Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads


-->
Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Solar cheaper than coal

by: Jay Stevens

Thu Dec 27, 2007 at 15:02:55 PM MST


Hey, gang, there's a new solar panel on the block:

Imagine a solar panel without the panel. Just a coating, thin as a layer of paint, that takes light and converts it to electricity. From there, you can picture roof shingles with solar cells built inside and window coatings that seem to suck power from the air.... That's the promise of thin-film solar cells: solar power that's ubiquitous because it's cheap. The basic technology has been around for decades, but this year, Silicon Valley-based Nanosolar created the manufacturing technology that could make that promise a reality.

That means producing solar energy will be cheaper than burning coal - and that's not calculating the following costs of coal:

-- Fuel (i.e. coal itself)
-- the damage done by greenhouse gas emissions
-- the damage done by particulate and mercury pollution
-- the damage done by mining and transporting coal

The future of coal is bleak, folks. There will be the usual proponents for kick-starting a booming coal industry in the state, but it's a fool's game, an industry that's already wavering amid environmental concerns and talk of a carbon tax.

Not a single tax dollar from this state should be spent on promoting or buying coal-produced energy. Instead, we should be papering our state, county, and city roofs with solar "tar paper," and handing out low-interest homeowner loans to state residents and businesses who want to increase home energy efficiency and use wind and solar to create their own power. It's safe, clean, and puts money into our pockets.

Jay Stevens :: Solar cheaper than coal
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I hope you make sure our governor (0.00 / 0)
and other representatives are aware of this.

Yes, please make them aware (0.00 / 0)
Sometimes it's difficult to discern the line between comedy and seriousness as is concerns Jay's posts. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Jay just spend 3 or 4 posts talking about how Missoula "values" are really Montana "values" (or will be in another 5-10 years) and then cited Krugman in an attempt to show how progressives can win by shoving their "values" in juxtaposition to Conservative values and principles?

And you guys plan to do this by claiming that the future of coal is bleak? In Montana? And you think you're ever going to win Eastern or Northern or Central or Southern Montana on that plank? Seriously? Please tell me it's true.

Next time you flick your light switch to the "on" position, or log onto LITW to post this kind of head in your arse stupidity...remember that not only plastics make it possible...but so does coal.


I'm assuming your handle has reference to your financial state rather than the (0.00 / 0)
state of your intellect...  
This area has never been other than a source of wealth for people from elsewhere--always--inevitably--to the detriment of the land itself and the residents of the area.

To continue to exploit Montana--this time for its coal--would be to recapitualate the insanity inherent in repeating an error over and over in the hope it will eventually pay off...  


[ Parent ]
In over your head much? (0.00 / 0)
And here I thought "Jed' might have meant your last name was Clampett.

This area has never been other than a source of wealth for people from elsewhere--always--inevitably--to the detriment of the land itself and the residents of the area.

To continue to exploit Montana--this time for its coal--would be to recapitualate the insanity inherent in repeating an error over and over in the hope it will eventually pay off...  

Really? How many local people were employed by "big coal" in it's heyday? Furthermore, even if they weren't "locals" in the sense of being natives (of note the author who conceptualized that Missoula "values would once be Montana "values" is decidely not a Montanan in the true, self-reliant sense) they certainly joined the real locals in buying goods and services, paying taxes, and participating in the civil life of their respective communities. "Exploiting" someone is not providing them with a good job with real benefits which increases both the wealth of the individual but the community as well. That it doesn't quite fit in with the global warming hysteria that you and others are obviously trying to promote here, because, you know, baby seals are just so passe' these days, makes it no less a legitimate issue.

Perhaps the only "error" is expecting this website to do anything other than parrot the far-left wing, or to reconfigure posts obviously found elsehwhere for the "hometown" and unsuspecting crowd. Tell me, "Jed," do you really expect the "coal is bad" mantra to sell anywhere other than Missoula, or even in Missoula if the majority of the coffee-klatch set knew where their power really came from? Do you really expect Montana politicians of any stripe to give even a shred of credence to the idiocy at the heart of this post, and the greater argument in general?  


[ Parent ]
Not at all Rich. (0.00 / 0)
My experience has led me to think the average Montanan like average homo sapiens everywhere does not think very much beyond bedtime.

Thats the way it has always been--and should folks like you have your way--thats the way it will always be.

If it ain't broke don't fix it!

With that kind of thinking we'll just keep on pissing in the soup; and continue to complain when the soup starts to taste like urine...


[ Parent ]
gee, rich (0.00 / 0)
I thought Montanans liked being self-reliant. Here's a chance for the state to wean itself off the teat of Big Energy.

[ Parent ]
Sorry, richie, but I think you're a........... (0.00 / 0)
dink.  Please explain this statement.  "participating in the civil life of their respective communities".  Civil life? As opposed to what?  Military life of their communities?  Who talks like this?  Only a moron.  But really, richie, please be so kind as to explain YOUR idea of "Montana values" for me.  You're from Wisconsin, aren't you?  For you see, no one from Montana talks like that.  I think that you're a pretender.  Prove me wrong.  BTW, your ancestors mined a lot of coal, did they?  Post what they did, then I'll post mine!

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Should Congress focus more on creating jobs or reducing the short-term deficit?
Creating Jobs
Reducing the Short-Term Deficit

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox