WTF? Hawaii Senator Daniel Inouye is considering weakening or stripping Franken's anti-rape amendment, which would prohibit federal contractors to include contract provisions that would deny their employees the right to bring on-the-job rape or assault cases to court!
Er...come again? This is a slam-dunk provision, isn't it? Why would anyone work to kill this amendment?
Inouye's office, sources say, has been lobbied by defense contractors adamant that the language of the Franken amendment would leave them overly exposed to lawsuits and at constant risk of having contracts dry up....
Look, if federal contractors are worried about being "overly exposed to lawsuits" over on-the-job incidents of rape and assault, obviously there's a bigger problem at issue here, isn't there? I mean...what the h*ll? Is this a common occurrence?
The frenzy of contractors trying to kill this amendment makes it all the more apparent we need to pass this thing.
Al Franken was declared the winner of the 2008 Minnesota Senate race. Democrats now have 60 seats in the Senate. A "supermajority": enough votes to effectively avoid a filibuster. Right?
The persistent absences of two veteran Democratic senators because of serious illness, the varied ideological makeup of the Democratic caucus and the willingness of individual senators to break with the party if they do not get their legislative way make the new mathematical might of the Democrats a bit illusory.
"We have 60 votes on paper," Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, said Wednesday in an interview. "But we cannot bulldoze anybody; it doesn't work that way. My caucus doesn't allow it. And we have a very diverse group of senators philosophically. I am not this morning suddenly flexing my muscles."
But for a party and a majority leader that has been whining that it can't get anything done because it doesn't have 60 votes -- well, now it does. In other words, that excuse is now laid bare. I mean, remember how we had to be nice to Joe Lieberman because he got us closer to 60? We laughed at that logic because he didn't get us closer to shit. He would still vote with Republicans half the time, whether inside our caucus or outside it.
So yeah, I know that the "60" mark is arbitrary, and like I said in that MSNBC appearance, a new invention since it didn't exist in the Bush years. In fact, no one has promoted that notion more than Harry Reid himself, afraid to be held accountable for the actions of his caucus. Well, he's no longer got cover. Any failures from here on out will be at his feet, and his feet alone.
Right now, of course, Democrats own health-care reform. If it fails, they lose. If it passes, but it's watered down, and it doesn't fix at least some of the problems everyday Americans are experiencing with their health care insurance, they lose.
The key to healthcare reform is that it be popular with the public. The Medicare prescription bill, for example, was generally popular because it provided a clear and concrete benefit. Broader healthcare reform, however, is going to have a harder time. If there's no public option, for example, and most people simply keep the employer-based healthcare they already have, then what's the selling point? Most people will just see higher taxes funding better coverage for the poor, and you don't have to be the world's biggest cynic to understand that this isn't going to be overwhelmingly popular. Helping the poor is all well and good, but like it or not, most of us want to know what's in it for ourselves if our taxes are going up. That's just life.
Right now, we're running the risk that the answer is "not much." Healthcare reform needs a little more obvious sizzle if it's going to survive the coming tsunami of conservative agitprop, and the bills wending their way through Congress don't have much of that left...
Just a reminder to Democrats everywhere. Yes, it's sporting to find a "bipartisan" solution - but then the Republican party's strategy to make you fail. Yes, it's quite popular with newspapers to appear as a "moderate" by working with major institutions, like the health-insurance and health-care industries. Yes, I know you're always running scared, thinking about the next election, thinking about what your Republican opponent is going to say about you. But the bottom line is, you must pass health-care reform that's effective and meaningful for everybody.
Or else you'll lose.
You've now got the means. Use it, even if you have to bloody your knuckles to do so.
Before Arlen Specter's Party switch announcement yesterday, the Senate's Democratic caucus stood at 58 members. Senator-elect Al Franken represented Democrats' 59th vote toward cloture, still short of reliably ending Republican filibusters. But now, with Specter joining the Democratic caucus, Senator-elect Franken represents the big 6-0, which is why Republicans will redouble their efforts to delay Senator-elect Franken's seating - and why we in the netroots must redouble our efforts to send obstructionist Republicans a message and also provide them with adequate disincentive from delaying Senator-elect Franken's seating any further.
Since the "One Dollar a Day to Make Norm Coleman Go Away" effort started just a couple weeks ago, about $40,000 has been raised to remind the Republicans funding Norm Coleman's endless appeals that, for every single day that they delay the implementation of the will of Minnesota voters, progressive voters will raise money to use against these Republicans on Election Day 2010.
Your support will strengthen that message!
Norm Coleman and his fellow Republicans recently scored a success in further delaying Senator-elect Franken's seating, as the trial schedule adopted by the state Supreme Court for Coleman's appeal is such that oral arguments before the Court won't begin until June 1st, over a month from now. Further, although Minnesota election policy dictates that Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty must prepare and sign Senator-elect Franken's election certificate once the state Supreme Court hands down its decision, Pawlenty has hemmed and hawed as to whether he would follow state election policy accordingly.
With a D next to Arlen Specter's name, Republicans will go full force to block Senator-elect Franken's seating. Please join us in eliminating Republicans' incentive to delay Senator-elect Franken's seating any further by taking part in the "One Dollar a Day to Make Norm Coleman Go Away" effort. At right is video of the segment on MSNBC's Hardball highlighting the effort.
Even in Montana, I'm sure you've heard plenty about what's going on with the still-unsettled Senate race in Minnesota.
While Republican Norm Coleman prolongs his endless and pointless appeals, cementing his admission into the Sore Losers Hall of Fame, progressive organizations Democracy for America and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee have introduced a new effort: NormDollar.com, "A Dollar a Day to Make Norm Go Away." Very simply put, commit to contributing just one dollar per day for every day that sore loser Norm Coleman refuses to concede.
This is exactly the correct approach to take in order to provide Republican leadership in Washington with adequate disincentive from continuing to fund Coleman's endless appeals. The GOP bigwigs funding Coleman's appeals see value in putting their money toward keeping progressive Senator-elect Al Franken from being seated. This grassroots-powered effort will make them think twice by generating many thousands of dollars for progressive candidates for every single day that they fund the Coleman circus.
If you feel so inclined, you can certainly chip in a bit of change directly to the Franken Recount Fund, as well.
