Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Clarence Thomas

Doh!

by: Jay Stevens

Thu May 28, 2009 at 14:18:46 PM MDT

The wingnut "scandal" of the day: "Evidence appears to be mounting that the Obama administration has systematically targeted for closing Chrysler dealers who contributed to Repubicans. What started earlier this week as mainly a rumbling on the Right side of the blogosphere has gathered some steam today with revelations that among the dealers being shut down are a GOP congressman and closing of competitors to a dealership chain partly owned by former Clinton White House chief of staff Mack McLarty."

Reality: "There is just one problem with this theory. Nobody has bothered to look up data for the control group: the list of dealerships which aren't being closed. It turns out that all car dealers are, in fact, overwhelmingly more likely to donate to Republicans than to Democrats -- not just those who are having their doors closed."

Hilarious.

Also, guess who said this about Obama's SCOTUS nominee, Sonia Sotomayor: "President Obama's nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor shows that empathy has won out over excellence in the White House." In the same breath, the author  singles out Clarence Thomas as a pioneer in constitutional law. That's right, the same justice Dahlia Lithwick described as spending "...every morning of oral argument...in perfect, motionless repose."

Drum roll, please...John Yoo! The man who (poorly) scripted legal opinions, not based on the law, but to support predetermined (and illegal) political decisions! Whee!

Also the meme that Sotomayor is an "activist" judge rings hollow, especially when considering conservative SCOTUS darling, Anton Scalia, a former Nixon political operative who cloaks himself under the mantle of "orginalism," yet consistently backs Republican party policies that, say, deny the right of habeas corpus to anyone the president designates. Better yet (from a comic viewpoint) was his claim that torture isn't a "punishment," and, therefore, can't be considered "cruel" and "unusual" from a constitutional perspective.

And, of course, Scalia was at the heart of our generation's most "activist" SCOTUS decision -- Bush v Gore, which handed the presidency to Bush in 2000. Arguing that the 2000 Florida vote counting violated the constitution's Equal Protection clause, the court's majority "remedied" Florida's voters' rights by forbidding the state courts to define a uniform system for counting votes, and set an arbitrary deadline for counting votes that froze the vote-counting at a time when Bush Jr held a lead, prompting Alan Dershowitz to call it the "single most corrupt decision in Supreme Court history." Indeed, the decision was so embarrassing to the majority that they begged in the written opinion that courts should never use Bush v Gore as basis for any future court cases...

Whee.

Discuss :: (10 Comments)

Reality v. Clarence Thomas

by: Jay Stevens

Thu Dec 04, 2008 at 10:18:26 AM MST

Does it disturb anyone else that Clarence Thomas -- described by Dahlia Lithwick thusly, "Of all the Summum aphorisms, my favorite is probably 'everything vibrates.' Whoever wrote that had yet to meet Justice Clarence Thomas, who spends this morning, as he does every morning of oral argument, in perfect, motionless repose" -- broke his customary inertness for a fringe Internet rumor?

In a highly unusual move, U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has asked his colleagues on the court to consider the request of an East Brunswick, N.J., attorney who has filed a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama's status as a United States citizen.

A Columbia University law professor speculated that Thomas accepted the petitiion "so it would go before the conference [of Supreme Court justices] where it will likely be denied." If he hadn't accepted it, the New Jersey conspiracy theorist could bring the petition to other justices.

Which, frankly, sounds like rationalizing to me, because I can't imagine any other justice even considering the petition. I guess some folks need to find method in the madness. The alternative is accepting that there's a SCOTUS justice who finds more merit in paranoid conspiracies than the Constitution.

Discuss :: (3 Comments)
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox