Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Some Quick Thoughts on the (Lack of a) Budget

by: Matt Singer

Fri Apr 27, 2007 at 17:49:12 PM MDT


( - promoted by Matt Singer)

Who's fault is this at the end of the day? Who do we have to blame for the fact that there is no budget resolution? From what I can tell, there are a few arguments, let's evaluate 'em.

Update -- By the way, Republicans, you might want to check out the folks who should be your base. They think you're now trying to intentionally lose the next election. That's a bad sign.

Matt Singer :: Some Quick Thoughts on the (Lack of a) Budget
You could blame the Senate Democrats. After all, they walked away. Of course, they only walked away after it became pretty clear House Republicans were pretty intent on walking away. After being screwed by a change in a decades old budget process mid-session, and dealing with child-like antics, were Senate Democrats supposed to just keep coddling the House Republicans? You can only appease folks for so long.

Hell, you could blame the Governor. Wasn't he in California last week? Sure, but last I checked, the Governor being gone isn't much of an excuse for House Republicans being so damn stupid. Hell, this week, we may have avoided problems if the Governor had been gone again. He may not have offered a compromise to Mike Lange, infuriating the crazy guy who is #2 in the House. The Gov put out his agenda, had his advisors in place, and left negotiations going while he took off. Does anyone doubt for a second that his team didn't know what would be acceptable and what wouldn't? And is the Speaker really so sad that he can't cut a deal with the President of the Senate without the Gov's permission. Frankly, it was a golden opportunity for the GOP when Brian left the state. It demonstrated their own lack of leadership. Brian's biggest mistake was overestimating the ability of the House Republicans to get anything done.

You could blame Rep. John Sinrud. He set a lot of this in motion by deciding to slice and dice the budget up into six eight four multiple bills, breaking a decades old tradition. But that's probably not quite fair.

There should be no doubt that without Rep. Mike Lange's derailment earlier this week, the session may have actually gotten something accomplished. Swamping the media cycle with 3 days of "Oh-my-god-the-Republican-leader-is-the-biggest-idiot-I've-ever-encounted-in-my-life" didn't help anything. And the blame for that falls right on Mr. Lange's shoulders.

But, really, this all comes down to Sideshow. Sideshow Scott Sales marched in right after the election and threw out all of his party's campaign promises. He then declared war and said he would give no quarter. He appointed the nuttiest of the nutty to committee chairmanships (in some cases, he also appointed some clearly incompetent folks -- and some incompetent nuts). Then, for a while, he disappeared, only reappearing at the end follow Lange's explosion and really failing to do much of anything.

The fact is that 85% of the blame for this outcome rests on the House Republicans' shoulders. They thought that with half the votes in the legislature, they deserved their desired outcome. Talking to folks close to the negotiations, it matches up pretty clearly with my impression from news stories: the Republicans just weren't negotiating. They were waiting for Democratic proposals and saying, "No," before denouncing the Democrats for negotiating in bad faith.

The "party of business" has no clue how to handle the negotiating table. That's pathetic.

The GOP is pointing repeatedly to some website that says "Give everyone $1,000 in tax relief." Cool idea (joking, I don't give a damn about a check -- I want my government to work properly), but here's the funny thing: The Dems had "$600 in tax relief for everyone" on the table. That's actually pretty damn big. What happened to it? Down the drain with everything else.

Where do we go from here? A special session starting maybe a week from Monday, although that's still up in the air.

Hopefully, these GOP legislators will hear from the folks back home over the next week or so. They'll be getting, I'm sure, the same question over and over: WTF.

Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Lest we forget, (0.00 / 0)
the Repubbies had COMPLETE control of the state for nearly twelve long years.  And the state survived.  Barely, but it  survived.  Where does a moron like mr. LANGEuage boy get off thinking that he needs to destroy the state in order to get his way?  I don't get it.  He and his pals are simply complete idiots!  They have  no concept of politics.  You win some, you lose  some.  What is wrong with these people?  Where were the Dem outbursts equivalent to the now nationally televised outburst by mr. teletubby when the Repugs were in charge?  There are none.  The Dems were the loyal opposition.  And the concept of the loyal opposition does not exist in these morons like lange.  Their loyality lies strictly to their corporate rightwing puppet masters.  And when the people of Montana figure this out, they'll dump'em like the freshly pinched loaves they are!  KerPLUNK!  Get  used to that sound, teletubby!

I have to agree with Larry (0.00 / 0)
Republican rule of years past was pretty darn antithetical to all I believed in, but this is just taking it up to a whole new level of awfulness. Even Judy Martz wasn't this bad. I'd totally prefer a corporate lapdog to the nuts in the House. 2008 can't come fast enough.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox