Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Open thread: Impeach? You decide!

by: Jay Stevens

Sat Jul 14, 2007 at 14:15:25 PM MST


So it's almost been 48 hours since I posted a hit piece against Cindy Sheehan about trying to force the Democratic party on impeachment and the ensuing fracas with commenter Kate over the politics of the situation, and I admit I'm coming around on the impeachment issue. Thanks to last night's Bill Moyers segment on impeachment, I'm getting swayed.

To me it's a clash between the practical -- that is, getting 66 Senators to convict Bush of high crimes and misdemeanors -- and the necessary, the preservation of constitutional checks and balances and the rule of law, and to establish the precedent that the executive branch shall not take powers not granted it by the Constitution or the by the people through their elected representatives in Congress.

What should we do?

Jay Stevens :: Open thread: Impeach? You decide!
In the Moyers segment, conservative columnist Bruce Fein stole the show. In it, besides making a clear cut case for impeachment, Fein also held Congress largely to blame for letting the Bush administration encroach on its powers without offering oversight or holding the President and Vice President accountable. Both Fein and Nation pundit, John Nichols, agreed that Congress is currently thinking too much of the politics of the situation, and not considering the lasting ramifications of inaction.

Fein:

BRUCE FEIN: I go back to the real vulnerability and weakness of Congress, that they don't have anybody who can, as a chairman or even asking a question like John or me say, "Mr. Attorney General, you answer that question. This is the United States of America. Transparency is the rule here. We don't have secret government. That's what Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote about in the Gulag. That's not the United States of America. We pay your salary. We have a right to know 'cause it's our duty to decide whether what you're doing is legal and wise, not yours. Answer that question or you're held in contempt right now." And that's-- and all you need is that tone of voice. But what happens up there? "Well, would you please answer?" Well, are you sure? When-- could you get John Ashcroft? I mean, it's just staggering.

All you would need a lecture like that and they'd answer. They'd be embarrassed--And you have to have a certain vision, Bill. You have-- you have to have a certain depth of conviction about philosophy and what the Constitution means, why those people died. They reached that last full measure of devotion, Cemetery Hill, Guatel Canal, Iwo Jima, the Battle of the Bulge, because there was something higher. You have to feel that in your body and your stomach cause you've mastered all those people who have sacrificed in the past and you know the danger of unchecked power 'cause you read history. You're not a novice. There isn't anybody in the Congress who's able to do that because they don't have that background. But they don't have that temperament.

Damn that's good. And true. It's time our elected officials started considering what's more important: the next election, or the good of the country.

Of course, Congress isn't the only body that has obligations, argues Nichols:

JOHN NICHOLS: --back in 1974, after Nixon had resigned, and said, e must continue the impeachment process." It's-- it is under the Constitution certainly appropriate to do so. And we must continue it because we have to close the circle on presidential power. And the leaders in Congress, the Democratic leaders in Congress at the time said, "No, the-- country has suffered too much." Well, this is the problem. Our leaders treat us as children. They think that we cannot handle a serious dialogue about the future of our republic, about what it will be and how it will operate. And so, you know, to an extent, we begin to act like children. We, you know, follow other interests. We decide to be entertained rather than to be citizens.

Well, you know, and Bruce makes frequent references to the fall of the Roman Empire. You know, that's the point at where the fall comes. It doesn't come because of a bad leader. It doesn't come because of a dysfunctional Congress. It comes when the people accept that-- role of the child or of the subject and are no longer citizens. And so I think this moment becomes so very, very important because we know the high crimes and misdemeanors.

The people themselves have said, if the polls are correct, that, you know, something ought to be done. If nothing is done, if we do not step forward at this point, if we do not step up to this point, then we have, frankly, told the people, you know, you can even recognize that the king has no clothes, but we're not gonna put any clothes on him. And at that point, the country is in very, very dire circumstances.

Against these thoughts are pitted the cold, hard reality that we need 66 Senate votes to finish off Bush and Cheney.

So...what's worse? No impeachment? Or a failed impeachment?

Poll
Should Congress initiate impeachment procedings against Bush and Cheney?
No. Bush and Cheney are guilty of nothing.
No. Not enough votes. It's political suicide!
No. Bush in office benefits Demcrats.
Yes. Even if it fails, it's the right thing to do.
Yes. We'll get the votes once the facts surface.
Yes. If it fails, it's revolution time!

Results

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Impeach (0.00 / 0)
Jay, you are right to be cautious (practical) about impeachment. That said, Bush and Cheney should be impeached. The Clinton impeachment proceedings were political farce. The impeachment hearings against Richard Nixon were not. Again, that having been said, Nixon's failings were nowhere near what Bush/Cheney have imposed on all of us. No one jumped at the opportunity to impeach Nixon. Hesitation was in abundance, as it is now. Following the Nixon proceedings on a daily basis was a monumental experience. Current times are very troubling. There are people throughout the world devoted to the cause of destroying the United States. George Bush and Dick Cheney are co-conspirators in that cause. What is most important, it seems to me, is that we must be sure that if Bush is impeached and/or resigns, we don't wind up with Cheney as President (without the surrogate status). Impeaching a President is a traumatic experience. I am surprised that Bush/Cheney have not examined the Nixon proceedings more closely. Nixon tried some of their tricks and the Supreme Court and Congress did not go along. We have to get out of this mess that Bush/Cheney have created for us. Encouraging impeachment proceedings is the right course. That does not mean that (caution/practicality) gets lost along the way. Keep on keepin' on!

Impeachment is nessesary, otherwise lets just throw out the constitution. (0.00 / 0)
The votes in the Senate are inconsequential compared with the duty of the House to initiate proceedings and investigate. As you may be aware Dennis Kucinich has introduced articles of impeachment against the VP last April and has 14 cosponcers (HR333)

If and when the house finds that an indictment is warrented by the evidence, then the Senate must hold a trial and decide if chaney/bush are guilty.

Neither part of the process will be done in secret, Americans will be watching. If Repo Senators (or Dems)decide not to convict simply because they are protecting the guilty President, then the voters will render their judgement as well upon those Senators.

Remember the outrage at the OJ jury? chaney and bush are responsible for the needless deaths of over 3600 American as well as 26000 injuries. If the OJ jury was running for statewide federal offices after the trial, how many would have been successful?

So the Dems are not only ethically berift if they don't move to impeach but also politically stupid.

I wonder about the latter, given the fact that voters turned out enmasse to give the Dems control of both the House and Senate, seeking not a minor change of direction but a real change, like 180 degrees. The public feels cheated by the Dems which is why the Dem controlled Congress' approval ratings are at an all time low of 14%. Yes 14%.

It's time to impeach. I think Cindy Sheehan knows the dam is about to burst on impeachment and wisely chose now to throw down the gauntlet at the Speakers feet. The Speakers home district voted in Nov 60% to 40% in favor of impeachment and I'd bet the sentiment back home and accros the country is much higher today given the unpopular Libby pardon and the revelations of the politization of the US Attorneys office.

My bet is Pelosi will place impeachment back on the table and soon.


Impeachment is necessary (0.00 / 0)
I keep hammering on the same theme when it comes to impeachment:  Bush and Cheney are possibly not guilty of getting us into war by lying and could be acquitted on that charge by a congress that might be convicting itself as well, at least of ignorance.  But the President and Vice President are guilty of subverting the Constitution with the numerous human rights rules that they have violated and by the way they have treated our guiding document as a "piece of paper."  They have set precedents that may be used by other Presidents in years to come unless they are diagnosed and treated as crimes. 

Clinton's impeachment was silly because it had nothing to do with Constitutional infringements.  It was political.  Nixon's was imperative because he had held himself above the law.  The same is now true of Bush and Cheney.  They must be held accountable.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox