Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Gary Marbut endorses photo-op candidate

by: Jay Stevens

Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 07:53:34 AM MST


I'm not a huge fan of engaging in stupid campaign trash talk and "gotcha" moments...except, well, I saw this letter from Gary Marbut in the Missoula Independent:

Texas legislator Dr. Suzanne Gratia-Hupp said, "How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual...as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of."

Every election cycle we see candidates with marginal commitment to gun owners doing a masquerade intended to deceive voters....

Don't get sucked in by the photo op candidates who borrow a shotgun for a campaign photo. In Montana we call that "All hat and no cows." Check candidates out carefully or trust MSSA and the NRA to have done a good job evaluating candidates for you. As Dr. Gratia-Hupp implies, a candidate's true attitude about your gun rights is a litmus for much else about that candidate.

The letter's a swipe at progressive gun rights groups that identify access to wilderness as a gun issue - something Marbut and the NRA don't care much about because...well...because those groups aren't Republican. Whatever. We'll get back to that. But this letter immediately made me think of this:

At first glance it's simply a campaign photo of Roy in hunting garb, holding some dead geese. The impression we are supposed to get is that Roy is a sportsman, a big bird-hunter, who will defend the rights of other sportsmen, by wearing his camouflage, his boots and his dorky looking outfit. The photo is now on his state campaign website, where he uses it to imply his "conservative" hunting and gun and outdoor credentials....

But alas for poor Roy, there is an unfortunate fact that has been revealed: Roy never hunted in Montana in recorded history (as far back as hunting license information is obtainable, which is to 1989) until 2006 when, coincidentally, he began preparing for his Governor's run and also faced a rare Senate challenge, from Margie McDonald who had big Dem support.

Now, frankly, I don't give a rat's *ss whether Roy Brown hunts or not, and I'm not getting all light-headed mulling over Kendall Van Dyk's upcoming You Tube video of him gutting and skinning an elk. Yes, I realize that a candidate hunts shows an appreciation for Montana wilderness, etc & co, tho' I think an avid hiker or rock climber or angler would feel much the same way. And doesn't everyone in Montana have a relationship to wilderness in one way or another? I mean, you have to if you life in the state.

But Gary Marbut cares! So, we'd expect him to endorse, not Roy Brown, the borrower of shotguns for photo-ops, but the guy who actually uses firearms, right? You'd be wrong! Marbut endorses the poseur over the hunter.

Why? Because Roy Brown is a Republican, and the Montana Shooting Sports Association, like the NRA is essentially a Republican PAC.

Don't believe me? Consider the NRA 2006 endorsing and fundraising on behalf of Conrad Burns. That was despite Tester's perfect record on the Second Amendment and his support of hunter-friendly conservation issues and opposition to the Patriot Act, unlike the Missouri auctioneer. Tester was clearly more in alignment with the NRA than Burns.

But Burns was a Republican.

Jay Stevens :: Gary Marbut endorses photo-op candidate
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I don't know shit about the MT Shooting Sports (0.00 / 0)
Association. But the policy of the NRA is to endorse every mostly gun-friendly incumbent who's running for reelection, no matter what the record of the challenger is.

That's not depending on party, the NRA has endorsed (to my knowledge) every pro-gun Democratic Congressman or Senator running for reelection this year, even though lots of them are running against pro-gun Republicans.


Gotta go with 270 on this one. (0.00 / 0)
As Bill Schneider points out, the NRA will endorse a favored incumbent over a nEwb anytime, even if the evidence is there to suggest the favorability of the new candidate, for the office in question.  I will be very surprised if the NRA does not endorse Tester in 2012.  Of course, we will revisit thsi then.  (And I want me one of those Garands.  That's a piece of history, right there.)

I'm not saying that the NRA favors open space or hunting access.  They don't.  But I'm not one of those who lives or dies by NRA opinion.

Marbut, on the other hand, is nothing but a GOP stooge, a tool of the Republicant party.  He wouldn't endorse John Rambo with a D behind the name.  


[ Parent ]
Gotta second that Wulfgar (0.00 / 0)
The NRA will always go with the sure thing incumbent over the the new guy.

Here is a brief list of 53 tight races that the Democrat has the NRA endorsement for 2010.  Always the Republican huh?

AL-2: Bobby Bright
AR-4: Mike Ross
Ca-18: Dennis Cardoza
CO-3: John Salazar
CO-4: Betsy Markey
FL-2: Allen Boyd
Ga-2: Sanford Bishop
Ga-8: Jim Marshall
Ga-12: John Barrow
IA-3: Leonard Boswell
IL-11: Debbie Halvorson
IL-12: Jerry Costello
IN-Senate-Brad Ellsworth
IN-2: Joe Donnely
IN-8: Trent Van Haaften
IN-9: Baron Hill
KY-6: Ben Chandler
MD-1: Frank Kratovil
MI-1: Gary McDowell
MN-1: Tim Walz
MS-1: Travis Childers
MS-4: Gene Taylor
MO-4: Ike Skelton
NC-7: Mike McIntyre
NC-8: Larry Kissell
NC-11: Heath Shuler
ND-At Large: Earl Pomeroy
NM-1: Martin Heinrich
NM-2: Harry Teague
NM-3: Ben Lujan
NY-20: Scott Murphy
NY-23: Bill Owens
NY-24: Mike Acruri
OH-Gov. Ted Strickland
OH-6: Charlie Wilson
OH-16: John Boccieri
OH-18: Zack Space
OK-2: Dan Boren
OR-5: Kurt Schrader
PA-4: Jason Altmire
PA-10: Chris Carney
PA-11: Paul Kanjorski
PA-12: Mark Critz
PA-17: Tim Holden
SD-At Large: Stephanie Sandlin
TN-4: Lincoln Davis
TN-8: Roy Herron
TX-17: Chet Edwards
UT-2: Jim Matheson
VA-2: Glenn Nye
VA-5: Tom Perriello
VA-9: Rick Boucher
WI-3: Ron Kind
WI-8: Steve Kagen
WV-Senate: Joe Manchin
WV-3: Nick Rahall


[ Parent ]
Fair enough... (0.00 / 0)
...still, I reserve judgement until the 2012 race, esp. if Rehberg comes out against Jon.

[ Parent ]
What does "access to wilderness" mean? (0.00 / 0)
Every single American (or person in the world, for that matter) currently does have "access to wilderness," if by that you mean access to America's federally designated Wilderness preservation system. People have all the access to Wilderness they could want, the only things that don't have access to Wilderness are cars, motors, bikes, hang-gliders, etc.

Perhaps you meant to say "access to public lands?" After all, this seems to be the Dem Party's choice of words and one of their big talking points around these parts for the past five years or so.  But again, that just doesn't make any sense as all American's have full access to public lands. What might not have full access is your car or your motors or your ATV.

I suspect the Dems went for taking a stand for "access to public lands" because they look at that as an environmental issue that they can stand up and support. However, "access to public lands (or Wilderness)" really has nothing to do with the environment, but everything to do with humans. If the Dems really wanted to take a strong enviro stand for our public lands they'd say something like "we support the protection and restoration of our public lands" and then form policies that back up this statement.

As it stands now, the Dem Party (and the Dem politicians who repeat the "access to public lands" talking point) just do a disservice to America's public lands legacy by giving the public the idea that somehow they don't have access to public lands. The message the Dems send loud and clear is "support the Dems and you'll have acccess to public lands."

This is just a real shame, because it just gives credence to some of the far right wingers who complain about being "locked out" of public lands.


So you aren't a fan of trash talk (0.00 / 0)
unless it is trash talk about a republican. Whatever.

This whole Kendall Van Dyke "Great White Hunter" thing have gotten completely out of control. So he can skin and gut an elk... bully for him. Maybe if he spent more time working on the issues and less time proving what a "Manly man" he is, he might be doing better in the polls. If Brown wins, I wonder just how many votes were because Kendall didn't campaign on the issues.

As far as the NRA is concerned, they are a special interest group like any other. When the public's perseption was that all democrats were going to take away our guns, they only supported Republicans. Now that the Obama boogieman has failed to appear, they are putting their money where they think they will do the most good - incumbants with strong gun support records. Like every other special interest group, they want their money to sway legislation and a losing candidate won't sway legislation.

I still laugh about the gun,ammo buying craze after Obama got elected. I wonder how many of those people who paid obsene amounts of money for ammo or guns during the buying craze are looking back now and going "What the hell was I thinking?". I am enjoying the bargain prices now as suppliers are trying to liquidate the inventory they stockpiled during that craze.


"trash talk" (0.00 / 0)
I'll engage now and then -- here, the glaring hypocrisy of Gary Marbut was too much to pass up.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox