| Jon at the Montana Main Street Blog is shocked -- shocked! - that Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, poo-pooed Fortune magazine and considers his rhetoric reflecing "a dangerous animosity to free enterprise and economic growth."
The "animosity" is well earned -- not towards "free enterprise" and "economic growth," which, in this context, is relevant only for a tiny subset of Americans -- but towards corporatism, which has a real and negative effect on millions of Americans.
Watch this video if you don't know what I mean.
Jon also trashes Edwards for being wealthy and advocating for the working poor:
...does anyone else find it hilarious that a multi-millionaire who lives in a massive North Carolina mansion thinks he doesn't quite fit on a cover of a magazine entitled "Fortune?"
Why is this any less hypocritical than someone making middle-class wages advocating big business interests? Like, say, manning a blog that advocates policies that exclusively benefit the super-wealthy? Fair's fair: shouldn't that logic bite both ways?
Update: Jon misconstrued this post, assuming I was calling him a hypocrite, too. I wasn't. My point is that folks from all walks of life are entitled to their beliefs. I'm not a big fan of "class loyalty." |