Contribute
Support Left in the West to continue our work:
Blog Ads

Syndication

RSS

Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Full Disclosure
Matt Singer works for Forward Montana. He also is a partner in DP Productions, a small, Montana-based T-Shirt company.


Search




Advanced Search


Salish-Kootenai

Feds reverse USFWS on tribal role in Bison Range managment

by: jhwygirl

Fri Dec 29, 2006 at 18:21:21 PM MST

Deputy Secretary of the Interior Lynn Scarlett announced today  a reversal of the USFWS's recent decision to eliminate tribal involvement in management of the National Bison Range.

The Confederated Salish and Kootenai tribes began a phased in role, with the ultimate goal of full tribal managment of the National Bison Range, in late 2005.  Today's reversal by the Interior Department suspends full phase-in.

Plans include the addition of an ombudsman to help sort out issues related to management of the range.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 139 words in story)

Looking for Racism?

by: Matt Singer

Mon Nov 20, 2006 at 15:52:18 PM MST

If you're looking for racism, just take a gander at the comments thread on this story at the Billings Gazette. The story is a lengthy one and an interesting one to boot -- about who will regulate and tax gaming on the Flathead Reservation.

The story is a fairly old one in government -- people declaring "taxation without representation," others pointing out that they aren't proposing a radical change to the status quo, and a lot of problems that appear to be caused by a lack of communication. For some reason, a number of commenters seem to have taken this as a sign that Indians are bad people, which is how to many conversations devolve in Montana.

That said, I'm not completely clear on the smooth way out of the question. The tribal government wants an increased say in matters on the reservation -- something fair. Business owners are saying that they want to be regulated by a government they have a say in -- a somewhat fair argument, except that they already live under tribal jurisdiction in a number of ways. And everyone says they want the employees to not lose their jobs (although some business owners seem to prefer going out of business to being regulated by the tribe, something that screams mild bigotry to me).

The state, meanwhile, isn't saying anything.

This strikes me as a good-place for the Governor to show a little get-'er-done attitude. I know he's got a lot of other stuff on his plate, but there are a number of jobs here, there's relationships between a number of Montanans, and there's a good deal of revenue up for grabs. Surely, a way out can be found.

Discuss :: (33 Comments)
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Bookmark and Share

Poll
Would kind of likely reform would you support?
Baucus plan, with or without public option
Baucus plan, but only with public option
I don't support the Baucus plan, period

Results

Blog Roll
  • 4 & 20 Blackbirds
  • A Secular Franciscan Life
  • Big Sky Blog
  • Cece-in-MT
  • David Crisp's Billings Blog
  • David Sirota
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Ecorover
  • Granny Insanity
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Intelligent Discontent
  • Lamnidae
  • Lesley's Podcast
  • Livingston, I Presume
  • Great Falls Firefly
  • Montana Main St.
  • Montana Maven
  • Montana Netroots
  • Montana Politics
  • Montana With kids
  • Patia Stephens
  • Piece of Mind
  • Pragmatic Revolt
  • Prairie Mary
  • Rebels Are We
  • Speedkill
  • Sporky
  • The Alberton Papers
  • The Fighting Liberal
  • The Montana Capitol Blog
  • The Montana Misanthrope
  • Thoughts From the Middle of Nowhere
  • Treasure State Judaism
  • Writing and the West
  • Wrong Dog's Life Chest
  • Wulfgar!

  • Powered by: SoapBlox