Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads


-->
Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Dead party walking

by: Jay Stevens

Thu Mar 05, 2009 at 09:25:23 AM MST


In today's "Montana Republicans are batsh*t crazy" news, state House Republicans offer a "compromise" on CHIP funding:

A key House committee made its initial moves Wednesday in piecing together the state budget, but it left unresolved one of the biggest issues dividing Democrats and Republicans: funding for an expanded health insurance program for Montana children....

[Rep. Penny Morgan (R-Billings)] offered an amendment that would increase state funding for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) by $10 million over the next two years, to add thousands of children to the program and capture millions more in federal matching funds.

The panel's 10 Democrats, however, voted against the proposal, saying they would agree only to fully funding Healthy Montana Kids, which expands both CHIP and Medicaid, another government health insurance program.

"I think that this amendment takes us in the wrong direction of what Montana voters told us loud and clear last November," said Rep. Dan Villa, D-Anaconda.

Voters approved the expansion by passing Initiative 155 by a 70-30 margin. Fully funding I-155 would cost about $35 million in state money the next two years.

I do think House Democrats should compromise on this issue. They could, say, agree to the Republicans' choice for card stock of the paper on which the bill to fully fund CHIP is signed into law. But to back down an inch on the timing or funding for the program, as approved by 70 percent of Montanans? Not a chance. CHIP funding shouldn't even be accepted as a bargaining chip in budget negotiations.

It's the duty of the legislature to fund the program. Anything less would be rightfully seen as the abrogation of the contract between the people and its representation.

Jay Stevens :: Dead party walking
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Batsh*t Crazy (0.00 / 0)
Hi Jay,

We have quite an interesting thread going on at the Beacon.  

http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/...

Losing two consecutive elections is not exactly conducive to me wanting to do anything with politics at all, but this is personal so I thought it would be nice to invite you all to join us.

I am so weary of the meanness and the lies that crowd out legitimate disagreements.  How do we go about getting to a better place with each other?


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Should Congress focus more on creating jobs or reducing the short-term deficit?
Creating Jobs
Reducing the Short-Term Deficit

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox