Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

F. Kafka Writing for the Majority. Joined by J. Heller.

by: Matt Singer

Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 09:54:43 AM MST


Here's some great news:
A federal appeals court on Friday ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging President Bush's domestic spying program, saying the plaintiffs had no standing to sue.
What does standing mean? It means that the people suing couldn't prove the government was surveilling them? Presumably, that proof would come in the form of a "smoking gun" like being declared a enemy combatant and getting thrown into a dark hole somewhere with no habeas corpus rights.

This is truly incredible. A secret wiretapping program that evades scrutiny because it is secret. Good work, judges, you've made a mockery of the Constitution.

Matt Singer :: F. Kafka Writing for the Majority. Joined by J. Heller.
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
hate to say it (0.00 / 0)
hate to say it but a foundation of our federal courts  states that if the plantiffs can not show any harm then they don't have standing.  I may not take you to court for the appearance or potential of harm.  And I imagine that it is going to be very hard for anyone to prove that a secret wiretaping program has harmed them.  We are going to have to use congress to change this prarticular program.

Except that there is harm (0.00 / 0)
The entire country's privacy rights have been thrown out the window without judicial review. In other words, we all now get to presume -- because we have no way of knowing -- that all of our communications are being monitored.

I didn't realize that living in a police state didn't bring non-economic harm.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox