Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.

Anti-liberty left divides Democrats

by: Jay Stevens

Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 06:21:33 AM MST


Jonathan Weisman in today's Washington Post profiled the battle within the Democratic party over restoring the civil rights we've lost under the Bush administration. (Warning: it's nauseating.) Naturally, civil liberties groups, rank-and-file Democrats, and...well...most Americans want Congress to restore habeas corpus, require warrants for searches, stop torture, etc & co. You know, basic constitutional stuff. However, some Democrats are nervous:

"The most controversial matters are the ones that people use to form their opinions on their members of Congress," said Rep. Lincoln Davis (D-Tenn.), who voted for the administration's bill. "I do know within our caucus, and justifiably so, there are members who have a real distaste for some of the things the president has done. But to let that be the driving force for our actions to block the surveillance of someone and perhaps stop another attack like 9/11 would be unwise"...

"People say to me, 'Well, what about the 30-second spots?' " said Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, referring to attack ads. He is pushing a bill to restore habeas corpus.

Repeat after me: this isn't about politics. This is about principle. All Congressional representatives - Republican, Democratic, and independent - should be concerned with preserving our civil liberties. The administration is perfectly capable of stopping terror attacks using the legal tools at its disposal, they do not need to violate civil liberties to guard our security. We cannot have separate laws for separate people. We cannot relax our vigilance against the executive branch's encroachments on our rights, no matter who populates the office.

Protect our country from enemies, foreign and domestic. That is your job.

As for the political fallout? As said at the Sideshow, "Tell, them it's their job to defend their position against all that spin." Not only that, but Democrats can make their own 30-second ads. To paraphrase...Grant?...Democrats need to stop worrying about what those people will do, and start making them worry about what we're going to do.

Here's a good example:

"We can do this, but you have to keep in mind Republicans care more about catching Democrats than catching terrorists," said Rep. Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. "They have spent years taking Roosevelt's notion that we have nothing to fear but fear itself and given us nothing but fear."

Some have been criticizing the Netroots for attacking members of the Democratic party who stray from the fold. But it ain't about politics! You can vote with the GOP on farm subsidies, or taxation, or whatever. But civil liberties are not an option. It's your job to preserve our democracy.

Jay Stevens :: Anti-liberty left divides Democrats
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Same split locally (0.00 / 0)
On Sept. 11 Beaverhead Democrats will meet to vote on an advisory resolution urging Tester and Baucus to sponsor or at least support impeachment of Bush.  If the resolution passes, we'll send it to our senators and publish it as an open letter somewhere.

But there are Democrats here who consider this an "extreme" measure and who will try to keep us from "embarrassing ourselves."

Bush can do a whole lot more harm between now and 2009.  I, and others here, think an impeachment movement in the Senate might begin to chip away at Bush's arrogance and sense of invulnerability which the Democratic leadership has done little to diminish.

As you said, Jay, this isn't about politics.  It's about protecting our constitution.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox