| User Blox 4 |
|
- Put stuff here
|
Barack Obama  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.
|
|
Sat Jul 14, 2007 at 14:15:25 PM MST
|
| So it's almost been 48 hours since I posted a hit piece against Cindy Sheehan about trying to force the Democratic party on impeachment and the ensuing fracas with commenter Kate over the politics of the situation, and I admit I'm coming around on the impeachment issue. Thanks to last night's Bill Moyers segment on impeachment, I'm getting swayed.
To me it's a clash between the practical -- that is, getting 66 Senators to convict Bush of high crimes and misdemeanors -- and the necessary, the preservation of constitutional checks and balances and the rule of law, and to establish the precedent that the executive branch shall not take powers not granted it by the Constitution or the by the people through their elected representatives in Congress.
What should we do? |
| Jay Stevens :: Open thread: Impeach? You decide! |
| In the Moyers segment, conservative columnist Bruce Fein stole the show. In it, besides making a clear cut case for impeachment, Fein also held Congress largely to blame for letting the Bush administration encroach on its powers without offering oversight or holding the President and Vice President accountable. Both Fein and Nation pundit, John Nichols, agreed that Congress is currently thinking too much of the politics of the situation, and not considering the lasting ramifications of inaction.
Fein:
BRUCE FEIN: I go back to the real vulnerability and weakness of Congress, that they don't have anybody who can, as a chairman or even asking a question like John or me say, "Mr. Attorney General, you answer that question. This is the United States of America. Transparency is the rule here. We don't have secret government. That's what Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote about in the Gulag. That's not the United States of America. We pay your salary. We have a right to know 'cause it's our duty to decide whether what you're doing is legal and wise, not yours. Answer that question or you're held in contempt right now." And that's-- and all you need is that tone of voice. But what happens up there? "Well, would you please answer?" Well, are you sure? When-- could you get John Ashcroft? I mean, it's just staggering.
All you would need a lecture like that and they'd answer. They'd be embarrassed--And you have to have a certain vision, Bill. You have-- you have to have a certain depth of conviction about philosophy and what the Constitution means, why those people died. They reached that last full measure of devotion, Cemetery Hill, Guatel Canal, Iwo Jima, the Battle of the Bulge, because there was something higher. You have to feel that in your body and your stomach cause you've mastered all those people who have sacrificed in the past and you know the danger of unchecked power 'cause you read history. You're not a novice. There isn't anybody in the Congress who's able to do that because they don't have that background. But they don't have that temperament.
Damn that's good. And true. It's time our elected officials started considering what's more important: the next election, or the good of the country.
Of course, Congress isn't the only body that has obligations, argues Nichols:
JOHN NICHOLS: --back in 1974, after Nixon had resigned, and said, e must continue the impeachment process." It's-- it is under the Constitution certainly appropriate to do so. And we must continue it because we have to close the circle on presidential power. And the leaders in Congress, the Democratic leaders in Congress at the time said, "No, the-- country has suffered too much." Well, this is the problem. Our leaders treat us as children. They think that we cannot handle a serious dialogue about the future of our republic, about what it will be and how it will operate. And so, you know, to an extent, we begin to act like children. We, you know, follow other interests. We decide to be entertained rather than to be citizens.
Well, you know, and Bruce makes frequent references to the fall of the Roman Empire. You know, that's the point at where the fall comes. It doesn't come because of a bad leader. It doesn't come because of a dysfunctional Congress. It comes when the people accept that-- role of the child or of the subject and are no longer citizens. And so I think this moment becomes so very, very important because we know the high crimes and misdemeanors.
The people themselves have said, if the polls are correct, that, you know, something ought to be done. If nothing is done, if we do not step forward at this point, if we do not step up to this point, then we have, frankly, told the people, you know, you can even recognize that the king has no clothes, but we're not gonna put any clothes on him. And at that point, the country is in very, very dire circumstances.
Against these thoughts are pitted the cold, hard reality that we need 66 Senate votes to finish off Bush and Cheney.
So...what's worse? No impeachment? Or a failed impeachment? |
| Poll |
| Should Congress initiate impeachment procedings against Bush and Cheney? |
|
|
|
Results
|
|
| Poll |
| Voting. Useful or not? |
|
|
|
Results
|
|