Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


F. Kafka Writing for the Majority. Joined by J. Heller.

by: Matt Singer

Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 10:54:43 AM MDT


Here's some great news:
A federal appeals court on Friday ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging President Bush's domestic spying program, saying the plaintiffs had no standing to sue.
What does standing mean? It means that the people suing couldn't prove the government was surveilling them? Presumably, that proof would come in the form of a "smoking gun" like being declared a enemy combatant and getting thrown into a dark hole somewhere with no habeas corpus rights.

This is truly incredible. A secret wiretapping program that evades scrutiny because it is secret. Good work, judges, you've made a mockery of the Constitution.

Matt Singer :: F. Kafka Writing for the Majority. Joined by J. Heller.
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
hate to say it (0.00 / 0)
hate to say it but a foundation of our federal courts  states that if the plantiffs can not show any harm then they don't have standing.  I may not take you to court for the appearance or potential of harm.  And I imagine that it is going to be very hard for anyone to prove that a secret wiretaping program has harmed them.  We are going to have to use congress to change this prarticular program.

Except that there is harm (0.00 / 0)
The entire country's privacy rights have been thrown out the window without judicial review. In other words, we all now get to presume -- because we have no way of knowing -- that all of our communications are being monitored.

I didn't realize that living in a police state didn't bring non-economic harm.


[ Parent ]
Politics (0.00 / 0)
I hate to point this out to you; but it seems this regime is winding down pretty much as all Republican regimes (save one) have wound down since 1932--without anything but murmurings--simperings?--from the usual--equally corrupt opposition.

Under cover of a designer war--the New Deal has been dismantled, the middle class ravaged, the working class reduced to near third world status, and the nation's reputation as a military to be reckoned with has been been rendered laughable--by a pack of corporate raiders tricked out as Soprano-like thugs.

Our response so far?
To gloat that it is looking bad for the G.O.P.!

Where is the rage that nearly deposed a Democrat for his misuse of a fine cigar..?


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox