Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


The Senate bailout bill passes

by: Jay Stevens

Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 11:59:20 AM MDT


The Senate's version of the bailout bill passed easily, 74-25. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid cobbled together the bailout bill on top of the AMT fix and alternative energy tax credits -- talked about often enough here -- and kicked it through, with little opposition.

It's the ultimate Senate bill. Bloated. Perks for everybody. And pundits predict it's got enough of everything to make it through the House.

Like Shane Mason, I'm not a fan.

Why? Well, for starters, this bailout bill is a little too big to slick it through with pork and tax cuts. The bill should be stripped of all that garbage, and we should focus on the bailout. Crazy, I know.

For another thing, there are a few provisions in the bill that just aren't palatable. The alternative energy tax credits? Gives a boost to coal-to-liquid and tar sand developers, too. And let's not forget that those tax credits aren't offset in this bill. So - we throw hundreds of billions onto the banking crisis...and add more debt with the tax credits, without any increased revenue source to recoup our investments? With the built-in inequity of our tax code, working Americans will be stiffed with this bill. You and me. And our kids. And our grandkids.

And again, there's nothing in here to give homeowners concrete relief. And nothing in the bill to bring some regulation to bear on the problem. And nothing in the bill to bring revenue to the government from the same institutions we're bailing out.

Jon Tester voted against the bill.

The bailout bill has been a tangled mess ever since it appeared on the scene. It wasn't clear to we non-economists what it was supposed to fix; no one likes the bill, either in Congress, the administration, the financial world, or on this much-ballyhooed "Main St" we keep hearing out; and no one knows if it will work. It's a big payment, too. And we're told it's the only thing that will keep our economy from sinking into the toilet -- and they might be right, too.

In short, it's evoked anger, bewilderment, fear, and frustration for me over the past week or so. And, yes, I'm not angry at Obama, McCain, or Baucus for passing it through the Senate -- maybe a little dismayed they didn't take up some of the more practical, progressive suggestions.

We'll see what happens to this bill in the House. I'm guessing it goes through, and we're done.  

Jay Stevens :: The Senate bailout bill passes
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thanks, Jon Tester (0.00 / 0)
I believe that some sort of package is needed to stabilize markets, restore confidence and help out homeowners.  This wasn't the package -- too much pork, not enough oversight and no penalties for those who made millions while getting us into this mess.  Congress could have certainly taken a little more time to craft a bill that was more thoughtful and egalitarian.

I suppose I should thank Denny Rehberg, too, but I'll wait to see what he does on the Senate version of the bill after it gets back to the House.  


First we had better get the credit market up and operating. (0.00 / 0)
Then lets attend to the reforms which have been needed for almost thirty years.  I'm a purist who is playing against prejudice, here; but I truly believe we are on the cusp of panic unless Paulsen's fix is put into action very soon...

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox