Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Obama wins DC, MD, VA

by: Jay Stevens

Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 02:05:28 AM MST


Obama and McCain swept yesterday's primaries. The results:

DC (98% reporting)

Obama 75 percent (85,534 votes) - 9 delegates
Clinton 24 percent (27,326 votes) - 2 delegates

McCain 68 percent (3,929 votes) - 16 delegates
Huckabee 17 percent (961 votes)
Paul 8 percent (471 votes)

Maryland (59% reporting)

Obama  60 percent (288,117 votes) - 11 delegates
Clinton 36 percent (173,545 votes) - 5 delegates

McCain 55 percent (97,103 votes) - 13 delegates
Huckabee 30 percent (53,280 votes)
Paul 6 percent (9,921 votes)

Virginia (99% reporting)

Obama 64 percent (618,937 votes) - 50 delegates
Clinton 35 percent (344,960 votes) - 26 delegates

McCain 50 percent (242,419 votes) - 60 delegates
Huckabee 41 percent (197,650 votes)
Paul 5 percent (21,900 votes)

Obama kicked *ss, eh? Not only did he beat Clinton, but he outdrew all of the Republican candidates combined. In fact, Clinton, who gets no more than 36 percent in any primary contest today, outpolled McCain by a substantial margin, even in Virginia, a former "red" state. Looks like we can put aside those "electibility" arguments for a couple of days.

Anyhoo, the purge continues in the Clinton camp. A protégé of former campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle, deputy campaign manager Mike Henry, resigned. (The Atlantic's Joshua Green has an excellent insider report of the shakeup.)

Obama's got the momentum right now, but everything could change after the Ohio and Texas primaries. That's almost 400 delegates. March 4. Still, Obama's riding high tonight, so I think it's fitting to do a little comparing of the Illinois Senator's remarks last night with the Arizona Senator's. I think you'll find it enlightening, too...

Jay Stevens :: Obama wins DC, MD, VA
Obama:

Tonight we're on our way, but we know how much further we have to go. We know it takes more than one night or even one election to overcome decades of money and the influence, the bitter partisanship and petty bickering that shut you out, let you down, told you to settle.

We know our road will not be easy, but we also know that, at this moment, the cynics can no longer say that our hope is false. We have now won east and west, north and south, and across the heartland of this country we love.

We have given young people a reason to believe, and we have brought the young at heart back to the polls who want to believe again....

We are bringing together Democrats and independents and, yes, some Republicans. I know this. I meet them when I'm shaking hands afterwards. There's one right there, an Obamacan, that's what we call them...

We're bringing Democrats, independents, Republicans, blacks and whites, Latinos and Asians, and Native Americans, small states and big states, red states and blue states, all into the United States of America. That's our project. That's our mission.

Etc. & co.

McCain:

But now, my friends, comes the hard part, and for America, the much bigger decision. We do not yet know for certain who will have the honor of being the Democratic Party's nominee for president. But we know where either of their candidates will lead this country, and we dare not let them....

They will promise a new approach to governing, but offer only the policies of a political orthodoxy that insists the solution to government's failures is to simply make it bigger.

They will appeal to our dreams of a better future for ourselves, our families and our country, but they would take from us more of the wealth we have earned to build those dreams and assure us that government is better able than we are to make decisions about our future for us.

They will promise to break with the failed politics of the past, but will campaign in ways that seek to minimize their exposure to questions from the press and challenges from voters who ask more from their candidates than an empty promise of, "Trust me, I know better."

Still beating that old anger drum, eh, John? I know there are a quite a few Republican who revel in the politics of personal destruction (heck there are a few who troll at this site!), but I think it's safe to say this year that ain't working. But what am I saying? Divisiveness and rabidly partisan messages didn't work in 2006, either, when the GOP took the low road...

You want to know why people flock to Obama? Just revisit this post by Glenn Greenwald from way back in '06...

Americans didn't change their views because the media suddenly became adversarial or effective in its watchdog function (it didn't), nor because Democrats found a will or a way to provide meaningful opposition (they haven't), nor because the Bush administration's propaganda is now less ruthless or deceitful (it isn't). They changed their minds largely on their own, by simply looking at what is going on around them and using their critical faculties to compare what they see to the claims made by the Bush movement, and they have noticed the gaping disparities. And they are angry about it. Very angry.

Personally, I'm thrilled that in Obama we have the perfect vehicle to positively channel this anger into a vision of a working government, one that doesn't pander to its financial supporters, one that doesn't sow division and fear, one that governs well instead of operating as an instrument to accumulate power.

McCain...well...he just looks old and tired and slightly bitter.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Couple of thoughts (0.00 / 0)
First off, I am impressed by the numbers that Obama has turned in the last couple of weeks. These aren't small victories. I don't think that they change things on the ground in Texas, rather I think that they echo a pretty big shift over the last couple of weeks. I feel pretty good about this.

About the 'shake-ups' in Hillary's camp I have mixed feelings. On one hand, you could see it as 'blame shifting'. If she isn't winning, it must be someone else's fault. On the other hand, you can see it as a positive thing, in that she isn't afraid to go back on previous appointments to correct a situation (think Bush/Gonzales). Over all though, I would say that this generates a negative buzz. Changing horses in the middle of the stream is usually not a great idea, especially this late in the game.


Does the Hillary wag the Bill or the Bill wag the Hillary (0.00 / 0)
Nice Reference to changing horses in mid stream.

[ Parent ]
Chunky's right! (0.00 / 0)
This ain't about  Hillary. It's about Billy and his wild willy!  It's really kinda freakin' PATHETIC to see all these effete feminists like erica jong blaming our  support for O'Bama on misogyny.  WRONGO!  For you see, many of us libs actually LOVE Hillary!  But the thought of a reappearance of Billy's willy in the White House is more than we can take!  The fems really need to stop accusing us of hating the thought of a woman in the white house.  That's just a flat out lie!  Billy is to Hilly what Billy was to Jimmy, Carter that is.  A complete embarassment!  Sometimes ya just gotta pay for the sins of your relatives!  That's just life!

[ Parent ]
What is it going to take to make Americans (0.00 / 0)
face up to the fact that men and women are wired differently about sex? What men and women do with their minds should concern us more than what they do with their gonads...

[ Parent ]
Late in the game? (0.00 / 0)
The election is still nine months down the road..!

[ Parent ]
I think (0.00 / 0)
he's referring to the primary election... which could be wrapping up here pretty soon.

WI and HI next week in the back pocket for Obama. If Obama takes one of Ohio, Texas or Pennsylvania in a couple of weeks, it's all over--'cept for the fat delegate cats singing.


[ Parent ]
Ol' jed remembers back in "the good ol' days" (0.00 / 0)
when the nominating process took place in the Summer--usually in August--before the election in mid-Autumn; but that was before elections became showbiz...  

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox