem nominee). Of course, if reps can hold out for another 2 years of being the party of no, then we can let president Palin plunge the country into a deep depression and a war in Iraq. And the only thing that will pull us out of that depression will be WWIII, and the chances of us winning that war are a wash. Asymmetrical warfare in the 21st century is a crapshoot as to the winners and losers. But I digress..

2 years ago we had a referendum on the Bush era. And we all know where that got republicans--reduced to a rump party of right wing crazies and teabaggers. This upcoming election will be republicans trying to make it a referendum on dems & Obama, while the dems try to make it about not going back to Bushonomics and letting teabaggers take over.

But forecasting an election 2 year outs? If you got a crystal ball that can read the mood of the electorate that far out, then you should start yourself a campaign consulting firm and get rich, powerful and famous. HAHAHAHAHA!!!


[ Parent ]
Party loyalist? Me? (0.00 / 0)
You're right, I'm not.  But I don't  see the R's offering up  a real candidate either.  That's all.  In fact, Eric, I'm not sure there ARE any real conservatives in Montana.  The one's that pretend to be conservative are really rightwing wack jobs WHO, along with Tester, support the war more than he does.   BTW, whom do you see on the horizon that would give him a run?  Marc Ratco maybe?  Dopey?  I seriously  can't think of a R popular enough and CLEAN enough to offer up much competition.  Enlighten me.  You know I respect your political  analysis.

[ Parent ]
Who knows? (0.00 / 0)

Nobody has stepped up yet Larry to challenge him.

I've heard a couple of Dems who want Schweitzer to challenge Tester because they think Tester has gotten himself unelectable.


[ Parent ]
Anyone But Tester (0.00 / 0)

 I'll do my best to see that this lying two bit phoney never gets another chance to bleed and defraud this country again.
 He's nothing but a CountryBumpkin, Hayseed, Baucus BOOT LICK.
 BTW...before he was elected The Banking Cartel gave him nothing - now that he's on that cmmt he's on their payroll.

  Good Riddance Jon-boy  


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox