Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>


User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
"Lincoln Sells Out Slaves"
by: Rob Kailey - Sep 13
1 Comments
If You Haven't Seen This
by: Rob Kailey - Apr 28
5 Comments
Impeach the President?
by: Rob Kailey - Mar 16
15 Comments
It's the system, stupid!
by: Jay Stevens - Oct 25
7 Comments

Search




Advanced Search


Rob Kailey is a working schmuck with no ties or affiliations to any governmental or political organizations, save those of sympathy.
Depression

What Comes after the Stimulus?

by: JC

Wed Jan 28, 2009 at 11:46:25 AM MST

( - promoted by Jay Stevens)

Besides an orgasm? Just a thought. With all of the current hoopla surrounding the immediacy of the stimulus package, little thought has been given to what comes next.

Like the mass transit funding. While it would be nice to get some money into the current bill, there is going to be a need for another round of legislation that sets out some long term goals, with drawn out funding mechanisms.

Not every liberal or progressive pipe dream is going to be, or should be, stuffed into the current stimulus package. It just isn't going to be practicable to do so. What needs to happen is that major programs like mass transit, energy independence, healthcare reform, etc. all need to be addressed in programatic ways, with the view towards creating legacies. And it should be #1 priority after the stimulus package is wrapped up.

But the stimulus package should be focused on short term goals: shoring up the economy by preserving and creating jobs. Nothing more, and nothing less. Anything else just gets in the way of what really needs to get done. And creates fodder for the anti-Obamans down the road.

And the funding for family planning was just the tip of the iceberg. Sure, it could be rationalized. I listened to Rep. Wexler go through a convoluted explanation, that sort of made sense if you could follow it. But why go through those contortions? If a provision of the bill doesn't get directly to jobs, then it should go into some other piece of comprehensive reform legislation, and get its full day in the sun. I'm sick and tired of listening to Boehner get a boner talking about funding contraceptives in the stimulus package.

Everybody wants to ramrod their pet project into this stimulus bill because it offers an opportunity for dems--who have been thumb-capped for so long--to finally get the long awaited orgasm that sweeping the elections and getting some needed stimulus is providing. But the stimulus is just that: prelude to an orgasm. One that when over will leave one feeling gratified, but wanting of more. One can smoke a cigarette or take a nap once it has passed. Or one can get up and get to work on the real necessities of this country.

So that's when the new long-term relationship between the people and their country needs to begin. And it needs to be carefully thought out and prepared for. And it needs to be visionar, sustainable and with longevity for all.

Comments?

Discuss :: (20 Comments)

What's up with the crazies comparing Democrats to terrorists?

by: MTwarthog

Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 06:20:01 AM MST

(Here's an interesting question. How much does that underground conservative smear rhetoric affect elections? Are swing voters swayed by blog comments or emails? - promoted by Jay Stevens)

I was reading the comments in the Billings Gazette today about Obama's visit to Billings, and the first three comments were total illogical ramblings from a user named "Obama bin Biden."  I reported it as offensive (not that the Billings Gazette ever will do anything about it).   Then I was reading the comments about Brian Schweitzer's speech - another post by OBB, but then someone used the term 'enviro-terrorists' to refer not to those that ruin our environment without paying to clean it up, but to the environmental movement.  

Neither of these users gave any evidence of sanity, but what's up with associating terrorists with Democrats?  Has the Republican party moved so far right that there is no longer room for reasoned debate?  And perhaps more importantly, how does the average swing voter react to these comparisons?  Do they associate the two in their mind, or do they, like I do, react in disgust that any human would dare insult the losses of those with family and friends that died during September 11, not to mention the soldiers that have been lost fighting the war on terror?

I have to hope that the swing voters react like me.  I would lose my faith in mankind if I admitted that those crazy comments persuade more voters than a reasoned and respectful debate.

Discuss :: (0 Comments)
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Voting. Useful or not?
Yes!
No!
Maybe, but only if you vote my way.
There are theories that ...
Meh ...

Results

Blog Roll
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Intermountain Energy
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Cowgirl
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Prairie Mary
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox