Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Hillary Clinton Hiring Montana Staff

by: Matt Singer

Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 20:54:22 PM MST


According to NBC's First Read, Hillary Clinton's campaign is not going to make the mistake of ignoring the small states late in the fight:
In addition to focusing on the large states -- something Cecil admitted had been their focus -- they are "opening offices" and "hiring staff" in Wyoming, Montana and even Puerto Rico to try to get every delegate possible in "congressional districts where we can be successful."
Clinton's campaign had hired a number of organizers who worked the state for Jon Tester. Obama also hired quite a few.

It'll be good to see staffed campaigns operating out here for these two. It could make the race a whole lot more interesting.

Commenters at MyDD are asking about the wisdom of maintaining staff in states like Wyoming. Here's a guess: those offices wouldn't be maintained for a general. Meanwhile, Mark Penn is using primary results to question whether Barack Obama would win California in the general. Here's a guess: he would.

In both cases, conflating primary strategies with general strategies is just a bad idea.

Matt Singer :: Hillary Clinton Hiring Montana Staff
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'll believe it when I see it. (0.00 / 0)
Like the Clinton's have the money to do this when their are 4 states with over 100 delegates at stake left(Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina) and it's still over 3 months away.

This is just the Clinton lie machine trying to pander to states that they claim are important until they lose them and then they are not important.

Let's hope Rob Hill ends up back in Montana where he belongs and he'll deliver the state for another straight talking democrat.

Oh and Hillary putting money into the Wyoming? The list of reasons it doesn't count(unless she wins it):
1. It's a red state
2. It's a small state
3. It's a caucus state
4. It has 12 pledged delegates
5. It ends in an ing

Lies, Lies, Lies


Hillary's not worried (0.00 / 0)
According to Howard Wolfson, her communications director, even if Obama gets more pledged delegates during the primary season she can count of party bigwigs to put her over the top in the convention.

Their very outfront with their anti-democratic strategy.


And for every Wolfson (0.00 / 0)
there is a David Wilhelm (former Bill Clinton campaign manager and DNC chairman), who just came out and endorsed Obama, to say the superdelegates will do otherwise.

All this talk in the Clinton camp about getting the superdelegate vote to put her ahead of Obama is just an attempt to maintain an air of inevitability in the face of a loss in the public primary/causus vote.

Hopefully it will backfire, and propel Obama even further ahead, as Democrats in upcoming primaries begin to see the primary for what has become: old school Dem, back door, smoke filled room power politics vs. a new generation of ideas and leadership. A vote for the former may ensure a republican victory, while a vote for the latter is a vote to move out of 20th century quagmire politics into a new era.


[ Parent ]
Can you link that please? (0.00 / 0)
It's very interesting.

[ Parent ]
There's stories all over the place (0.00 / 0)
just Google wilhelm + obama and take your pick. I listened to him talk about it on Hardball last night. The old time Clinton faithful are wavering, and starting to cross the line. You should have seen Carville squirming as he tried to spin it on CNN. Priceless.

[ Parent ]
Sorry (0.00 / 0)
That reply was for Turner. I know about the Wilhelm thing. I wanted to read up on the Wolfson thing. See if I was talking to you my comment would be below and slightly to the right. Thanks tho.

[ Parent ]
No big deal (0.00 / 0)
But if anyone knows of a link to the Wolfson comment please post it up for us.

[ Parent ]
Innovative? (0.00 / 0)
The thing is, she already missed the boat on some small states. For example, Obama was the only one with an office in Alaska and, lo and behold, he won the state. I don't think this is any great innovation for Hillary but rather learning her lesson from her super Tuesday defeats.  

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox