Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads


-->
Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Van Dyk v. the Stockgrower Bosses

by: Matt Singer

Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 12:54:16 PM MDT


Rep. Kendall Van Dyk recently lobbed a bomb at the Montana Stockgrowers Association, laying out a strong case that the Association is out of touch with its membership. While farm country confronts the realities of the WTO trade agenda, MSGA, for example, worked hard to block Sen. Jim Elliott's resolution opposing the reauthorization of fast track.

I'm curious to hear some of the state's ranch/blog community jump in to this discussion, but I'll say this, while Errol Rice of the Stockgrowers responds, claiming to offer "clarity," he actually fails to respond to a few of Kendall's arguments -- and he just outright fails to note a few other substantive criticisms that are certainly floating in the ether -- most notably that the MSGA was invited to discussions about resolving the bridge access issue, but refrained from joining negotiations, and then later called for legislation to be killed based on their own voluntary exclusion.

The MSGA does have some explaining to do. Fortunately, Montana is one of those bizarre states where legislators, often being more part-time than the lobbyists who harangue them, are actually suited to call to account the other folks in Helena who claim to represent people back home.

Matt Singer :: Van Dyk v. the Stockgrower Bosses
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
backing the big horse (0.00 / 0)
The stockgrowers tend to support the all hat and no cows stockgrower, the big boys, and the feeders but most of all the packers.  They go right along with the national association which will fight COOL and most other consumer programs

MSGA (0.00 / 0)
We bailed out of MSGA a few years back when they came out with their policy that you had to join NCBA to be a member--now thats what I thought was playing politics!!!...

My principles wouldn't allow me to belong to an organization (NCBA) that puts itself out to represent cattlemen, when most of their policy is geared toward the Big Corporate Packers and large southern feeders like Tyson partner Texas Feeders...

I never did go back, even when after losing membership, they dropped their NCBA requirement-- because as an Independent I felt they were too politically entangled to the Republican party-- which I don't always agree or want to be connected with....Especially this last years fiascos in the Legislature!!!


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Should Congress focus more on creating jobs or reducing the short-term deficit?
Creating Jobs
Reducing the Short-Term Deficit

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox