Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


The Hysteria of the Day from the rightie blogs

by: Jay Stevens

Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 11:41:34 AM MDT


The latest corruption news comes out of Detroit - its mayor, Kwame Kilpatrick, was charged for perjury  for lying about an affair with a top aide in an investigation over whether Kilpatrick used city security to cover up the affair.

The mayor of Detroit is - surprise! - a Democrat.

That's the byline of a number of conservative blogs today.

Here's the thing, party affiliation is largely irrelevant in this case. Why? A couple of reasons.

If, say, Kilpatrick's party was well known for touting "character" as a prerequisite for office, claiming that it was the party of personal responsibility and morality, well, that'd be a story! Or if the politician involved touted, say, "family values" and voted against gay rights at every step, then was caught trolling for blow jobs in a public bathroom, well, party affiliation would matter!

Or, say, the corruption in the case were part of a larger pattern that connected to the poltician's party affiliation, well, then affiliation is relevant. Say, oh, I don't know, the party spun off a lobbyist who put relatives of politicians in key positions at industries across the country, demanded that those industries give money only to his party, bribed politicians and their staffers (luxury trips, say?), to enact legislation on behalf of "loyal" clients, well, that would be a story!

Just as revelations that Rudy Giuliani, while mayor of NYC, used taxpayer money to provide security for his trips to Long Island weren't about the political party he belonged to - that particular brand of corruption belonged to Giuliani, not his party - so, too, is Kilpatrick's brand of ethics solely his.

To make hay of that - well, it's a long-standing conservative strategy to attack where you, yourself, are weak.  I'll just leave it at that.

Jay Stevens :: The Hysteria of the Day from the rightie blogs
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I don't agree... (0.00 / 0)
Democrats should be forthright about fighting corruption. Period. Trying to excuse Democrats for things that we lambast Republicans for is disingenuious and makes the public just shakes their heads. It is simply wrong to try to excuse this guy.

??? (0.00 / 0)
I've read this post 3 times and I'm still missing the point where Jay is defending Kilpatrick. Do you care to highlight it?  

[ Parent ]
Is anybody actually (0.00 / 0)
trying to excuse this guy?
Or is Jay simply making the argument that when it comes to corruption, the Republicans are every bit as bad as the Democrats?
That same argument being made all the time by those of us who assert there is not a nickel's worth of difference between the two parties...

[ Parent ]
Not defending this dude... (0.00 / 0)
...I'm just saying it isn't a Democratic scandal. It isn't related to party, but to weakness in human nature.

Not like, say, Abramoff, Libby, or Craig.


[ Parent ]
. (0.00 / 0)
The fact that the guy has 12 counts against him, and yet there isn't a word of critism, is odd--perhaps an implicit defense.

And rather than splitting hairs with other Republican bloggers over how "Democratic" this scandal is, why not just dismiss the guy as immorral, unsuitable for office, and move on?


didn't I? (0.00 / 0)
But of course, I wasn't really posting about this guy, but about the rightie bloggers. I admit it's not much of an issue; I was just making fun of them. But then by this afternoon this post will have faded under the fold...

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox