Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Tester attaches wolf rider to $1 trillion Continuing Resolution

by: Matthew Koehler

Sat Mar 05, 2011 at 06:38:22 AM MST


According to the Missoulian:
"U.S. Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., has inserted language into the Senate's Continuing Resolution - the bill that funds the entire national budget - declaring the gray wolf a recovered species in Montana and Idaho.  The $1.077 trillion, seven-month spending bill is expected to reach a full Senate vote on Tuesday, and then return to the House of Representatives."

In response, Defenders of Wildlife issued the following press release:

Senate includes wolf delisting bill in must-pass funding pack age:
Provision would strip ESA protections for wolves in Idaho and Montana

Washington, D.C. (March 4, 2011) - In the latest effort to strip federal endangered species protections from gray wolves in the Northern Rockies, a Continuing Budget Resolution to fund federal government operations for the remainder of the fiscal year was unveiled in the Senate today. The provision directs the Secretary of the Interior to reissue the 2009 delisting rule, which was struck down in 2010 by a federal district court, and would insulate the reissued rule from further judicial review. If enacted, wolf management authority would be returned to all states in the region other than Wyoming. Idaho and Montana have made clear that wolf numbers will be drastically reduced in those states, and Wyoming has thus far refused to produce a wolf management plan that passes muster under the Endangered Species Act.

The following is a statement by Rodger Schlickeisen, president of Defenders of Wildlife:

"What do wolves have to do with critical funding for our federal government? Absolutely nothing. Congress should be focused on keeping our nation's essential services up and running, not going back on America's commitment to restore wolves to Yellowstone and the Northern Rockies.

"This provision would hand over responsibility for wolves to the states when their approach of late has been anything but responsible. Idaho Gov. Butch Otter has repeatedly stated his intent to kill as many wolves as possible in Idaho, and Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer recently encouraged ranchers to take the law into their own hands and kill wolves on sight. We should not be rewarding these states for thumbing their noses at the conservation of wolves, wildlife that belongs to all Americans.

"This provision sets a dangerous precedent for legislating on Endangered Species Act protections that could leave countless other species vulnerable to attack. And, by blocking any further judicial review of wolf delisting, this provision sends the message that complying with the law doesn't matter. If Congress adopts this measure, it will be a tragedy not just for wolves and other endangered species, but for the rule of law in America.

"Congress's last-ditch attempt to force wolf delisting through on a budget bill only opens the door to other riders that eat away at the foundation of our nation's environmental safeguards."

Matthew Koehler :: Tester attaches wolf rider to $1 trillion Continuing Resolution
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email

The Republicanization of Tester. (0.00 / 0)
In a state where teabaggers and libertarians cearly predominate, Farmer Jon, goes for the votes.  Principles be damned!

Against whose principles? (0.00 / 0)
Yours or his?  Just askin' ...

[ Parent ]
I doubt Farmer Jon has many principles left, rob. (0.00 / 0)
They were never very progressive.
Montana's left is pretty puny and getting punier every day.

[ Parent ]
Well (0.00 / 0)
That really kinda oughta tell ya something, yes?  But that really begs for the question:

Progressive principles, or Jon's?


[ Parent ]
Can you blame him ? (0.00 / 0)

First off - Tester has the wolf issue right -

Second - since he was forced to walk the plank for Harry Reid over Obamacare he is going to be doing a lot of things over the next 20 months to try to pickup votes.

He knows he has nothing to lose among the libs, since they'll vote for him no matter what he does, and he will have to go after 'issue' voters to have a chance.

I don't blame him -  


[ Parent ]
"Riders" a disservice to democratic process. (0.00 / 0)
Over the years I have had my differences with Defenders of Wildlife, but Schlickeisen's statement highlights what's wrong with this purely political move to delist wolves and weaken the Endangered Species Act.  

I would only add that attacking the ESA deserves far better treatment than a rider attached to a continuing resolution vote.  What's the big hurry?  Would it kill Baucus and Tester to hold one stinking public hearing to listen to constituents's views? Don't they care that each time Congress thumbs its nose at the democratic process, more and more people lose confidence in our system of government.  Restoring confidence, as I recall, was a big selling point when Tester campaigned against Burns in 2006.  Now, it feels like we've lost ground, lost confidence, and are headed down a road from which there may be no return.  

Is there any "tough love" for Tester, or is violence and back-door politics okay when it's a Democrat making bad policy decisions?    


If you're not seeing any "tough love" ... (0.00 / 0)
Then you're simply not paying attention.  And claiming that Tester's move was "purely political", doesn't make it so.  The Federal executive branch itself thought that delisting wolves in Montana was the right thing to do.  The Federal judiciary said that it wasn't the legal thing to do.  Somehow, or another, those are not political yet Jon's attempt to change the law to meet the specifications of the judiciary disagreement is "purely political".  I'm certain that you can see how some might disagree with you on that last point.  As for weakening the Endangered Species Act, I agree with you. I don't like this at all. But my dislike isn't going to propel me into misstated political attacks against someone who's working within the system by the system's own rules.

As for 'listening to constituent's views', it's rather surprising how few of the leftward acknowledge that the folk like Dan Kennedy who proffer and support HB 471 feel that they are listening to the views of Montana voters.  If wolf control were left to public referendum right now, are you really so certain that things would go 'your way'?  I'm not.  


[ Parent ]
Never say "purely," and never say never. My bad. (0.00 / 0)
Please allow me to admit my mistake by saying "purely."  Regretfully, I often misspeak.  Shame on me. But, political it is. And, of course, there's plenty of politics in the three branches of government, and in the media.

And no, I have no idea what Tester's intentions are.  I do not know what's in his heart, or in his soul.  I hope for more, but remain disappointed. We need to hear the diversity of voices, working together to work things out.  I do not believe what we're getting is the best we can be.  

And for the record, I really do not like the Senate's rules that allow non-germane amendments -- "riders" --  onto spending bills. So, you are absolutely correct, Tester is working within the system's current rules. But does it inspire?  What about the opportunity to get in touch with the spirit of the issue, and the opportunity to teach, and heal?  What prevents Tester from extending some small jesture of hope for advocates of wolves, the ESA and democracy?  I expect a lot from our elected leaders, including Tester.  I want him to work hard for a peaceful solution, instead of dictating a single, option of escalating violent. The first step toward a peaceful settlement is to lay down arms, then talk it out without taking away the voices you don't want to hear.

Why is that not possible?  I not only think it is possible, but inevitable.  To me, the struggle for American democracy is not separate from the wolf controversy.  I think fighting for one's beliefs is still worth it, however messy or inconvenient. I'm just not feeling it right now from our highest office holders.      

 


Agreed, re: Riders (0.00 / 0)
This may be straying from topic, but I agree with you that riders are loathsome, and damage the credibility of our Congress.  Montana has very strict rules about how many topics/results a given bill can address.  The right has used the carrot of such strictures nationally as a campaign tool, but that bait is forgotten as soon as an election is over.  Congress, especially the Senate, will never give up it's power to subvert democratic will.  In the Senate, maybe that makes sense.  Thad Cocheran (R-MS) probably shouldn't have the exact same voice as Jon Tester concerning wolf management.  I don't know.  Figuring that out is probably above my pay-grade.  ;-)

But, what I do favor is the line-item veto.  Yes, I am well aware of the hazards that poses for legislative efforts given a unitary executive.  It is precisely cases such as this that would show not only the desperate lengths to which legislators will go to get what they want, but also the mettle of the sitting Chief Executive.  It really is a good idea, and for that will likely not be implemented any time soon. GW claimed he wanted it (even though he vetoed next to nothing.)  His Republican Congress claimed they wanted it.  Yet the President still doesn't have that power.  Sad, really.


[ Parent ]
Bye-bye base (0.00 / 0)
Eric actually hits one nail on the head...the Demo office holders always figure the conservationists will vote for them no matter what they do.  Otherwise, so the "conventional wisdom" goes, we'd have to vote for Republicans.

What's missing from this equation is exactly what happened last November.  The Demo base didn't vote for Republicans -- but they also didn't vote for Democrats because they had so egregiously abandoned the principles and promises on which they campaigned.  They stayed home, disinterested, de-energized and despondent.  From wars to wolves, the Ds have done little but scuttle to the right, as they almost always do once in office.  But as the other, and more true, conventional wisdom goes, if people want to vote for Republicans, they'll ALWAYS go with real Republicans instead of Democrats acting like Republicans.  There won't be any big gains for Jon from his recent actions at the polls...or at the campaign coffers.

Here's just one little piece from Politico that kind of summarizes the absolute folly of Democrats trying to "take the issues away" from Republicans.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/...


[ Parent ]
ATTA BOY JON (0.00 / 0)
Very good move... I'm glad that not all Democrats have become Pelosiites- and can think for themselves...Now jump on ship with and back Rehbergs bill to do away with Presidents being allowed to designate any more National Monument/Wilderness land in Montana without Congressional approval and you'll have my vote again....

that ship is not sea worthy (0.00 / 0)
jump on rehberg's ship? you kidding me?

rehberg couldn't float a rubber duck across his hot tub.
ron marlenee's cabin boy has no idea how to pass a bill through congress. he's never done anything but attach earmarks to other people's bills......

and sleep in his office.....

when he's not suing firemen.


When my father was a young man he joined the voluntee firemen in our (0.00 / 0)
small Idaho town.  His job at every house fire was to go to the roof and cut a hole to release the smoke.  Suing the firemen is kind of like cutting off your nose to spite your face; but from time to time they should be sued...

Clearly wolves are responsible... (0.00 / 0)
...for the global warmings.

http://www.newwest.net/topic/a...

SNIPS:

Yellowstone Elk Study Points to Lasting Effects of a Hotter, Longer Summer

Green-up period, when wildlife packs on fat from young plants, decreased by as much as 40 percent in the last two decades, affecting pregnancy and survival rates among the Clark's Fork herd.

The study, conducted by Wyoming Game and Fish and the Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at the University of Wyoming, found that between 1989 and 2010, the green-up period has been compressed by 40 percent, or by about 27 days over the past 21 years. At the same time, July temperatures, which used to average about 66 degrees, have increased 8 degrees since 1989, which coincides with times of drought and reduced snowpack.

This shortening of the green-up means lower quality food for ungulates such as elk and deer, which have an appetite for and receive the most nutritional benefit from plants when they first start to emerge. As the summer continues, the plants tend to lose some of their nutrition and appeal.

The shorter season gives ungulates less time to build the necessary fat reserves that get them through harsh winters.


I appreciate the snark (0.00 / 0)
Truly I do.  But this does kinda miss the point, while making a better one that will fall on deaf ears (AL GORE IS FAT!).  Even if the anti-wolf crowd can be convinced that climatic conditions are responsible for declining elk herd numbers, and that's a big if, the focus will shift.  No longer will the argument be that wolves are killing the elk, but rather that elk must be protected from predation, so wolves have to go.  This changes the equation but not the result.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox